![\"Anna](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FAnna_Kournikova_of_Russia_74169e383a.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Anna Kournikova of Russia//Getty
For those of you who do not follow tennis keenly, and are interested in learning the nuances of the sport, one of the key rules you’ll need to know about is the double fault. A critical aspect of tennis, a double fault may seem like a minor mistake, but it has the potential to change the course of a game. Know everything about the double fault in this article.
Before getting into the details of a double fault, it is important to know what a fault in tennis is. A fault is when after the serve, the ball doesn't land in the correct service box or does not clear the net. Now coming to double faults.
A double fault in tennis happens when a player is not able to execute both of their allowed serves. In each point, a player is given two chances to serve - if the first serve is a fault, they have a second chance to make amends for it. However, if the second serve also fails, it results in a double fault, and the opponent is awarded the point. So, in simple words, if a player misses their first serve, they are allowed one more chance.
Technical flaws, in tandem with mounting pressure in high-stakes moments, can cause double faults. These faults are common in tennis, and we have seen even the greatest of the game fail to get it right both times. In the men’s game, a typical match might see a player commit between three to six double faults, while in the women’s game, the number might be slightly higher due to the different serving techniques and physical dynamics.
There are two primary ways a player can fault on their serve - service fault and foot fault.
Most of the faults you see a player commit in a match are service faults. These faults happen when the ball either hits the net or lands outside the designated service box. If a player makes two faults in a row during their serve, it's called a double fault.
Another way a fault can occur is by foot faulting, but this is very rare. Until the player serves the ball, both feet should be behind the baseline and in contact with the ground for the serve to be legal. If not, line judges can call it a foot fault. This is usually due to improper positioning or balance issues.
While foot faults are less common than service faults, they can still contribute to a double fault. For instance, if a player commits a foot fault on their first serve and then makes a service fault on their second serve, it still counts as a double fault.
Lack of accuracy in aiming the serve can also lead to faults, especially when trying to place the ball in a specific area of the service box. High-pressure situations can make these issues worse, as players may become anxious, leading to flawed serves. Additionally, conditions like wind can affect the serve's trajectory and increase the chances of faults.
A tennis ball can travel at really fast speeds, sometimes reaching up to 220 kmph. At such high speeds, it can be extremely challenging for line judges to accurately determine whether the ball lands inside the service box or not. The sheer speed of the ball can make it nearly impossible for the human eye to catch every detail.
To ensure fairness in these situations, modern tennis matches often rely on advanced technology like hawk-eye. Hawk-eye is a computerized system that uses multiple high-speed cameras to track the trajectory of the ball. We often see hawk-eye technology used in cricket as well.
When there's a dispute about whether a serve or shot landed in or out of bounds, players can use the hawk-eye to review the decision.
Each player is allowed three unsuccessful challenges per set. An unsuccessful challenge occurs when the review shows that the original call was correct. If a player uses all three challenges in a set and they are all unsuccessful, the player cannot challenge any more calls in that set.
But if a player's challenge is successful (i.e. when the call is overturned), it does not count against their three challenges. Players can continue to challenge as long as they are correct, with the limit only applying to challenges that are unsuccessful.
Anna Kournikova holds the unwanted record for the most double faults in a single match with 31 during the 1999 Australian Open. Despite this, she won the match.
Anna Kournikova of Russia//Getty
Marc Rosset, a former Swiss player, holds the record for the most double faults in a men’s singles match, with 30 during a 2001 Davis Cup match against Arnaud Clement, which he lost.
Alexander Bublik registered 26 double faults in the 2019 US Open but managed to win his match against Thomas Fabbiano.
Anna Kournikova of Russia//Getty
Anna Kournikova of Russia//Getty
A double fault in tennis happens when a player fails both of their serve attempts, and the opponent wins the point.
The two main causes are a service fault, where the ball doesn’t land in the correct area, and a foot fault, where the player steps on or over the baseline before serving.
A double fault in tennis happens when a player fails both of their serve attempts, and the opponent wins the point.
A double fault in tennis happens when a player fails both of their serve attempts, and the opponent wins the point.
A double fault in tennis happens when a player fails both of their serve attempts, and the opponent wins the point.
What are the two main causes of a double fault in tennis?The two main causes are a service fault, where the ball doesn’t land in the correct area, and a foot fault, where the player steps on or over the baseline before serving.
The two main causes are a service fault, where the ball doesn’t land in the correct area, and a foot fault, where the player steps on or over the baseline before serving.
The two main causes are a service fault, where the ball doesn’t land in the correct area, and a foot fault, where the player steps on or over the baseline before serving.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:06:38.996Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769998335_what-is-a-double-fault-in-tennis-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1049,"title":"What is a walkover in tennis?","slug":"what-is-a-walkover-in-tennis-","excerpt":"In general, a walkover means a situation where one participant or team wins because the other does not show up or is unable to compete. The term walko","content_html":"In general, a walkover means a situation where one participant or team wins because the other does not show up or is unable to compete.
The term walkover originally came from horse racing in the 19th century. When only one horse was entered in a race, there was no competition. To officially win, the lone horse just had to walk across the finish line, hence the term walkover. Over time, this word began to be used in other sports and contexts to describe any situation where one side wins because the other doesn't show up or can't compete.
In tennis, a walkover occurs when a player wins a match because their opponent withdraws or is unable to play, often due to injury or other reasons. The player has to inform the tournament referee prior to the start of the match if he cannot participate due to any reason. The result of a walkover is not officially recorded as a win or loss for either player in their official statistics or rankings.
At Wimbledon 2024, Novak Djokovic advanced to the semi-finals by virtue of a walkover. He moved forward without having to play his scheduled quarter-final match because Alex De Minaur withdrew due to a hip injury.
![\"Novak](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FNovak_Djokovic_SRB_with_his_violin_celebration_d2062d984f.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Novak Djokovic (SRB) with his violin celebration//Getty
Additionally, there was another walkover in the 2024 tournament. Lucas Pouille pulled out of his third-round match against De Minaur because of an injury, allowing De Minaur to advance automatically to the next round.
Novak Djokovic (SRB) with his violin celebration//Getty
Novak Djokovic (SRB) with his violin celebration//Getty
In tennis, both a walkover and a retirement refer to distinct scenarios where a match does not conclude as initially scheduled. But both scenarios are different.
Walkover: This situation arises when a player fails to appear for a scheduled match due to reasons such as injury, illness, or personal issues. Consequently, their opponent is awarded the victory without any play taking place. Walkovers are announced before the match starts.
Retirement: This occurs when a player begins a match but is forced to withdraw mid-match due to injury, illness, or other issues. The player who retires is unable to continue, leading to their opponent being declared the winner. Retirements happen during the match, often after some play has occurred.
At Wimbledon this year, there were just two walkovers, but the tournament saw several mid-match retirements. For instance, Madison Keys was close to winning her fourth-round match against Jasmine Paolini but had to retire at 5-5 in the third set. Similarly, Grigor Dimitrov was unable to finish the first set of his fourth-round encounter with Daniil Medvedev, retiring at 5-3.
![\"Madison](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FMadison_Keys_USA_in_tears_after_retiring_injured_dac490124b.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Madison Keys //Getty
Apart from walkover, and retirement, there is also the default in tennis. A default is when a player is disqualified from a match. This can happen if a player breaks the rules, such as through unsportsmanlike behaviour or repeatedly receiving penalties. When a player is defaulted, their opponent automatically wins the match.
In 2020, Djokovic became the first world No. 1 player to be disqualified from a Grand Slam singles tournament when he accidentally hit a line judge with a ball in frustration at the U.S. Open.
Then there is also the term withdrawal in tennis, which is very similar to walkover in meaning, but slightly different. A walkover happens after a tournament has started, while a withdrawal occurs when a tennis player decides not to participate before their first match.
Madison Keys //Getty
Madison Keys //Getty
Have a look at some of the most famous walkovers in tennis history.
The 2014 ATP Finals was set to feature a thrilling showdown between Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic. However, the highly anticipated final never took place. Federer, who had been dealing with back issues, managed to secure a win over his compatriot Stan Wawrinka in the semi-finals. Unfortunately, this effort aggravated his injury, leading to his withdrawal from the final.
Just an hour before the start of the final, Federer announced in a Facebook post that he would not be participating in the final due to an injury. The walkover handed Djokovic the title. Djokovic, in a show of sportsmanship, played an exhibition match against Andy Murray to compensate for the lost final.
The French Open is Nadal’s domain, where he has established an unparalleled legacy. However, in 2016, this dominance was interrupted when Nadal, after comfortably advancing to the third round, withdrew due to a wrist injury. His exit opened the door for Djokovic, who went on to win his first French Open title.
![\"Champion](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FChampion_Novak_Djokovic_of_Serbia_celebrates_56c7ff5177.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Champion Novak Djokovic celebrating//Getty
Champion Novak Djokovic celebrating//Getty
Champion Novak Djokovic celebrating//Getty
Federer’s decision to withdraw from the 2021 French Open after reaching the fourth round was as much about strategy as it was about health. Returning from knee surgeries, Federer chose to prioritize his recovery and the upcoming grass-court season over continuing in the physically demanding French Open. His walkover allowed Matteo Berrettini to advance without a fight, but it was Djokovic who ultimately stole the spotlight by claiming the title.
A walkover in tennis occurs when a player wins a match without actually playing because their opponent fails to show up or is unable to compete due to reasons like injury or illness. It means that the player who is absent effectively forfeits the match, and the present player is declared the winner automatically.
A walkover happens before a match starts when a player withdraws for reasons such as injury or personal issues, resulting in their opponent winning by default. A retirement, on the other hand, occurs when a player starts the match but is forced to withdraw mid-match due to injury or illness, leading to their opponent winning the match.
A walkover in tennis occurs when a player wins a match without actually playing because their opponent fails to show up or is unable to compete due to reasons like injury or illness. It means that the player who is absent effectively forfeits the match, and the present player is declared the winner automatically.
A walkover in tennis occurs when a player wins a match without actually playing because their opponent fails to show up or is unable to compete due to reasons like injury or illness. It means that the player who is absent effectively forfeits the match, and the present player is declared the winner automatically.
A walkover in tennis occurs when a player wins a match without actually playing because their opponent fails to show up or is unable to compete due to reasons like injury or illness. It means that the player who is absent effectively forfeits the match, and the present player is declared the winner automatically.
How does a walkover differ from a retirement in tennis?A walkover happens before a match starts when a player withdraws for reasons such as injury or personal issues, resulting in their opponent winning by default. A retirement, on the other hand, occurs when a player starts the match but is forced to withdraw mid-match due to injury or illness, leading to their opponent winning the match.
A walkover happens before a match starts when a player withdraws for reasons such as injury or personal issues, resulting in their opponent winning by default. A retirement, on the other hand, occurs when a player starts the match but is forced to withdraw mid-match due to injury or illness, leading to their opponent winning the match.
A walkover happens before a match starts when a player withdraws for reasons such as injury or personal issues, resulting in their opponent winning by default. A retirement, on the other hand, occurs when a player starts the match but is forced to withdraw mid-match due to injury or illness, leading to their opponent winning the match.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:06:29.516Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769988969_what-is-a-walkover-in-tennis-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1048,"title":"Best Tennis Player of All Time: Ranked!","slug":"best-tennis-player-of-all-time-ranked-","excerpt":"To rank the best tennis players of all time, we assigned scores based on a weighted evaluation of their key career milestones. Weightage Criteria : To","content_html":"To rank the best tennis players of all time, we assigned scores based on a weighted evaluation of their key career milestones.
Weightage Criteria:
To rank the best tennis players of all time, we assigned scores based on a weighted evaluation of their key career milestones.
Weightage Criteria:
To rank the best tennis players of all time, we assigned scores based on a weighted evaluation of their key career milestones.
Weightage Criteria:
Total Grand Slams (50%): Indicates success in the biggest tournaments.
Total Grand Slams (50%): Indicates success in the biggest tournaments.
Career Wins (20%): Reflects overall dominance and consistency.
Career Wins (20%): Reflects overall dominance and consistency.
CGS (30%): Measures the completion of Career Grand Slam achievements.
CGS (30%): Measures the completion of Career Grand Slam achievements.
| Player | Grand Slams | Career Wins | CGS | Score |
| Novak Djokovic | 24 | 377 | 3 | 1.00 |
| Rafael Nadal | 22 | 314 | 2 | 0.82 |
| Roger Federer | 20 | 369 | 1 | 0.71 |
| Roy Emerson | 12 | 210 | 2 | 0.56 |
| Rod Laver | 11 | 141 | 2 | 0.50 |
| Pete Sampras | 14 | 203 | 0 | 0.40 |
| Andre Agassi | 8 | 224 | 1 | 0.39 |
| Björn Borg | 11 | 141 | 0 | 0.30 |
| Jimmy Connors | 8 | 233 | 0 | 0.29 |
| Bill Tilden | 10 | 114 | 0 | 0.27 |
![\"Sportsboom](\"/_next/image?url=%2Fimages%2Fsportsboom-white-logo.png&w=1920&q=75\"){kind=logo}
| Player | Grand Slams | Career Wins | CGS | Score |
| Novak Djokovic | 24 | 377 | 3 | 1.00 |
| Rafael Nadal | 22 | 314 | 2 | 0.82 |
| Roger Federer | 20 | 369 | 1 | 0.71 |
| Roy Emerson | 12 | 210 | 2 | 0.56 |
| Rod Laver | 11 | 141 | 2 | 0.50 |
| Pete Sampras | 14 | 203 | 0 | 0.40 |
| Andre Agassi | 8 | 224 | 1 | 0.39 |
| Björn Borg | 11 | 141 | 0 | 0.30 |
| Jimmy Connors | 8 | 233 | 0 | 0.29 |
| Bill Tilden | 10 | 114 | 0 | 0.27 |
| Player | Grand Slams | Career Wins | CGS | Score |
| Novak Djokovic | 24 | 377 | 3 | 1.00 |
| Rafael Nadal | 22 | 314 | 2 | 0.82 |
| Roger Federer | 20 | 369 | 1 | 0.71 |
| Roy Emerson | 12 | 210 | 2 | 0.56 |
| Rod Laver | 11 | 141 | 2 | 0.50 |
| Pete Sampras | 14 | 203 | 0 | 0.40 |
| Andre Agassi | 8 | 224 | 1 | 0.39 |
| Björn Borg | 11 | 141 | 0 | 0.30 |
| Jimmy Connors | 8 | 233 | 0 | 0.29 |
| Bill Tilden | 10 | 114 | 0 | 0.27 |
There are several opinions one could have over who the greatest men’s tennis player of all-time is. We have sought to divide them based on an objective methodology rather than mere subjectivity.
There are several opinions one could have over who the greatest men’s tennis player of all-time is. We have sought to divide them based on an objective methodology rather than mere subjectivity.
There are several opinions one could have over who the greatest men’s tennis player of all-time is. We have sought to divide them based on an objective methodology rather than mere subjectivity.
Bill Tilden comes in 10th place with 10 grand slams and 114 career wins. Tilden played before the pro era but was the number one amateur player in the world from 1920 to 1925 – an astonishing six consecutive years.
Widely loved by supporters during his 24-year career from 1972-1996, Connors comes in at ninth place.
He amassed eight grand slam titles and 233 career wins.
The name which was first synonymous with Wimbledon, Borg was the first to win the title five consecutive times between 1976 and 1980. The Swede Killer crushed opponents with his ground game and absolute composure.
Retiring at the tender age of just 26, Bjorn Borg still managed to lift 11 Grand Slam titles. There is no doubt that he solidified his place in history.
This is a player who needs no introduction, and no top ten list is complete without his name on it. Agassi arrived on the tennis scene in the 80s, complete with a rock ‘n roll look and feel. He is another who divided opinion, but his talent could never be questioned.
His game was near complete, but it was his ability to return serve that was truly his point of difference and what kept him in some of histories fiercest battles.
Slightly above rival Agassi as the king of the 1990s and early 2000s before the rise of Roger Federer, Sampras is a household name. He was dominant presence in the open era, however some might point to the fact that he never earned a spot in a French Open – let alone make a final.
Nevertheless, holding first place for six consecutive years and winning 14 Grand Slam titles speak for themselves. His 14 titles were a record before the ‘big three’ of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic came.
Laver was already 30 years old when professionals were allowed to play in major tournaments. Now, when you consider that he lifted 74 tour titles in his illustrious career, he truly was a player to remember.
He may not be as celebrated in popular culture as fellow Australian Laver, but the stats say Roy Emerson has earned his spot on this list.
With 12 grand slams and 210 career wins, Emerson was statistically the greatest player in the pre-open era of tennis.
The 20-time Grand Slam Champion absolutely obliterated all that came before him in the 2000’s, his most notable feat is arguably the five consecutive Wimbledon titles – but if you ask him we’re sure he will say something different.
His calm demeanour – at least in the later stages of his career – his competitive spirit whilst ensuring his sportsmanship is never undermined and his likeability is what endears him to adoring fans around the world.
In the world of sport, it's hard to imagine we'll ever see anyone be as good at anything as Nadal was at playing tennis on the clay! He holds 14 titles at the French Open, but more so it is the record of 112 wins and just three losses! It’s just simply ridiculous.
Nadal’s consistency away from the red stuff is also worth noting though. He has won each slam at least twice, boasts 22 Grand slams and is rightly positioned in this number two spot.
Novak Djokovic has a game entrenched in precision and breathtaking speed. His ability to draw opponents into an encounter, before powerfully taking the point beyond them, illustrates for us that he is the closest thing to the perfect player. When you realise that he is the only player to beat the King of Clay – Rafa Nadal – at the French Open and also hold all four slams at the same time (matching the great Rod Laver), whether you love him or hate him, you have to admit that he truly is the greatest of all time.
There may be those who disagree, but the stats certainly point in Djokovic’s favour and those cannot be argued with.
Djokovic leads the way as the greatest male tennis player of all time with 24 grand slam titles and 377 career wins.
He is followed by two fellow greats of his generation, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. Roy Emerson and Rod Laver, two greats from the 1960s, are next.
Thereafter, 1990s and early 2000s stars Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi follow. Björn Borg, Jimmy Connors and Bill Tilden round up our top 10.
Bill Tilden comes in 10th place with 10 grand slams and 114 career wins. Tilden played before the pro era but was the number one amateur player in the world from 1920 to 1925 – an astonishing six consecutive years.
Bill Tilden comes in 10th place with 10 grand slams and 114 career wins. Tilden played before the pro era but was the number one amateur player in the world from 1920 to 1925 – an astonishing six consecutive years.
Bill Tilden comes in 10th place with 10 grand slams and 114 career wins. Tilden played before the pro era but was the number one amateur player in the world from 1920 to 1925 – an astonishing six consecutive years.
Bill Tilden comes in 10th place with 10 grand slams and 114 career wins. Tilden played before the pro era but was the number one amateur player in the world from 1920 to 1925 – an astonishing six consecutive years.
Bill Tilden comes in 10th place with 10 grand slams and 114 career wins. Tilden played before the pro era but was the number one amateur player in the world from 1920 to 1925 – an astonishing six consecutive years.
Widely loved by supporters during his 24-year career from 1972-1996, Connors comes in at ninth place.
He amassed eight grand slam titles and 233 career wins.
Widely loved by supporters during his 24-year career from 1972-1996, Connors comes in at ninth place.
He amassed eight grand slam titles and 233 career wins.
Widely loved by supporters during his 24-year career from 1972-1996, Connors comes in at ninth place.
He amassed eight grand slam titles and 233 career wins.
Widely loved by supporters during his 24-year career from 1972-1996, Connors comes in at ninth place.
He amassed eight grand slam titles and 233 career wins.
Widely loved by supporters during his 24-year career from 1972-1996, Connors comes in at ninth place.
He amassed eight grand slam titles and 233 career wins.
The name which was first synonymous with Wimbledon, Borg was the first to win the title five consecutive times between 1976 and 1980. The Swede Killer crushed opponents with his ground game and absolute composure.
Retiring at the tender age of just 26, Bjorn Borg still managed to lift 11 Grand Slam titles. There is no doubt that he solidified his place in history.
The name which was first synonymous with Wimbledon, Borg was the first to win the title five consecutive times between 1976 and 1980. The Swede Killer crushed opponents with his ground game and absolute composure.
Retiring at the tender age of just 26, Bjorn Borg still managed to lift 11 Grand Slam titles. There is no doubt that he solidified his place in history.
The name which was first synonymous with Wimbledon, Borg was the first to win the title five consecutive times between 1976 and 1980. The Swede Killer crushed opponents with his ground game and absolute composure.
Retiring at the tender age of just 26, Bjorn Borg still managed to lift 11 Grand Slam titles. There is no doubt that he solidified his place in history.
The name which was first synonymous with Wimbledon, Borg was the first to win the title five consecutive times between 1976 and 1980. The Swede Killer crushed opponents with his ground game and absolute composure.
Retiring at the tender age of just 26, Bjorn Borg still managed to lift 11 Grand Slam titles. There is no doubt that he solidified his place in history.
The name which was first synonymous with Wimbledon, Borg was the first to win the title five consecutive times between 1976 and 1980. The Swede Killer crushed opponents with his ground game and absolute composure.
Retiring at the tender age of just 26, Bjorn Borg still managed to lift 11 Grand Slam titles. There is no doubt that he solidified his place in history.
This is a player who needs no introduction, and no top ten list is complete without his name on it. Agassi arrived on the tennis scene in the 80s, complete with a rock ‘n roll look and feel. He is another who divided opinion, but his talent could never be questioned.
His game was near complete, but it was his ability to return serve that was truly his point of difference and what kept him in some of histories fiercest battles.
This is a player who needs no introduction, and no top ten list is complete without his name on it. Agassi arrived on the tennis scene in the 80s, complete with a rock ‘n roll look and feel. He is another who divided opinion, but his talent could never be questioned.
His game was near complete, but it was his ability to return serve that was truly his point of difference and what kept him in some of histories fiercest battles.
This is a player who needs no introduction, and no top ten list is complete without his name on it. Agassi arrived on the tennis scene in the 80s, complete with a rock ‘n roll look and feel. He is another who divided opinion, but his talent could never be questioned.
His game was near complete, but it was his ability to return serve that was truly his point of difference and what kept him in some of histories fiercest battles.
This is a player who needs no introduction, and no top ten list is complete without his name on it. Agassi arrived on the tennis scene in the 80s, complete with a rock ‘n roll look and feel. He is another who divided opinion, but his talent could never be questioned.
His game was near complete, but it was his ability to return serve that was truly his point of difference and what kept him in some of histories fiercest battles.
This is a player who needs no introduction, and no top ten list is complete without his name on it. Agassi arrived on the tennis scene in the 80s, complete with a rock ‘n roll look and feel. He is another who divided opinion, but his talent could never be questioned.
His game was near complete, but it was his ability to return serve that was truly his point of difference and what kept him in some of histories fiercest battles.
Slightly above rival Agassi as the king of the 1990s and early 2000s before the rise of Roger Federer, Sampras is a household name. He was dominant presence in the open era, however some might point to the fact that he never earned a spot in a French Open – let alone make a final.
Nevertheless, holding first place for six consecutive years and winning 14 Grand Slam titles speak for themselves. His 14 titles were a record before the ‘big three’ of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic came.
Slightly above rival Agassi as the king of the 1990s and early 2000s before the rise of Roger Federer, Sampras is a household name. He was dominant presence in the open era, however some might point to the fact that he never earned a spot in a French Open – let alone make a final.
Nevertheless, holding first place for six consecutive years and winning 14 Grand Slam titles speak for themselves. His 14 titles were a record before the ‘big three’ of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic came.
Slightly above rival Agassi as the king of the 1990s and early 2000s before the rise of Roger Federer, Sampras is a household name. He was dominant presence in the open era, however some might point to the fact that he never earned a spot in a French Open – let alone make a final.
Nevertheless, holding first place for six consecutive years and winning 14 Grand Slam titles speak for themselves. His 14 titles were a record before the ‘big three’ of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic came.
Slightly above rival Agassi as the king of the 1990s and early 2000s before the rise of Roger Federer, Sampras is a household name. He was dominant presence in the open era, however some might point to the fact that he never earned a spot in a French Open – let alone make a final.
Nevertheless, holding first place for six consecutive years and winning 14 Grand Slam titles speak for themselves. His 14 titles were a record before the ‘big three’ of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic came.
Slightly above rival Agassi as the king of the 1990s and early 2000s before the rise of Roger Federer, Sampras is a household name. He was dominant presence in the open era, however some might point to the fact that he never earned a spot in a French Open – let alone make a final.
Nevertheless, holding first place for six consecutive years and winning 14 Grand Slam titles speak for themselves. His 14 titles were a record before the ‘big three’ of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic came.
Laver was already 30 years old when professionals were allowed to play in major tournaments. Now, when you consider that he lifted 74 tour titles in his illustrious career, he truly was a player to remember.
Laver was already 30 years old when professionals were allowed to play in major tournaments. Now, when you consider that he lifted 74 tour titles in his illustrious career, he truly was a player to remember.
Laver was already 30 years old when professionals were allowed to play in major tournaments. Now, when you consider that he lifted 74 tour titles in his illustrious career, he truly was a player to remember.
Laver was already 30 years old when professionals were allowed to play in major tournaments. Now, when you consider that he lifted 74 tour titles in his illustrious career, he truly was a player to remember.
Laver was already 30 years old when professionals were allowed to play in major tournaments. Now, when you consider that he lifted 74 tour titles in his illustrious career, he truly was a player to remember.
He may not be as celebrated in popular culture as fellow Australian Laver, but the stats say Roy Emerson has earned his spot on this list.
With 12 grand slams and 210 career wins, Emerson was statistically the greatest player in the pre-open era of tennis.
He may not be as celebrated in popular culture as fellow Australian Laver, but the stats say Roy Emerson has earned his spot on this list.
With 12 grand slams and 210 career wins, Emerson was statistically the greatest player in the pre-open era of tennis.
He may not be as celebrated in popular culture as fellow Australian Laver, but the stats say Roy Emerson has earned his spot on this list.
With 12 grand slams and 210 career wins, Emerson was statistically the greatest player in the pre-open era of tennis.
He may not be as celebrated in popular culture as fellow Australian Laver, but the stats say Roy Emerson has earned his spot on this list.
With 12 grand slams and 210 career wins, Emerson was statistically the greatest player in the pre-open era of tennis.
He may not be as celebrated in popular culture as fellow Australian Laver, but the stats say Roy Emerson has earned his spot on this list.
With 12 grand slams and 210 career wins, Emerson was statistically the greatest player in the pre-open era of tennis.
The 20-time Grand Slam Champion absolutely obliterated all that came before him in the 2000’s, his most notable feat is arguably the five consecutive Wimbledon titles – but if you ask him we’re sure he will say something different.
His calm demeanour – at least in the later stages of his career – his competitive spirit whilst ensuring his sportsmanship is never undermined and his likeability is what endears him to adoring fans around the world.
The 20-time Grand Slam Champion absolutely obliterated all that came before him in the 2000’s, his most notable feat is arguably the five consecutive Wimbledon titles – but if you ask him we’re sure he will say something different.
His calm demeanour – at least in the later stages of his career – his competitive spirit whilst ensuring his sportsmanship is never undermined and his likeability is what endears him to adoring fans around the world.
The 20-time Grand Slam Champion absolutely obliterated all that came before him in the 2000’s, his most notable feat is arguably the five consecutive Wimbledon titles – but if you ask him we’re sure he will say something different.
His calm demeanour – at least in the later stages of his career – his competitive spirit whilst ensuring his sportsmanship is never undermined and his likeability is what endears him to adoring fans around the world.
The 20-time Grand Slam Champion absolutely obliterated all that came before him in the 2000’s, his most notable feat is arguably the five consecutive Wimbledon titles – but if you ask him we’re sure he will say something different.
His calm demeanour – at least in the later stages of his career – his competitive spirit whilst ensuring his sportsmanship is never undermined and his likeability is what endears him to adoring fans around the world.
The 20-time Grand Slam Champion absolutely obliterated all that came before him in the 2000’s, his most notable feat is arguably the five consecutive Wimbledon titles – but if you ask him we’re sure he will say something different.
His calm demeanour – at least in the later stages of his career – his competitive spirit whilst ensuring his sportsmanship is never undermined and his likeability is what endears him to adoring fans around the world.
In the world of sport, it's hard to imagine we'll ever see anyone be as good at anything as Nadal was at playing tennis on the clay! He holds 14 titles at the French Open, but more so it is the record of 112 wins and just three losses! It’s just simply ridiculous.
Nadal’s consistency away from the red stuff is also worth noting though. He has won each slam at least twice, boasts 22 Grand slams and is rightly positioned in this number two spot.
In the world of sport, it's hard to imagine we'll ever see anyone be as good at anything as Nadal was at playing tennis on the clay! He holds 14 titles at the French Open, but more so it is the record of 112 wins and just three losses! It’s just simply ridiculous.
Nadal’s consistency away from the red stuff is also worth noting though. He has won each slam at least twice, boasts 22 Grand slams and is rightly positioned in this number two spot.
In the world of sport, it's hard to imagine we'll ever see anyone be as good at anything as Nadal was at playing tennis on the clay! He holds 14 titles at the French Open, but more so it is the record of 112 wins and just three losses! It’s just simply ridiculous.
Nadal’s consistency away from the red stuff is also worth noting though. He has won each slam at least twice, boasts 22 Grand slams and is rightly positioned in this number two spot.
In the world of sport, it's hard to imagine we'll ever see anyone be as good at anything as Nadal was at playing tennis on the clay! He holds 14 titles at the French Open, but more so it is the record of 112 wins and just three losses! It’s just simply ridiculous.
Nadal’s consistency away from the red stuff is also worth noting though. He has won each slam at least twice, boasts 22 Grand slams and is rightly positioned in this number two spot.
In the world of sport, it's hard to imagine we'll ever see anyone be as good at anything as Nadal was at playing tennis on the clay! He holds 14 titles at the French Open, but more so it is the record of 112 wins and just three losses! It’s just simply ridiculous.
Nadal’s consistency away from the red stuff is also worth noting though. He has won each slam at least twice, boasts 22 Grand slams and is rightly positioned in this number two spot.
Novak Djokovic has a game entrenched in precision and breathtaking speed. His ability to draw opponents into an encounter, before powerfully taking the point beyond them, illustrates for us that he is the closest thing to the perfect player. When you realise that he is the only player to beat the King of Clay – Rafa Nadal – at the French Open and also hold all four slams at the same time (matching the great Rod Laver), whether you love him or hate him, you have to admit that he truly is the greatest of all time.
There may be those who disagree, but the stats certainly point in Djokovic’s favour and those cannot be argued with.
Djokovic leads the way as the greatest male tennis player of all time with 24 grand slam titles and 377 career wins.
He is followed by two fellow greats of his generation, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. Roy Emerson and Rod Laver, two greats from the 1960s, are next.
Thereafter, 1990s and early 2000s stars Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi follow. Björn Borg, Jimmy Connors and Bill Tilden round up our top 10.
Novak Djokovic has a game entrenched in precision and breathtaking speed. His ability to draw opponents into an encounter, before powerfully taking the point beyond them, illustrates for us that he is the closest thing to the perfect player. When you realise that he is the only player to beat the King of Clay – Rafa Nadal – at the French Open and also hold all four slams at the same time (matching the great Rod Laver), whether you love him or hate him, you have to admit that he truly is the greatest of all time.
There may be those who disagree, but the stats certainly point in Djokovic’s favour and those cannot be argued with.
Djokovic leads the way as the greatest male tennis player of all time with 24 grand slam titles and 377 career wins.
He is followed by two fellow greats of his generation, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. Roy Emerson and Rod Laver, two greats from the 1960s, are next.
Thereafter, 1990s and early 2000s stars Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi follow. Björn Borg, Jimmy Connors and Bill Tilden round up our top 10.
Novak Djokovic has a game entrenched in precision and breathtaking speed. His ability to draw opponents into an encounter, before powerfully taking the point beyond them, illustrates for us that he is the closest thing to the perfect player. When you realise that he is the only player to beat the King of Clay – Rafa Nadal – at the French Open and also hold all four slams at the same time (matching the great Rod Laver), whether you love him or hate him, you have to admit that he truly is the greatest of all time.
There may be those who disagree, but the stats certainly point in Djokovic’s favour and those cannot be argued with.
Djokovic leads the way as the greatest male tennis player of all time with 24 grand slam titles and 377 career wins.
He is followed by two fellow greats of his generation, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. Roy Emerson and Rod Laver, two greats from the 1960s, are next.
Thereafter, 1990s and early 2000s stars Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi follow. Björn Borg, Jimmy Connors and Bill Tilden round up our top 10.
Novak Djokovic has a game entrenched in precision and breathtaking speed. His ability to draw opponents into an encounter, before powerfully taking the point beyond them, illustrates for us that he is the closest thing to the perfect player. When you realise that he is the only player to beat the King of Clay – Rafa Nadal – at the French Open and also hold all four slams at the same time (matching the great Rod Laver), whether you love him or hate him, you have to admit that he truly is the greatest of all time.
There may be those who disagree, but the stats certainly point in Djokovic’s favour and those cannot be argued with.
Djokovic leads the way as the greatest male tennis player of all time with 24 grand slam titles and 377 career wins.
He is followed by two fellow greats of his generation, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. Roy Emerson and Rod Laver, two greats from the 1960s, are next.
Thereafter, 1990s and early 2000s stars Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi follow. Björn Borg, Jimmy Connors and Bill Tilden round up our top 10.
Novak Djokovic has a game entrenched in precision and breathtaking speed. His ability to draw opponents into an encounter, before powerfully taking the point beyond them, illustrates for us that he is the closest thing to the perfect player. When you realise that he is the only player to beat the King of Clay – Rafa Nadal – at the French Open and also hold all four slams at the same time (matching the great Rod Laver), whether you love him or hate him, you have to admit that he truly is the greatest of all time.
There may be those who disagree, but the stats certainly point in Djokovic’s favour and those cannot be argued with.
Djokovic leads the way as the greatest male tennis player of all time with 24 grand slam titles and 377 career wins.
He is followed by two fellow greats of his generation, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer. Roy Emerson and Rod Laver, two greats from the 1960s, are next.
Thereafter, 1990s and early 2000s stars Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi follow. Björn Borg, Jimmy Connors and Bill Tilden round up our top 10.
Winning Grand Slams remains the highest benchmark for success in tennis. Novak Djokovic leads the all-time grand slam rankings, with Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer following. This sets them apart from previous generations of men’s greats as the best tennis players of all time.
Career Wins: Consistent victories across ATP and Grand Slam events indicate a player’s dominance. As a result, players who have consistently won tournaments throughout the course of their career were given advantageous rankings.
Career Wins: Consistent victories across ATP and Grand Slam events indicate a player’s dominance. As a result, players who have consistently won tournaments throughout the course of their career were given advantageous rankings.
Career Grand Slam (CGS): A career grand slam occurs when a player wins all four grand slam tournaments. Novak Djokovic has win all four at least three times – the only man in tennis history to achieve this feat.
Career Grand Slam (CGS): A career grand slam occurs when a player wins all four grand slam tournaments. Novak Djokovic has win all four at least three times – the only man in tennis history to achieve this feat.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:06:16.651Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769976269_best-tennis-player-of-all-time-ranked-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1047,"title":"Did Rafael Nadal Retire from Tennis? His Final Farewell","slug":"did-rafael-nadal-retire-from-tennis-his-final-farewell","excerpt":"Rafael Nadal announced his retirement from tennis on Thursday, 10 October. His time in the sport will be over after the Davis Cup final. That tourname","content_html":"Rafael Nadal announced his retirement from tennis on Thursday, 10 October. His time in the sport will be over after the Davis Cup final. That tournament’s final eight event will take place from 19-24 November.
Nadal previously remained coy on when, exactly, he would retire from tennis, although he admitted to knowing his powers are on the wane.
In an interview with El Hormiguero, Nadal had said that playing at Roland Garros one more time in 2025 was “an option”. Now, however, he has put paid to that potential plan.
Nadal had specifically requested that reporters stop repeatedly questioning him on when he will retire, as he wanted to keep his confidence high and enjoy the sport of tennis for as long as he could.
\"It's an option [to play again at Roland Garros], right now the goals are over and I'm giving myself time. I'm enjoying training and other things in life,\" Nadal said in an interview with El Hormiguero in September 2024.
\"I understand that I'm retiring. It's been a long time, I've had a lot of physical problems and the question is normal.
\"There comes a time when I can't live with [the idea of] retirement, because otherwise you don't finish trying. I've given myself some time to enjoy tennis after a year and a half off the court and that's what I'm doing, enjoying the day to day.
\"In the end, I'm giving myself time and making my decision when I'm clear about it. I try to do things as well as possible. I ask that they don't bring up my retirement in every press conference because otherwise I end up believing that I'm going to retire.\"
Nadal turned 38 years old on 3 June 2024, during Roland Garros – a tournament from which he had already been eliminated in the first round by Alexander Zverev.
As Nadal himself admitted, it is normal for a player in his late thirties to be thinking about retirement – or, at least, to be asked about it.
However, Nadal in particular has been plagued by injury issues throughout his career – making his tally of 22 grand slam titles even more impressive.
In 2003, Nadal had an elbow injury which forced him to postpone his French Open debut. The following year, he suffered a stress fracture.
He suffered a foot injury in late 2005 that carried over into early 2006, causing him to miss the Paris Masters, ATP Finals and Australian Open. The effects of this one may have followed him throughout his career.
At the 2007 Cincinnati Masters, he withdrew from a match against Juan Monaco with dizziness and forearm cramp.
He struggled with his knees in 2008 and 2009 and missed Wimbledon 2009 with tendonitis, rendering him unable to defend his title which he had won for the first time the previous year.
He also missed the chance to defend his 2008 Olympic gold medal at London 2012 with tendonitis and a patella tear kept him out of the US Open at the end of that year.
His nightmare 2012 continued and carried over to the next year. In December 2012, it was announced that Nadal would miss the 2013 Australian Open with a stomach virus.
Nadal’s injury troubles would continue thereafter. In 2014, he battled through a back injury in the Australian Open final – eventually succumbing to Stanislas Wawrinka in four sets.
He also suffered recurring problems with his wrist around this time.
An injury to his left foot kept him out of the 2021 US Open and after he won his 21st and 22nd major in 2022, his hip problems the following year appear to have allowed Novak Djoković to finally claim the undisputed title as the most successful men’s tennis player in grand slam history.
Nadal has said that the Davis Cup this year would be his final tournament, so judging by that, it is safe to assume he will not play at Roland Garros in 2025. He retires as the most successful player in the history of the French Open with 14 of his 22 triumphs in grand slam tournaments coming at Roland Garros.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:06:03.811Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769963179_did-rafael-nadal-retire-from-tennis-his-final-farewell_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1046,"title":"How Long Is a Tennis match?","slug":"how-long-is-a-tennis-match-","excerpt":"Best of five sets is used in men's Grand Slam tournaments and can last anywhere from 2.5 to 5 hours – occasionally even longer. The famous John Isner ","content_html":"Best of five sets is used in men's Grand Slam tournaments and can last anywhere from 2.5 to 5 hours – occasionally even longer.
The famous John Isner vs. Nicolas Mahut match at Wimbledon 2010, which lasted 11 hours and 5 minutes over three days, was a prime example.
Defensive players with long rallies can extend matches, while aggressive, quick-serve players may shorten them.
If sets are tied at 6-6, a tiebreaker is played, which can also affect match duration. At the time of the Isner v Mahut match, there was no tiebreaker for fifth set matches, so a player had to win at least six games while also winning the set by two games. This is how the match was able to drag on for so long, with the set ultimately going the way of Isner 70-68.
Factors like weather, court surface, and even player fitness can impact match length.
Men's singles matches are typically played as best-of-five sets at Grand Slam tournaments. This format allows for longer matches since a player must win three sets to secure victory. In most non-Grand Slam events, men's matches are played as best-of-three sets, as is also the case in women's matches.
Across all tournaments, including Grand Slams, women's singles matches are consistently played as best-of-three sets. Thus, a player needs to win two sets to win the match. This means that at grand slam tournaments, men’s matches can regularly go on for up to five hours, whereas a three-hour match is extremely long in women’s tennis. However, there are only four grand slam tournaments per year and in other tournaments, there is generally no difference in terms of format between men’s (ATP) and women’s (WTA) matches.
| Event type | Men’s matches | Women’s matches |
| Grand slam singles | Best of 5 sets | Best of 3 sets |
| Grand slam doubles | Best of 3 sets | Best of 3 sets |
| Regular tournament singles | Best of 3 sets | Best of 3 sets |
| Regular tournament doubles | Best of 3 sets | Best of 3 sets |
The longest tennis match ever played was a Men's singles first-round contest at Wimbledon 2010 featuring the victorious John Isner, the 23rd seed from the USA, against France’s Nicolas Mahut, who had advanced through the qualifying rounds.
The match commenced on Court 18 at 6:13 p.m. British Summer Time (17:13 UTC) on Tuesday, 22 June 2010. As daylight began to fade, play was halted at 9:07 p.m. before the fifth set could begin. The match resumed the following day, Wednesday, 23 June, at 2:05 p.m., and by 5:45 p.m., it had already become the longest tennis match ever. Play continued until the score reached 59-59 in the final set, forcing another suspension at 9:09 p.m. due to insufficient light.
When action resumed at 3:40 p.m. on Thursday, 24 June, Isner finally clinched the win at 4:47 p.m., with the fifth set lasting an incredible 8 hours and 11 minutes.
The overall match spanned 11 hours and 5 minutes of playing time spread across three days, with the final score reading 6–4, 3–6, 6–7(7–9), 7–6(7–3), 70–68 to Isner, totaling 183 games. It remains the longest match in tennis history both in terms of time played and total games. In fact, the fifth set alone surpassed the length of the previous record for the longest match.
During the contest, both players shattered multiple records at Wimbledon and in tennis history, including each serving over 100 aces.
Years after this record-breaking marathon of a match, Wimbledon introduced a rule change in 2019, mandating a tiebreak if the score in the fifth set (or third set in women's matches) reached 12-12. Another rule modification in 2022 introduced a 10-point tiebreak at 6-6 in the final set across all Grand Slam events, making it highly unlikely that another match will surpass the length of the Isner–Mahut clash.
The reason why the final set in the Isner Mahut clash took so long to complete was that in the absence of a tiebreaker, a player had to not only win at least six games in order to take the set, but also win two games more than their opponent. It took until Isner had won 70 games before he could extend his lead to two over Mahut. This would not have happened if there was a tiebreaker once the score in the fifth set had reached 6-6.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:05:53.589Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769952382_how-long-is-a-tennis-match-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1045,"title":"What is a Grand Slam in tennis?","slug":"what-is-a-grand-slam-in-tennis-","excerpt":"However, the term is also used as an alternative name to major tournaments. In other words; the Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon and US Open ca","content_html":"However, the term is also used as an alternative name to major tournaments. In other words; the Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon and US Open can either be referred to as major tournaments or grand slam tournaments.
If a player wins four grand slam tournaments consecutively, but not all within a calendar year, that is referred to as a non-calendar-year Grand Slam.
If a player wins all four grand slam tournaments in the course of their careers, that is referred to as a Career Grand Slam.
Don Budge (1938), Maureen Connolly (1953), Rod Laver (1962 & 1969), Margaret Court (1970) and Steffi Graf (1988) have completed a Grand Slam, each winning all four majors within a calendar year in the singles.
Steffi Graf also won the women’s singles gold medal at the 1988 Seoul Olympics in the year of her Grand Slam, so her achievement is referred to as a “Golden Slam”.
Don Budge (1938), Maureen Connolly Brinker (1953), Rod Laver (1962 & 1969), Margaret Smith Court (1970) and Steffi Graf (1988) have completed a Grand Slam within the singles game, which means that they won all four majors – the Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon and Roland Garros – within a calendar year.
In doubles tennis, the first Grand Slam was achieved by Australians Frank Sedgman and Ken McGregor in 1951. Martina Navratilova and Pam Shriver of the United States accomplished this feat in 1984. In mixed doubles, Australians Margaret Smith Court and Ken Fletcher secured a Grand Slam in 1963. Additionally, Maria Bueno (1960), Owen Davidson (1967), and Martina Hingis (1998) each completed a personal Slam in doubles, partnering with two different players.
| Player(s) | Year | Category |
| Don Budge | 1938 | Men’s singles |
| Frank Sedgman & Ken McGregor | 1951 | Men’s doubles |
| Maureen Connolly Brinker | 1953 | Women’s singles |
| Maria Bueno (with different partners) | 1960 | Women’s doubles |
| Rod Laver | 1962 | Men’s singles |
| Margaret Smith Court & Ken Fletcher | 1963 | Mixed doubles |
| Owen Davidson (with different partners) | 1967 | Mixed doubles |
| Rod Laver | 1969 | Men’s singles |
| Margaret Smith Court | 1970 | Women’s singles |
| Martina Navratilova & Pam Shriver | 1984 | Women’s doubles |
| Steffi Graf | 1988 | Women’s singles |
| Martina Hingis (with different partners) | 1998 | Women’s doubles |
| Player(s) | Year | Category |
| Don Budge | 1938 | Men’s singles |
| Frank Sedgman & Ken McGregor | 1951 | Men’s doubles |
| Maureen Connolly Brinker | 1953 | Women’s singles |
| Maria Bueno (with different partners) | 1960 | Women’s doubles |
| Rod Laver | 1962 | Men’s singles |
| Margaret Smith Court & Ken Fletcher | 1963 | Mixed doubles |
| Owen Davidson (with different partners) | 1967 | Mixed doubles |
| Rod Laver | 1969 | Men’s singles |
| Margaret Smith Court | 1970 | Women’s singles |
| Martina Navratilova & Pam Shriver | 1984 | Women’s doubles |
| Steffi Graf | 1988 | Women’s singles |
| Martina Hingis (with different partners) | 1998 | Women’s doubles |
| Player(s) | Year | Category |
| Don Budge | 1938 | Men’s singles |
| Frank Sedgman & Ken McGregor | 1951 | Men’s doubles |
| Maureen Connolly Brinker | 1953 | Women’s singles |
| Maria Bueno (with different partners) | 1960 | Women’s doubles |
| Rod Laver | 1962 | Men’s singles |
| Margaret Smith Court & Ken Fletcher | 1963 | Mixed doubles |
| Owen Davidson (with different partners) | 1967 | Mixed doubles |
| Rod Laver | 1969 | Men’s singles |
| Margaret Smith Court | 1970 | Women’s singles |
| Martina Navratilova & Pam Shriver | 1984 | Women’s doubles |
| Steffi Graf | 1988 | Women’s singles |
| Martina Hingis (with different partners) | 1998 | Women’s doubles |
In 1988, Steffi Graf not only completed a Grand Slam by winning all four major tournaments, but she also won the gold medal at the Seoul Olympics women’s singles tournament in the same year, hence why her achievement in that year is referred to as the “Golden Slam”.
A non-calendar-year Grand Slam entails a player winning all four major tournaments back-to-back, but not in the space of a calendar year.
For instance, Novak Djokovic won Wimbledon and the US Open in 2015 and then the Australian and French Opens in 2016, meaning he had won four Grand Slam tournaments in a row, but he did not complete a Grand Slam within a calendar year.
A Career Grand Slam entails a player winning all four grand slam tournaments over the course of their career – not necessarily consecutively.
![\"Rod](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FRod_Laver_Returning_the_Ball_33ff62f0ff.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Rod Laver Returning the Ball//Getty Images
In the men’s singles tennis, eight players have achieved a career Grand Slam. They are: Fred Perry (who completed his in 1935), Don Budge (1938), Rod Laver (1962), Roy Emerson (1964), Andre Agassi (1999), Roger Federer (2009), Rafael Nadal (2010), and Novak Djokovic (2016).
In the women’s singles, 10 players have achieved the feat – namely: Maureen Connolly Brinker (1953), Doris Hart (1954), Shirley Fry Irvin (1957), Margaret Smith Court (1963), Billie Jean King (1972), Chris Evert (1982), Martina Navratilova (1983), Steffi Graf (1988), Serena Williams (2003), and Maria Sharapova (2012).
Rod Laver Returning the Ball//Getty Images
Rod Laver Returning the Ball//Getty Images
Each year, there are four Grand Slam tournaments – also known as major tournaments: the Australian Open, the French Open (also known as Roland Garros), Wimbledon and the US Open.
These tournaments are characterised by higher prize money than other tennis tournaments – and in the men’s singles slams, the matches are best of five sets, as opposed to best of three as is the case for regular ATP tournaments. In women’s Grand Slam tournaments, however, the matches are still best of three sets as is the case in their regular ATP tournaments.
The most successful men’s singles tennis player in Grand Slam history is Novak Djokovic, who has won 24 major titles. This is level with the most successful women’s singles player, Margaret Court.
Margaret Court is the most successful player in the history of Grand Slam tournaments with 64 when her singles, women’s doubles and mixed doubles tallies are combined.
In the men’s game, that honour goes to Roy Emerson, who won 12 singles titles and 16 doubles titles.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:05:43.632Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769942802_what-is-a-grand-slam-in-tennis-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1044,"title":"Top 10 Male Tennis Players of All Time","slug":"top-10-male-tennis-players-of-all-time","excerpt":"For the better part of the last century, this has been an unending debate. From the open era, to the ‘big four’ and everything in between, many talent","content_html":"For the better part of the last century, this has been an unending debate. From the open era, to the ‘big four’ and everything in between, many talents have stepped forward to lay claim to the title ‘greatest’.
How does one even begin to decide who is the ‘greatest’? Do you position the open era against everything before? How much weight do Grand Slams have? This is our take on the top 10 male players to step onto a tennis court.
![\"Andy](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FAndy_Murray_of_Great_Britain_80962f7f7a.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Andy Murray of Great Britain//Getty Images
This is a pick which will likely split opinion…Andy is without a doubt the most influential player in British Tennis history, but does he belong in the top 10? We certainly believe so.
Andy Murray was part of the ‘big four’ which dominated for a little over a decade. He went hammer and tong at legends on the court, and slowly etched his own name in history. He was the first British man to win Wimbledon since 1936, the first to win Olympic titles back-to-back, and at the risk of being too biased, We think his career wasn’t really a true reflection of his ability.
He deserves this tenth spot.
Andy Murray of Great Britain//Getty Images
Andy Murray of Great Britain//Getty Images
![\"Andre](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FAndre_Agassi_f59b8a941e.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Andre Agassi//Getty Images
This is a player who needs no introduction, and no top ten list is complete without his name on it. Agassi arrived on the tennis scene in the 80s, complete with a rock ‘n roll look and feel. He is another who divided opinion, but his talent could never be questioned.
His game was near complete, but it was his ability to return serve that was truly his point of difference and what kept him in some of histories fiercest battles.
Andre Agassi//Getty Images
Andre Agassi//Getty Images
![\"John](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FGetty_Images_565080901_4f1da92865.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
John McEnroe//Getty Images
Has there been a better tennis player on hard courts and fast surfaces? The American is known for his creative shot-making, a fiery attitude and every now and again Tennis’ ‘Bad Boy’.
You either loved and adored him, or absolutely hated him. What cannot be denied though is that he was a competitive athlete, unapologetic about wanting to always win and whilst his emotions were likely his Achilles heel, he was a true tennis talent.
John McEnroe//Getty Images
John McEnroe//Getty Images
![\"Ivan](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FIvan_Lendl_e8c5ead6a3.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Ivan Lendl//Getty Images
The Czech with the big serve – Ivan was a dominant force in the 80s, and really reimagined what fitness and conditioning was for an athlete. Ivan Lendl held the top male spot in tennis for 270 weeks (a record at the time) and unlike many other players of that time, preferred to let his game do all of the talking.
Ivan was inducted into the Tennis Hall of Fame in 2001.
Ivan Lendl//Getty Images
Ivan Lendl//Getty Images
![\"PICTURE](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FGetty_Images_1579571_10183db3e0.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Bjorn Borg//Getty Images
The name which was first synonymous with Wimbledon, Borg was the first to win the title five consecutive times between 1976 and 1980. The Swede Killer crushed opponents with his ground game and absolute composure.
Retiring at the tender age of just 26, Bjorn Borg still managed to lift 11 Grand Slam titles and was the first to break the proverbial ‘gate’ to winning ten slams for an individual. There is no doubt that he solidified his place in history.
Bjorn Borg//Getty Images
Bjorn Borg//Getty Images
![\"Pete](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FGetty_Images_1447114904_fa1ebf8d55.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Pete Sampras//Getty Images
In our opinion, Sampras is worthy of holding this mid-table placing. He is a household name, and a dominant presence in the open era, however some might point to the fact that he never earned a spot in a French Open – let alone make a final.
Nevertheless, holding first place for six consecutive years and winning 14 Grand Slam titles speak for themselves.
Pete Sampras//Getty Images
Pete Sampras//Getty Images
![\"Australian](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FGetty_Images_1419235094_c89759c8d9.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Rod Laver//Getty Images
Yes, he is the only addition to the list from before the Open Era, but there is nobody more deserving. Laver was already 30 years old when professionals were allowed to play in major tournaments. Now, when you consider that he lifted 74 tour titles in his illustrious career, he truly is Australia’s crown jewel.
Rod Laver//Getty Images
Rod Laver//Getty Images
![\"Roger](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FGetty_Images_1199253351_45fcb2c9b8.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Roger Federer//Getty Images
We suspect this won’t go down well with everyone, but in the world of tennis where the very word tennis is interchangeable with Federer – we think he is a worthy number three. The 20-time Grand Slam Champion absolutely obliterated all that came before him in the 2000’s, his most notable feat is arguably the five consecutive Wimbledon titles – but if you ask him we’re sure he will say something different.
His calm demeanour – at least in the later stages of his career – his competitive spirit whilst ensuring his sportsmanship is never undermined and his likeability is what endears him to adoring fans around the world.
Roger Federer//Getty Images
Roger Federer//Getty Images
![\"Rafael](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FGetty_Images_2164088774_ca20a654e1.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Rafael Nadal//Getty Images
In the world of sport, it's hard to imagine we'll ever see anyone be as good at anything as Nadal was at playing tennis on the clay! He holds 14 titles at the French Open, but more so it is the record of 112 wins and just three losses! It’s just simply ridiculous.
Nadal’s consistency away from the red stuff is also worth noting though. He has won each slam at least twice, boasts 22 Grand slams and is rightly positioned in this number two spot.
Rafael Nadal//Getty Images
Rafael Nadal//Getty Images
![\"Novak](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FGetty_Images_1511560531_3f4d293921.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Novak Djokovic//Getty Images
You could argue that the top three could be presented in any order – and your argument would be valid! However, top spot here goes to the man who has spent more weeks at the summit of global tennis than anyone in history.
Novak has a game entrenched in precision and breathtaking speed. His ability to draw opponents into an encounter, before powerfully taking the point beyond them, illustrates for us that he is the closest thing to the perfect player. When you realise that he is the only player to beat the King of Clay – Rafa Nadal – at the French Open and also hold all four slams at the same time (matching the great Rod Laver), whether you love him or hate him, you have to admit that he truly is the greatest of all time.
Novak Djokovic//Getty Images
Novak Djokovic//Getty Images
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:05:30.122Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769929379_top-10-male-tennis-players-of-all-time_featured.png","image_url":null},{"id":1043,"title":"Top 10 Tallest Tennis Players in 2025","slug":"top-10-tallest-tennis-players-in-2025","excerpt":"In tennis, height is often always seen as an aspect which supports a player’s power, reach and service game. we outline the top ten tallest tennis pla","content_html":"In tennis, height is often always seen as an aspect which supports a player’s power, reach and service game. we outline the top ten tallest tennis players on the tour – as well as giving special mentions to the shortest!
![\"Jessica](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2Fessica_Bouzas_Maneiro_a1ea9e8e04.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro//Getty Images
Famously, Marketa Vondrousova became the first unseeded women in the Open Era to win Wimbledon! She beat Tunisia’s Ons Jabeur 6-4, 6-4 to be crowned champion. Despite struggling with injuries, she has managed to earn a career ranking of 6th!
Standing at 5’ 8’’, she creeps into our top ten list. Special mentions are; Aryna Sabalenka and Elena Rybakina (6’ 0’’), Jelena Ostapenko (5’ 10’’) and Coco Gauff (5’ 9’’).
Interestingly, the shortest female tennis player on the tour is Australia’s Lauren Davis, standing at just 5’ 2’’.
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro//Getty Images
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro//Getty Images
Taking the tennis world by storm in 2020, Swiatek won the French Open at Roland-Garros without dropping a single set! She also became the first Polish player (male or female) to win a Grand Slam singles title.
Most recently, Iga paid special tribute to Rafa Nadal (who announced his retirement from professional tennis) calling the Spaniard her absolute ‘inspiration’.
Kvitova was previously ranked 2nd in the world, and she is a two-time winner of the Wimbledon Championships. These two wins came in 2011 and 2014 respectively. More recently, Kvitova has won the German Open and the Miami Open in 2023.
However, it was in 2016 where she won a bronze medal at the Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. This would have no doubt been an immensely proud moment for not only herself, but for her country as well.
Often referred to as the ‘Brazilian Ace’, Haddad Maia has seen much of her success come in the doubles arena. She has earned a career high doubles ranking of 10th and bagged as many as six doubles titles.
Her most recent win, at the time of writing, was the WTA 500 singles title, where she came back from a 26-minute first set loss to beat Kasatkina for the WTA Elite Trophy Zhuhai.
Karolina is former number 1 WTA player, but she is arguably infamous for being the only player to ever be ranked number one in the world and yet never win a Grand Slam title! The Czech player does, however, boast a competitive serve and, albeit inconsistent, volley game.
The New Zealander is currently the tallest women’s player on the WTA Tour. She has a doubles ranking of 11th, and at the time of writing, she has won 20 doubles titles! Interestingly, her singles numbers are not nearly as impressive…
Ranked 675th, her career high is just 582nd.
The final male player on the list, Matteo reached a career high ranking of 6th in 2022. He has, however, somewhat fallen off since this accomplishment. Yes, injury has had a lot to do with this drop off, but you get the feeling that the Italian will soon rise to prominence again.
Special mentions do go to; Novak Djokovic, Jannik Sinner and Andrey Rublev (6’ 2’’), Carlos Alcaraz (6’ 1’’) and Alex De Minaur (6’ 0’’).
Although Matteo ranks as the shortest male player on this list, the shortest male tennis player on the tour is Diego Schwartzman from Argentina.
Daniil is always a player who seems to be there and there about. He has spent his entire career competing with the very best, and whilst many often forget him when compiling their ‘greatest of all time’ lists, Daniil is a multiple Grand Slam finalist and US Open winner.
He also claimed the top spot in men’s tennis during 2020!
Eubanks earned his breakthrough in 2023, but it was his quarterfinal run at Wimbledon which captured the hearts and imagination of the tennis world. The 27-year-old, who just constantly fights for every opportunity he gets in tennis, captured his maiden ATP title at the Mallorca Open.
The friendly American currently takes second spot for the tallest player on the tour.
![\"Reilly](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FReilly_Opelka_eb9b5f9f85.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Reilly Opelka//Getty Images
Currently the tallest males player on the tour is Reilly Opelka. The winner of just four titles on the ATP Tour, his greatest result at a major has been reaching the fourth round of the 2021 US Open.
Injuries have somewhat stifled his career. Reilly missed the entire 2023 season, and whilst 2024 hasn’t proved to be too kind to the towering giant – it has been brilliant to see him on the tour again.
Reilly Opelka//Getty Images
Reilly Opelka//Getty Images
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:05:22.656Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769922241_top-10-tallest-tennis-players-in-2025_featured.png","image_url":null},{"id":1042,"title":"Arthur Ashe Stadium Capacity: How Many Fans Can It Hold?","slug":"arthur-ashe-stadium-capacity-how-many-fans-can-it-hold-","excerpt":"Arthur Ashe, the gem of New York City – well at least from a tennis perspective! The stadium, which opened in 1997, is the largest tennis-specific ven","content_html":"Arthur Ashe, the gem of New York City – well at least from a tennis perspective! The stadium, which opened in 1997, is the largest tennis-specific venue in the world, boasting a total capacity of over 23 000.
It is the marquee stadium and centre court at the US Open and is named after the first winner of the men’s singles tournament in 1968. Over the years, it has no doubt witnessed countless remarkable tennis encounters and housed the world’s biggest stars.
Home to the Rotterdam Open, this arena is the third-biggest tennis stadium in the world.
Arguably the biggest tennis tournament outside of the four Grand Slams – Indian Wells is the second biggest tennis stadium in the world.
Incredibly the biggest tennis stadium in the world is over 7500 seats bigger than any other in the world of tennis.
![\"Legendary](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FLegendary_Tennis_Professional_Arthur_Ashe_Holding_Racquet_27f5e3522e.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Tennis Professional Arthur Ashe//Getty Images
The stadium pays tribute to Arthur Robert Ashe, Jr. He was born in Richmond Virginia and began playing tennis from the age of just ten years old. In 1966, Arthur graduated from the University of California, where he won the United States Intercollegiate Singles Championship and led his university team to an NCAA championship.
However, it was in 1968 that he would put his name down in history for good. Ashe went on to be crowned the US Open champion and later was ranked as the number one tennis player in the United States.
By 1979, Ashe suffered with heart problems and was forced to retire from the game he loved. He underwent heart surgery later that year and again in 1983. Arthur Ashe used his fame to speak out against societal injustice, famously condemning (and protesting against) the South African Apartheid government. All of this would earn him the 1992 Sports illustrated Sportsman of the Year.
Arthur passed away at the age of 49 due to pneumonia.
Tennis Professional Arthur Ashe//Getty Images
Tennis Professional Arthur Ashe//Getty Images
Did you know that the courts of Arthur Ashe were not always blue? Until 2005, the courts were in fact green! However, it became increasingly difficult for players to see the ball and so the courts were changed to blue.
Did you know that the courts of Arthur Ashe were not always blue? Until 2005, the courts were in fact green! However, it became increasingly difficult for players to see the ball and so the courts were changed to blue.
Did you know that the courts of Arthur Ashe were not always blue? Until 2005, the courts were in fact green! However, it became increasingly difficult for players to see the ball and so the courts were changed to blue.
Did you know that the courts of Arthur Ashe were not always blue? Until 2005, the courts were in fact green! However, it became increasingly difficult for players to see the ball and so the courts were changed to blue.
Did you know that the courts of Arthur Ashe were not always blue? Until 2005, the courts were in fact green! However, it became increasingly difficult for players to see the ball and so the courts were changed to blue.
Arthur Ashe is memorialised in the stadium with a bronze statue sculpted by Mr Eric Fischl. The piece is called Soul in flight and was unveiled on the 28th of August 2000. The memorial is said to depict the two great loves of Ashe – education (represented by the books) and tennis (represented by the racket placed in his hand). The statue also holds an inscription – “From what we get, we can make a living; what we give, however, makes a life”.
Once Arthur Ashe was constructed and opened in 1997, the stadium replaced Louis Armstrong Stadium as the main facility, and became the headquarters of the National Tennis Center. Costing a whopping $254 million, the 23 000 seat stadium not only functions as the host for the US Open. During the remainder of the calendar year, the courts are open to the public and often house many events.
The US Open is a Grand Slam – that is to say it is considered to be one of the most prestigious competitions in tennis. The most recent winners include the likes of Jannick Sinner, Aryna Sabalenka, Rafa Nadal and Serena Williams.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:05:16.663Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769915966_arthur-ashe-stadium-capacity-how-many-fans-can-it-hold-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1041,"title":"Why do Tennis Players Blow on Their Hands? Answered!","slug":"why-do-tennis-players-blow-on-their-hands-answered-","excerpt":"The quirky, often unusual and perplexing actions of tennis players certainly have their place in the sport. However, if you were to watch a tennis mat","content_html":"The quirky, often unusual and perplexing actions of tennis players certainly have their place in the sport. However, if you were to watch a tennis match, you would no doubt see at least one player blow onto their hands or fingers at some point. Why? Be it habit or some other reason, we’ve unpacked it!
During the warm summer months, humidity plays quite a strenuous role, especially at the highest level. The grip on the racket becomes slippery – extenuated by the sweaty palms of the players. There are of course numerous ways in which to counter this, professional players will often change the grip on their actual racket, use a sweat towel, or even apply chalk or gels. However, in the heat of combat, the cooling effect of blowing on their fingers gives an instant (albeit short lasting) result.
Yes, the habit of blowing on your hands may look horribly awkward and unnatural to the casual viewer, but it amongst the most common reasons for blowing on your fingers during a tennis match. The reality is a sweaty palm and grip will significantly hamper the performance of a player. Its impractical to use your towel after every point or to change your grip – and when you are competing for the highest honours, it is every minor detail which may give you match point.
Once the weather becomes somewhat chilly – especially on the outdoor courts – you will once again see tennis players blowing onto their hands and fingers. We can assume that the hot breath warms up their hands, even for a few seconds, giving them a bit of relief.
In really cold environments, your hands would naturally get quite numb and therefore adversely affect the grip you have on the racket. Again, it would be through blowing on their hands and fingers that they are able to give themselves relief. Thankfully, there are very few top level games which are played in winter.
The reality is that for many players, the margin of error is miniscule. Anything and everything which could give a player the edge on their opponent is taken advantage of – and rightly so! It’s a game of small margins, the difference between a championship and nothing is often just a single point.
Some players even attempt to blow onto their racket strings and beam in chilly conditions! This is done to try and limit the rigidness of the racket in cooler climates.
Some players even attempt to blow onto their racket strings and beam in chilly conditions! This is done to try and limit the rigidness of the racket in cooler climates.
Some players even attempt to blow onto their racket strings and beam in chilly conditions! This is done to try and limit the rigidness of the racket in cooler climates.
Some players even attempt to blow onto their racket strings and beam in chilly conditions! This is done to try and limit the rigidness of the racket in cooler climates.
Some players even attempt to blow onto their racket strings and beam in chilly conditions! This is done to try and limit the rigidness of the racket in cooler climates.
Whilst tennis players are often these mentally tough and tenacious athletes, often they also rely on seemingly nonsensical processes and routines. The experienced amongst us might have already picked up on many of these, but for the novice tennis fan – this might bowl you over.
Each time Richard Gasquet wins a point on his serve, he insists that the ball is returned for his next serve. And likewise, if he is to lose the point on the serve, he will sort through balls until he finds the one which he won his last serve.
As you may have assumed – he’s definitely one of the favourite among the ball boys and girls…
Serena was another player devoted to superstitions. She would lament, after a shock defeat in the French Open in 2007, that the reason for her defeat was the fact that she didn’t tie her laces properly. Furthermore, she had to travel with the same bags, and wear the same socks!
Again, given that she went on to become one of the greatest of all time to play the game, we would say it worked.
As a point of departure, our word count wouldn’t allow for us to accurately capture all of Nadal’s quirks! You would of surely noted his constant hair and face wipe, or his somewhat strange underwear ruffling before serving. Oh but there is more, much more. He will always take two bottles of water onto court (one with warm water and the other with cold), he will always do a box jump after the coin toss and sprint to the service line thereafter.
The most famous one of all though – and you would have seen this done on numerous occasions – is he is guaranteed to bite the trophy of a Wimbledon win!
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:05:03.088Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769902650_why-do-tennis-players-blow-on-their-hands-answered-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1040,"title":"What is the fastest tennis serve ever recorded?","slug":"what-is-the-fastest-tennis-serve-ever-recorded-","excerpt":"The fasted serve in tennis ever recorded poses a bit of a dilemma owing to the technicalities around the recognition of serves by both the ATP and WTA","content_html":"The fasted serve in tennis ever recorded poses a bit of a dilemma owing to the technicalities around the recognition of serves by both the ATP and WTA.
Recorded in 2012 at the Busan Open in South Korea, the fastest serve was achieved by a right-handed Australian tennis player who had no acclaim in the sport, still finding his way in second-tier Challenger events.
In this article, we look at the fastest serve ever recorded and discuss the residual implications surrounding that record.
Ranked No.340 in the world and the former husband of fellow Aussie tennis player Jarmila Gajdosova, Sam Groth struck a thunderous serve against Belarus’ Vladzimir Ignatik.
Groth’s record-setting serve was clocked at an impressive 163.7 mph (263.4 km/h), surpassing Croat Ivo Karlovic’s record from the previous year in a doubles match at the Davis Cup, which stood at 156.0 (251.1 km/h).
The Aussie’s serve was a monumental feat considering how far it eclipsed the standing record as compared to other record-breaking serves. Groth obliterated Karlovic’s record by a staggering 7.7 mph (12.3 km/h), far greater than other players who merely shaved their peers’ records.
The record serve did, however, not translate into a victory as he was beaten by his opponent on the day, and to add insult to injury, his record was not officially recognised by the ATP.
Although Groth set a remarkable achievement for himself, it is somewhat of a bitter pill to swallow that his record is not recognised by the body he subscribed to as a professional tennis player. The ATP’s rules around speed guns used at Challenger Events are somewhat self-contradictory.
The body does not recognise speed data from Challenger Events for several reasons, some of which suggest that the serve-speed guns used at that level are not of the highest standards, not very accurate and tend to have technical issues.
This might be frustrating for tennis players, as well as other stakeholders in the sport such as analysts and statisticians, since the equipment used at the Busan Open and other Challenger events was approved by the ATP.
The data from Busan was confirmed by the ATP making an announcement several days later, further corroborating its veracity and suggesting that it all appeared within normal range.
Depending on how one views the standard measure of records and the contradictory nature of the ATP’s rules, Sam Groth’s serve is not officially recognised as number 1. That does not take away from the fact that he set a record, and a pronouncement was made upon it by the profession’s highest body.
Therefore, whenever mention is made of the fastest serve in tennis, his name will come up first before anyone delves into the semantics pertaining to the rules of ranking the fastest.
Josh Isner, who is third overall in terms of rankings after Albano Olivetti, whose 160 mph (257.5 km/h) serve set at the 2012 Internazionali Trofeo Lame Perrel-Faip in France is also not recognised by the ATP, is officially recognised as tennis’ holder of the fastest serve. His came in 2016 at the Davis Cup in a singles event, at 157.2 mph (253.0 km/h) and still stands at the time of writing.
With that in mind, let’s have a look at the top 5 serves in both the male and female divisions of tennis.
The fastest serve at Wimbledon belongs to Taylor Dent whose 136.7 mph (220 km/h) in a doubles match from 2010 stands till today.
The fastest serve at Wimbledon belongs to Taylor Dent whose 136.7 mph (220 km/h) in a doubles match from 2010 stands till today.
The fastest serve at Wimbledon belongs to Taylor Dent whose 136.7 mph (220 km/h) in a doubles match from 2010 stands till today.
The fastest serve at Wimbledon belongs to Taylor Dent whose 136.7 mph (220 km/h) in a doubles match from 2010 stands till today.
The fastest serve at Wimbledon belongs to Taylor Dent whose 136.7 mph (220 km/h) in a doubles match from 2010 stands till today.
| Rank | Player | Speed | Event |
| 1 | Sam Groth* | 163.7 mph (263.4 km/h) | Busan Open Challenger, 2012 |
| 2 | Albano Olivetti* | 160.0 mph (257.8 km/h) | Internazionali Trofeo Lame Perrel-Faip, 2012 |
| 3 | John Isner | 157.2 mph (253.0 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2016 |
| 4 | Ivor Karlovic | 156.0 mph (251 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2011 |
| 5 | Jerzy Janowicz* | 156.0 mph (251 km/h) | Pekao Szczean Open, 2012 |
| 6 | Milos Raonic | 155.3 mph (249.9 km/h) | SAP Open, 2012 |
| 7 | Andy Roddick | 155 mph (249.9 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2012 |
| 8 | Chris Guccione* | 154.1 mph (248.0 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2006 |
| 9 | Joachim Johansson* | 152.0 mph (244.6 km/h) | Davis Cup. 2004 |
| 10 | Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard | 152.0 mph (244.6 km/h) | French Open, 2024 |
*Not recognised by the ATP
| Rank | Player | Speed | Event |
| 1 | Sam Groth* | 163.7 mph (263.4 km/h) | Busan Open Challenger, 2012 |
| 2 | Albano Olivetti* | 160.0 mph (257.8 km/h) | Internazionali Trofeo Lame Perrel-Faip, 2012 |
| 3 | John Isner | 157.2 mph (253.0 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2016 |
| 4 | Ivor Karlovic | 156.0 mph (251 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2011 |
| 5 | Jerzy Janowicz* | 156.0 mph (251 km/h) | Pekao Szczean Open, 2012 |
| 6 | Milos Raonic | 155.3 mph (249.9 km/h) | SAP Open, 2012 |
| 7 | Andy Roddick | 155 mph (249.9 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2012 |
| 8 | Chris Guccione* | 154.1 mph (248.0 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2006 |
| 9 | Joachim Johansson* | 152.0 mph (244.6 km/h) | Davis Cup. 2004 |
| 10 | Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard | 152.0 mph (244.6 km/h) | French Open, 2024 |
*Not recognised by the ATP
| Rank | Player | Speed | Event |
| 1 | Sam Groth* | 163.7 mph (263.4 km/h) | Busan Open Challenger, 2012 |
| 2 | Albano Olivetti* | 160.0 mph (257.8 km/h) | Internazionali Trofeo Lame Perrel-Faip, 2012 |
| 3 | John Isner | 157.2 mph (253.0 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2016 |
| 4 | Ivor Karlovic | 156.0 mph (251 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2011 |
| 5 | Jerzy Janowicz* | 156.0 mph (251 km/h) | Pekao Szczean Open, 2012 |
| 6 | Milos Raonic | 155.3 mph (249.9 km/h) | SAP Open, 2012 |
| 7 | Andy Roddick | 155 mph (249.9 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2012 |
| 8 | Chris Guccione* | 154.1 mph (248.0 km/h) | Davis Cup, 2006 |
| 9 | Joachim Johansson* | 152.0 mph (244.6 km/h) | Davis Cup. 2004 |
| 10 | Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard | 152.0 mph (244.6 km/h) | French Open, 2024 |
*Not recognised by the ATP
We believe that to not be the case as was seen in Groth’s record-setting serve match against Uladzimir Ignatik. However, considering the dynamism in tennis matches, it might sway the overall match result.
| Rank | Player | Speed | Event |
| 1 | Georgina Garcia Perez* | 136.7 mph (220 km/h) | Hungarian Ladies Open, 2018 |
| 2 | Aryna Sabalenka* | 133.0 mph (214 km/h) | WTA Elite Trophy, 2018 |
| 3 | Sabine Lisicki | 131.0 mph (210.8 km/h) | Standford, 2014 |
| 4 | Venus Williams | 129.0 mph (207.6 km/h) | US Open, 2007 |
| 5 | Alycia Parks | 129.0 mph (207.6 km/h) | US Open, 2021 |
| 6 | Serena Williams | 128.6 mph (207 km/h) | Australian Open, 2013 |
| 7 | Coco Gauff | 128.0 mph (206 km/h) | US Open, 2022 |
| 8 | Naomi Osaka | 127.4 mph (205 km/h) | Abu Dhabi Open, 2024 |
| 9 | Elena Rybakina* | 126.8 mph (204 km/h) | Abu Dhabi Open, 2024 |
| 10 | Caroline Garcia* | 126.1 mph (203 km/h) | Fed Cup, 2013 |
*Not recognised by the WTA
| Rank | Player | Speed | Event |
| 1 | Georgina Garcia Perez* | 136.7 mph (220 km/h) | Hungarian Ladies Open, 2018 |
| 2 | Aryna Sabalenka* | 133.0 mph (214 km/h) | WTA Elite Trophy, 2018 |
| 3 | Sabine Lisicki | 131.0 mph (210.8 km/h) | Standford, 2014 |
| 4 | Venus Williams | 129.0 mph (207.6 km/h) | US Open, 2007 |
| 5 | Alycia Parks | 129.0 mph (207.6 km/h) | US Open, 2021 |
| 6 | Serena Williams | 128.6 mph (207 km/h) | Australian Open, 2013 |
| 7 | Coco Gauff | 128.0 mph (206 km/h) | US Open, 2022 |
| 8 | Naomi Osaka | 127.4 mph (205 km/h) | Abu Dhabi Open, 2024 |
| 9 | Elena Rybakina* | 126.8 mph (204 km/h) | Abu Dhabi Open, 2024 |
| 10 | Caroline Garcia* | 126.1 mph (203 km/h) | Fed Cup, 2013 |
*Not recognised by the WTA
| Rank | Player | Speed | Event |
| 1 | Georgina Garcia Perez* | 136.7 mph (220 km/h) | Hungarian Ladies Open, 2018 |
| 2 | Aryna Sabalenka* | 133.0 mph (214 km/h) | WTA Elite Trophy, 2018 |
| 3 | Sabine Lisicki | 131.0 mph (210.8 km/h) | Standford, 2014 |
| 4 | Venus Williams | 129.0 mph (207.6 km/h) | US Open, 2007 |
| 5 | Alycia Parks | 129.0 mph (207.6 km/h) | US Open, 2021 |
| 6 | Serena Williams | 128.6 mph (207 km/h) | Australian Open, 2013 |
| 7 | Coco Gauff | 128.0 mph (206 km/h) | US Open, 2022 |
| 8 | Naomi Osaka | 127.4 mph (205 km/h) | Abu Dhabi Open, 2024 |
| 9 | Elena Rybakina* | 126.8 mph (204 km/h) | Abu Dhabi Open, 2024 |
| 10 | Caroline Garcia* | 126.1 mph (203 km/h) | Fed Cup, 2013 |
*Not recognised by the WTA
In 2018, the tennis serve record holder retired following the Australian Open where he lost in singles qualifying and made it as far as the quarter-finals in doubles with former world no. 1 Lleyton Hewitt.
Groth’s transition to politics was preceded by a stint as a host on Postcards for the Nine Network television network. In politics, he has more success than he had in his tennis career, having won a seat for the Liberal Party in the electoral district of Nepean.
His highest ranking in the ATP Singles events was No. 53 in August 2015 and No. 24 in doubles in the very same year in February. As far as titles go, luck or the brute ability to secure one were not on his side with his best singles result being a semi-final appearance at the 2014 Hall of fame Tennis Champions.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:04:53.222Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769892576_what-is-the-fastest-tennis-serve-ever-recorded-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1039,"title":"Explained: Why Tennis Balls Are Packed in a Pressurised Can","slug":"explained-why-tennis-balls-are-packed-in-a-pressurised-can","excerpt":"No, it’s not simply because of the comforting sensation you get when you pop open a new can of tennis balls – although, if it was up to us, that is re","content_html":"No, it’s not simply because of the comforting sensation you get when you pop open a new can of tennis balls – although, if it was up to us, that is reason enough! The answer is actually because the can’s environment mimics the balls’ internal pressure, ensuring that the bounce, texture and expected characteristics of the ball remain intact.
A new tennis ball has an internal ball pressure of about 14psi, this ensures the ball retains the new ball feel from the moment of manufacturing up until the can is opened. Naturally, the balls begin to lose pressure once the can is opened, and if you are somewhat above average in your ability, the recommended use of the balls are nine games.
From that point on, the bounce of the ball becomes less consistent, the ball loses its firmness and quickly becomes more appropriate for your pet than for your serve and volley!
Thankfully, all tennis balls smell the same! However, in all seriousness, there are three main groups of tennis balls: professional, championship and practice balls. Whilst they all serve their intended purpose, there are a few determining factors as to which is the most appropriate.
This ball is a premium tennis ball. High quality, high level of pressure and can maintain that pressure throughout a competitive match. Often, these balls are discarded after first use (but that is just down to the professional needs of high level tennis), the ball itself is still very much serviceable.
A step down from the professional ball, both in pressure and quality, this is a somewhat more affordable option for your everyday (but still competitive) encounter. These balls are designed to be put through their paces and service multiple games.
As the name suggests, they aren’t intended for a competitive matchup. These are great for ball machines and often find their home in the ball basket for an extended period. These guys have an amazing life span, and so coupled with their price, they often make for a coaches’ best friend.
According to the ATP and WTA standards, a new set of 6 balls is put into a professional tennis match after the first seven games of any given match. Thereafter, new balls are introduced after every nine games.
According to the ATP and WTA standards, a new set of 6 balls is put into a professional tennis match after the first seven games of any given match. Thereafter, new balls are introduced after every nine games.
According to the ATP and WTA standards, a new set of 6 balls is put into a professional tennis match after the first seven games of any given match. Thereafter, new balls are introduced after every nine games.
According to the ATP and WTA standards, a new set of 6 balls is put into a professional tennis match after the first seven games of any given match. Thereafter, new balls are introduced after every nine games.
According to the ATP and WTA standards, a new set of 6 balls is put into a professional tennis match after the first seven games of any given match. Thereafter, new balls are introduced after every nine games.
What about the surface you ask? Well, it certainly plays a role insofar as determining the makeup of the ball. There are four categories of balls influenced by the surface, namely; All-Court, Hard Court, Grass Court and Hi-Altitude.
Ideally for your clay surface or indoor surface. They have a much softer feel, but also a significantly shorter lifespan than their hard court cousins.
Yes, you guessed it! They are meant for hard courts. The feel is a largely more texturised, the ball is woven with more wool for the harder surface and as such are best for your outdoor courts.
These are effectively the All-Court balls, but with a stain resistant model attached to their manufacturing. This is only done so that the grass doesn’t adversely affect the colour of the ball.
The science suggests that at around 4000 feet or higher your average tennis ball flies around, these are then simply manufactured to be played at altitudes of 4000 feet or higher and maintain their expected characteristics.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:04:40.151Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769879752_explained-why-tennis-balls-are-packed-in-a-pressurised-can_featured.png","image_url":null},{"id":1038,"title":"Why does tennis use 15, 30, 40? Explained!","slug":"why-does-tennis-use-15-30-40-explained-","excerpt":"The reason behind tennis’ points system using 15-, 30- and 40 to denote scores is obscured behind an ambiguous historical veil. No one can outrightly ","content_html":"The reason behind tennis’ points system using 15-, 30- and 40 to denote scores is obscured behind an ambiguous historical veil.
No one can outrightly explain it without the ambiguity causing some sort of confusion. However, tennis scores, although seeming complex, are pretty much straightforward as you will see.
Having probably searched and traversed the internet trying to understand the complexities of this points system, you must probably still be confused. Here, we take a deep dive into explaining why tennis uses 15-, 30- and 40 as points for scoring, in the simplest fashion.
Medieval France is generally referenced as the period where 15-, 30-, and 40 points originated from, with a 1435 ballad making mention of quarante sinq (“forty-five”), said to have given rise to 40.
There are other obscure theories of course such as text recorded in Latin in the form of a sentence saying, “we are winning 15, we are winning 30”, but the clock seems to be the most prominent, although it can be debunked as we will show here.
Moving the minute hand quarterly on clock faces to denote scores of 15-, 30- and 45 is perhaps the most logical of all the origin theories out there. It just makes sense if you investigate it clearly, but it’s still debateable because clocks in the 15th century measured only hours.
We find this theory to be more alluring than the others, perhaps because of some bias but it just hits different. The precursor to tennis, jeu de paume was played using the hand and was popular before the French Revolution.
Here’s where it gets interesting, crunch the numbers with us and you’ll see where our bias is derived from. The traditional jeu de paume court was 9- feet in length with 45 feet on each end.
A server moved 15 feet closer after scoring, another 15 feet after scoring again and an additional 10 feet after scoring the third. Now, we might be jumping the gun or drawing conclusions like conspiracy theorists, but that’s surely 15, 30 and 40, isn’t it?
It’s clear that the history behind the scoring system is contested and very ambiguous but there is a way to simplify this complex scoring system for the tennis novice. It does seem complicated at first sight but is straightforward as far as we see it.
Jeu de paume had over 1000 courts alone in Paris. That’s how popular the sport was during that era.
Jeu de paume had over 1000 courts alone in Paris. That’s how popular the sport was during that era.
Jeu de paume had over 1000 courts alone in Paris. That’s how popular the sport was during that era.
Jeu de paume had over 1000 courts alone in Paris. That’s how popular the sport was during that era.
Jeu de paume had over 1000 courts alone in Paris. That’s how popular the sport was during that era.
A tennis match works in three phases: a game, a set and a match.
Game: A game is played until a player wins by four or more points.
Set: A set is the collection of games played until a player wins six games or more.
Match: A match is played to the best of three or five sets.
The scoring system tennis uses is somewhat complex and often leaves newcomers confused. But once they have an understanding behind the fundamentals it becomes simplified.
| Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | |
| Player A | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Player B | 4 | 7 | 1 |
| Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | |
| Player A | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Player B | 4 | 7 | 1 |
| Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | |
| Player A | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Player B | 4 | 7 | 1 |
| 0 Points | Love |
| 1 Point | 15 |
| 2 Points | 30 |
| 3 Points | 40 |
| Tied score | All |
| 40-40 | Deuce |
| Server wins deuce point | Ad-in |
| Receiver wins deuce point | Ad-out |
| 0 Points | Love |
| 1 Point | 15 |
| 2 Points | 30 |
| 3 Points | 40 |
| Tied score | All |
| 40-40 | Deuce |
| Server wins deuce point | Ad-in |
| Receiver wins deuce point | Ad-out |
| 0 Points | Love |
| 1 Point | 15 |
| 2 Points | 30 |
| 3 Points | 40 |
| Tied score | All |
| 40-40 | Deuce |
| Server wins deuce point | Ad-in |
| Receiver wins deuce point | Ad-out |
With the above examples in mind, we will explain how the scores work to put 15-, 30- and 40 into context.
A game of tennis starts with both players at zero, which is known as ‘love’ in tennis jargon. The game is won when a player scores four or more points as follows: 15-, 30-, 40 and the match winning point.
From the second table we can see that 1 denotes 15, 2 denotes 30 and 3 denotes 40. That pretty much helps solve what might be a complex scoring system in the mind of a tennis novice without having to go all the way back to medieval France.
Love is the point or beginning of the game where both players are at zero points each.
The elaborate nature of tennis scores will make you feel like the players have been at it for hours on end with such big scores per point.
However, that is not the case. It is pretty much simple to determine the points without delving deeper into the historical context which not only confuses but is ambiguous and funny.
Even funnier is how 45 became 40, as per the many theories doing the rounds. We already mentioned a 1435 ballad, but this one will leave you in stitches.
Please trust that we did not make this up. It’s said that 45 was hard to say while playing so it was shortened to 40.
See how ridiculous it sounds, because why would players need to shout ‘45’ at the top of their lungs whilst striking the ball. Where were the umpires or score keepers of the time?
We believe it to be as easy as 1,2,3. It is not that complicated if looked at from that angle. Whenever you come across a tennis scorecard just know that the numbers denote the figures we have up on the left column in our second table.
It won’t be easy at first, but once you understand the ins and outs, tennis matches will be much more exciting to watch, and you might just end up being a fountain of knowledge for the newbies.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:04:28.701Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769868130_why-does-tennis-use-15-30-40-explained-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1037,"title":"Longest Tennis Match Ever: Who Played and Won?","slug":"longest-tennis-match-ever-who-played-and-won-","excerpt":"11 hours and 5 minutes, that is how long it took John Isner to defeat Nicolas Mahut at Wimbledon back in 2010. Their first-round match on court no. 18","content_html":"11 hours and 5 minutes, that is how long it took John Isner to defeat Nicolas Mahut at Wimbledon back in 2010. Their first-round match on court no. 18 would become the longest tennis match in history!
Tennis is a sport of endurance, long rallies, heart-stopping sets and marathon matches requiring players to often go to unchartered physical and emotional waters. These athletes are isolated, held in fierce competition and all the while knowing that just one lapse in concentration can result in them coming away with nothing to show for it.
Here is a look at the longest tennis match in history, alongside some of the longest at a Grand Slam.
When John Isner and Nicolas Mahut walked out onto court no. 18 in a first round match at Wimbledon, nobody would have expected their match to last all of three days.
Yes, you read that correctly – the match started on the 22nd of June and came to a thrilling end on the 24th of June. The close encounter saw Isner fight back from two sets to one, taking the match to a decider. It should be noted that back then Wimbledon didn’t have a tiebreaker in the fifth set.
Incredibly, the scorecard read 6-4, 3-6, 6-7 (7-9), 7-6 (7-3), 70-68. The numbers around court 18 grew considerably, the media coverage was understandably immense and the manner in which Isner dropped to the ground after winning the match perfectly captured the joy, and exhaustion, needed to earn a spot in the second round.
Ironically, Isner would lose his next match to Thiemo de Bakker in 74 minutes – the shortest men’s match in Wimbledon history at the time.
Tennis players are often known for changing their playing shirts due to sweat. John Isner (possibly) holds the record though, changing his shirt 11 times in a single match! He would later blame the fact that he weighs 110kg…
Tennis players are often known for changing their playing shirts due to sweat. John Isner (possibly) holds the record though, changing his shirt 11 times in a single match! He would later blame the fact that he weighs 110kg…
Tennis players are often known for changing their playing shirts due to sweat. John Isner (possibly) holds the record though, changing his shirt 11 times in a single match! He would later blame the fact that he weighs 110kg…
Tennis players are often known for changing their playing shirts due to sweat. John Isner (possibly) holds the record though, changing his shirt 11 times in a single match! He would later blame the fact that he weighs 110kg…
Tennis players are often known for changing their playing shirts due to sweat. John Isner (possibly) holds the record though, changing his shirt 11 times in a single match! He would later blame the fact that he weighs 110kg…
The 2018 semi-final at Wimbledon would be the second-longest Grand Slam match in history. Again, John Isner was involved, however, this time he came off second best to Kevin Anderson.
The South African earned a spot in the final against Novak Djokovic, by beating Isner after 6 hours and 36 minutes on Centre Court. This match had a total of 99 games, with the fifth set alone lasting just shy of 3 hours.
Lasting just 7 minutes shy of 6 hours long, this Australian Open final is widely considered as one of the best matches of the Open Era! Novak Djokovic would ultimately go on to win the match, and at the time claim his fifth Grand Slam title.
Rafa Nadal, even as the ultimate competitor, conceded that he was satisfied with the result. This was after acknowledging what it took out of both players. Famously, both players could not stand for the duration of the post-match presentation and in a slight deviation from tradition, participated in the presentation seated.
Just a few months ago, in their first round match at the US Open, Dan Evans needed 5 hours and 35 minutes to defeat Karen Khachanov. Astonishingly, Evans came back from being 0-4 in the deciding set to eventually clinch a spot in the second round and eliminate his Russian counterpart.
This match would not just rank amongst the longest in Grand Slam history, but also as the longest at Flushing Meadows. The previous record between Stefan Edberg and Michael Chang had managed to stand since 1992.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:04:15.868Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769855274_longest-tennis-match-ever-who-played-and-won-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1036,"title":"Understanding Tennis Scoring: How Many Sets in a Match?","slug":"understanding-tennis-scoring-how-many-sets-in-a-match-","excerpt":"Sets in a tennis match give us a story of how the match went, who won and by what score. Each tennis match has a prescribed number of sets. Either a b","content_html":"Sets in a tennis match give us a story of how the match went, who won and by what score. Each tennis match has a prescribed number of sets.
Either a best of three or best of five sets. In the former, the player who wins two out of three sets wins the match, while winning three out five sets in the latter similarly wins a match.
Set scores are easy to determine. In the first set for instance, a score reflecting 6-4 informs us that a player has won six games, by a margin of two over their opponent with four.
We explore the number of sets in a tennis match and how they work in this article.
As we have already alluded to above, a tennis match employs either a best of three or best of five sets.
A best of three is more commonly used across the spectrum and for female’s singles and doubles.
The best of five is usually used in the men’s matches, so to do they use the best of three.
From that it’s pretty much clear to deduce that a tennis match consists of either three sets or five sets, depending on the rules of the event. Something like this:
Game A: Three Set Match
| Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 |
Game B: Five Set Match
| Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
It’s like four quarters in a basketball game or two halves in a football game. Sports formats are not that polarised or far apart in terms of similarities, and tennis’ sophistication doesn’t make it that much of an outlier from the others.
The scores of a complete match my be given in either of two ways. By presenting the sets won or with set’s scores given separately.
We prefer the latter, as it gives a clearer break down of what happened in each set, as opposed to a shorter version given as 2-1 (two sets to one).
Either way, the match winner’s score is stated first. For instance, 7-5, 6-7, 6-4 and 7-6. The match was won by three sets to one.
In a tennis match, sets have two types of formats, an advantage set and a tie break set. We explore each briefly.
An advantage set is played until either player has won at least six games and continues without a tie breaker. That means at 6-6, there is no tie breaker, the game continues until one player wins by a two-game advantage.
This type of set has the potential of going on for longer periods and doesn’t result in timeous conclusions of sets, as was witnessed in a match between John Isner and Nicolas Mahut in the man’s first round of the 2010 Wimbledon.
The fifth set of this historical match was played for eight hours and eleven minutes, with the set scored recorded at 70- 68, won by the American, John Isner.
Advantage sets are no longer played for tennis tournaments since 2022. The tie break set is the much-preferred format recently.
In a tennis match, sets have two types of formats, an advantage set and a tie break set. We explore each briefly.
The longest tennis match lasted 11 hours and 5 minutes, in 2010, between John Isner and Nicolas Mahut.
The longest tennis match lasted 11 hours and 5 minutes, in 2010, between John Isner and Nicolas Mahut.
The longest tennis match lasted 11 hours and 5 minutes, in 2010, between John Isner and Nicolas Mahut.
The longest tennis match lasted 11 hours and 5 minutes, in 2010, between John Isner and Nicolas Mahut.
The longest tennis match lasted 11 hours and 5 minutes, in 2010, between John Isner and Nicolas Mahut.
In a tie break set, when scores get to 6-6, a tie break game is used to break the deadlock. The first player to reach seven points in the tie break game or win by an advantage of two games wins the set.
Although tie break sets can also last a long time, they are, however, significantly shorter than an advantage set.
There are alternative set scoring formats to the traditional six games to win found in tie breaks or advantage sets. These aren’t commonly used in contemporary pro tennis but are found in the game, nonetheless.
This set format is played until one player wins eight or nine games, with a margin of two games. The tie break is played at eight or nine all.
Officially not recognised by the ITF, nor played in modern professional tennis, the format is found in amateur leagues and high school tennis but was supposedly used in early professional tours.
The set’s format is played until one player wins four games with a margin of two games. The ‘short’ in this format is very telling if we may say. The tie break is played at four games all.
The Davis Cup was used as a tester by the IFT in low level matches. Despite its discontinuation, it remains an acceptable alternative in ITF rules.
A tie break set could either have an ‘advantage final set’ or ‘tie break set’, either of which had to be announced in advance of the event.
However, as has been witnessed with the length of final sets in tennis matches, particularly in advantages sets, new rules were announced in 2022.
The Grand Slam Board, in consultation with the WTA, ATP and ITF announced that in all four major tournaments, a new tie break format will be used in final sets.
That is, the third set for women’s singles, and the fifth set for men’s singles. At 6-6, in a final set, players will play a ten-point tie breaker game to determine the match winner.
Like seven-point tie breakers, the first player to reach ten points by at least a margin of two points wins the match. If the score is tied at 9-9, a player must win two more points to win a set, and so on.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:04:05.384Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769844754_understanding-tennis-scoring-how-many-sets-in-a-match-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1035,"title":"How Does a Tie Break Work in Tennis? Quick Guide!","slug":"how-does-a-tie-break-work-in-tennis-quick-guide-","excerpt":"Tie breaks are a crucial part of the game of tennis . A tie break helps determine the outcome and brings sets that would continue indefinitely to a ti","content_html":"Tie breaks are a crucial part of the game of tennis. A tie break helps determine the outcome and brings sets that would continue indefinitely to a timely conclusion.
When scores in a tennis set are tied at 6-6 and neither player can secure a two-game lead, tie breaks are triggered to break the deadlock and determine the set winner.
We delve into tie breaks in this quick guide to help you understand their rules and how they sway the overall outcome of a tennis match.
Context does really matter, so allow us to refresh your memory quickly before we get into the nitty-gritty of tie breakers to give you a clearer picture.
Rhymes well and would probably pass off greatly in a rap verse, but that’s not the case here unfortunately, or otherwise. A traditional game of tennis is played in sets, games, and the overall result being the match.
The number of sets may vary in a tennis match, from the best out of three or five sets, which require a player to win a minimum of six games by a margin of two to win the set.
That would be 6-4 for instance. Set won, and on to the next.
The overall match winner is determined by the number of sets won. Hence, ‘match’, in ‘game, set, match’. There you go, you have your winner. Simple enough? Let’s have a look at the following table for more clarity.
| Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 | |
| Player A | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Player B | 1 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
In the five-set match, we used as an example, Player A won three sets as compared to Player B’s two, therefore, winning the overall match.
The juice, however, for our quick guide on the tie break lies in the scores in each respective set. As we can see in the table, there was no point at which the scores were tied at 6-6, therefore, a tie break game was not necessary.
Scores in a set tied at 6-6 with neither player able to lead the game by two points trigger a tie break to break the deadlock by employing a special game or mini game to determine the set’s winner.
In this scenario, players will be required to compete in the tie break game with the aim of reaching seven points first, leading by two points. For instance, 7-5.
If this is not the case and players are tied at 6-6, they will continue playing until one player attains a two-point lead to win the tie break game.
Scores can go as high as 10-18 or 15-17 because there is not limit, and this is probably what makes tie breaks so exciting and alluring.
This goes for both singles and doubles with the only difference between the two being the serve.
Once the tie break game is over, the set score is recorded as 7-6. The tie break score is immaterial in that regard.
Let’s switch up our table above with one or two sets needing a tie break to illustrate further.
John Isner has played in the most tie breakers in men’s tennis, as well as won the most.
John Isner has played in the most tie breakers in men’s tennis, as well as won the most.
John Isner has played in the most tie breakers in men’s tennis, as well as won the most.
John Isner has played in the most tie breakers in men’s tennis, as well as won the most.
John Isner has played in the most tie breakers in men’s tennis, as well as won the most.
| Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 | |
| Player A | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Player B | 7 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
Here Player B won the overall game by three sets, however, needed a tie break to win the first set. The fourth set also needed a tie break, and it would have been exciting were it a real game of tennis. We will show you why.
Player A would have won the best of five match had he won the fourth set at 2-1, just needing one more set, but couldn’t because Player B probably dug deep.
This forced the game into a tie break at 6-6, which he eventually won to give him set four and tie the match at 2-2.
Just play it out in your head, its thrilling! Blockbuster stuff if we may say.
There are two different ways a tie break can be played. The principles are still the same to what we’ve already alluded to, but owing to tennis being a sophisticated sport, we will break it down briefly for you.
There are two different ways a tie break can be played. The principles are still the same to what we’ve already alluded to, but owing to tennis being a sophisticated sport, we will break it down briefly for you.
There are two different ways a tie break can be played. The principles are still the same to what we’ve already alluded to, but owing to tennis being a sophisticated sport, we will break it down briefly for you.
This tie breaker is basically what we’ve described a tie breaker to be. A first to seven but is referred to as a 12-point tie breaker because it’s a best of 12 points won by two, 7-5. See the mathematical logic there?
A first to ten points tie breaker, with a win by two points as well. The 10-point tie breaker is often referred to as super tie breaker.
This tie breaker is basically what we’ve described a tie breaker to be. A first to seven but is referred to as a 12-point tie breaker because it’s a best of 12 points won by two, 7-5. See the mathematical logic there?
This tie breaker is basically what we’ve described a tie breaker to be. A first to seven but is referred to as a 12-point tie breaker because it’s a best of 12 points won by two, 7-5. See the mathematical logic there?
This tie breaker is basically what we’ve described a tie breaker to be. A first to seven but is referred to as a 12-point tie breaker because it’s a best of 12 points won by two, 7-5. See the mathematical logic there?
This tie breaker is basically what we’ve described a tie breaker to be. A first to seven but is referred to as a 12-point tie breaker because it’s a best of 12 points won by two, 7-5. See the mathematical logic there?
This tie breaker is basically what we’ve described a tie breaker to be. A first to seven but is referred to as a 12-point tie breaker because it’s a best of 12 points won by two, 7-5. See the mathematical logic there?
A first to ten points tie breaker, with a win by two points as well. The 10-point tie breaker is often referred to as super tie breaker.
A first to ten points tie breaker, with a win by two points as well. The 10-point tie breaker is often referred to as super tie breaker.
A first to ten points tie breaker, with a win by two points as well. The 10-point tie breaker is often referred to as super tie breaker.
A first to ten points tie breaker, with a win by two points as well. The 10-point tie breaker is often referred to as super tie breaker.
A first to ten points tie breaker, with a win by two points as well. The 10-point tie breaker is often referred to as super tie breaker.
In a tie breaker, serving alternates at certain intervals, as well as switching sides. This is to avoid giving unfair advantage to one player due to various factors such as crowd support or the elements of weather.
In a tie breaker, serving alternates at certain intervals, as well as switching sides. This is to avoid giving unfair advantage to one player due to various factors such as crowd support or the elements of weather.
In a tie breaker, serving alternates at certain intervals, as well as switching sides. This is to avoid giving unfair advantage to one player due to various factors such as crowd support or the elements of weather.
The player who received to tie the game at 6-6 in the tied set, will begin serving on the deuce side. In simpler terms, the right side of the court. After this, the receiver will serve twice from the advantage court, which is the left side of the court. The pattern, alternating two serves each, continues throughout the tie break.
Switching sides is another interesting dynamic of a tie breaker. Players switch after the first point and at multiples of six afterwards until a winner is determined. That is after every six points in the game. That would be at 7, 13, 19 and so on.
The rules for serving and switching sides in doubles are slightly different, but the characteristics are similar, nonetheless.
The player who received to tie the game at 6-6 in the tied set, will begin serving on the deuce side. In simpler terms, the right side of the court. After this, the receiver will serve twice from the advantage court, which is the left side of the court. The pattern, alternating two serves each, continues throughout the tie break.
The player who received to tie the game at 6-6 in the tied set, will begin serving on the deuce side. In simpler terms, the right side of the court. After this, the receiver will serve twice from the advantage court, which is the left side of the court. The pattern, alternating two serves each, continues throughout the tie break.
The player who received to tie the game at 6-6 in the tied set, will begin serving on the deuce side. In simpler terms, the right side of the court. After this, the receiver will serve twice from the advantage court, which is the left side of the court. The pattern, alternating two serves each, continues throughout the tie break.
The player who received to tie the game at 6-6 in the tied set, will begin serving on the deuce side. In simpler terms, the right side of the court. After this, the receiver will serve twice from the advantage court, which is the left side of the court. The pattern, alternating two serves each, continues throughout the tie break.
The player who received to tie the game at 6-6 in the tied set, will begin serving on the deuce side. In simpler terms, the right side of the court. After this, the receiver will serve twice from the advantage court, which is the left side of the court. The pattern, alternating two serves each, continues throughout the tie break.
Switching sides is another interesting dynamic of a tie breaker. Players switch after the first point and at multiples of six afterwards until a winner is determined. That is after every six points in the game. That would be at 7, 13, 19 and so on.
The rules for serving and switching sides in doubles are slightly different, but the characteristics are similar, nonetheless.
Switching sides is another interesting dynamic of a tie breaker. Players switch after the first point and at multiples of six afterwards until a winner is determined. That is after every six points in the game. That would be at 7, 13, 19 and so on.
The rules for serving and switching sides in doubles are slightly different, but the characteristics are similar, nonetheless.
Switching sides is another interesting dynamic of a tie breaker. Players switch after the first point and at multiples of six afterwards until a winner is determined. That is after every six points in the game. That would be at 7, 13, 19 and so on.
The rules for serving and switching sides in doubles are slightly different, but the characteristics are similar, nonetheless.
Switching sides is another interesting dynamic of a tie breaker. Players switch after the first point and at multiples of six afterwards until a winner is determined. That is after every six points in the game. That would be at 7, 13, 19 and so on.
The rules for serving and switching sides in doubles are slightly different, but the characteristics are similar, nonetheless.
Switching sides is another interesting dynamic of a tie breaker. Players switch after the first point and at multiples of six afterwards until a winner is determined. That is after every six points in the game. That would be at 7, 13, 19 and so on.
The rules for serving and switching sides in doubles are slightly different, but the characteristics are similar, nonetheless.
Novak Djokovic sits at the summit with 66.3%. He has won 334 of the 504 tie breakers he’s competed in.
Let’s jog your memory quickly as we come to the end of this quick but comprehensive guide.
| 1. | A tie breaker helps bring to conclusion a deadlocked set in a tennis match |
| 2. | It takes place at a tied 6-6 score in a set |
| 3. | The aim is to reach seven points first |
| 4. | The set’s score is recorded at 7-6 after the tie break |
| 5. | Alternating the serve and switching sides happens at different intervals |
| 6. | There are different types of tie breakers |
| 7. | We hope we didn’t miss anything, but lastly, tie breakers are thrilling and alluring |
Let’s jog your memory quickly as we come to the end of this quick but comprehensive guide.
| 1. | A tie breaker helps bring to conclusion a deadlocked set in a tennis match |
| 2. | It takes place at a tied 6-6 score in a set |
| 3. | The aim is to reach seven points first |
| 4. | The set’s score is recorded at 7-6 after the tie break |
| 5. | Alternating the serve and switching sides happens at different intervals |
| 6. | There are different types of tie breakers |
| 7. | We hope we didn’t miss anything, but lastly, tie breakers are thrilling and alluring |
Let’s jog your memory quickly as we come to the end of this quick but comprehensive guide.
| 1. | A tie breaker helps bring to conclusion a deadlocked set in a tennis match |
| 2. | It takes place at a tied 6-6 score in a set |
| 3. | The aim is to reach seven points first |
| 4. | The set’s score is recorded at 7-6 after the tie break |
| 5. | Alternating the serve and switching sides happens at different intervals |
| 6. | There are different types of tie breakers |
| 7. | We hope we didn’t miss anything, but lastly, tie breakers are thrilling and alluring |
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:03:51.341Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769830902_how-does-a-tie-break-work-in-tennis-quick-guide-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1034,"title":"Who Has the Most Grand Slam Titles in Tennis History?","slug":"who-has-the-most-grand-slam-titles-in-tennis-history-","excerpt":"Djokovic beat Daniil Medvedev, in straight sets, at the US open in 2023. This saw him claim a third calendar slam that year and draw level with Margar","content_html":"Djokovic beat Daniil Medvedev, in straight sets, at the US open in 2023. This saw him claim a third calendar slam that year and draw level with Margaret Court’s all-time record of 24 titles.
The sport of tennis sees four Grand Slams played a year. The Australian Open, the French Open, Wimbledon and the US Open. These are truly the pinnacle of the sport and the most coveted championships in the sport.
The rankings are based on the following measurable criteria:
The rankings are based on the following measurable criteria:
The rankings are based on the following measurable criteria:
Grand Slam Titles (50%): Number of Grand Slam wins determine the primary ranking factor.
Grand Slam Titles (50%): Number of Grand Slam wins determine the primary ranking factor.
Career Longevity & Impact (30%): Contribution to tennis history, including consistency across decades.
Career Longevity & Impact (30%): Contribution to tennis history, including consistency across decades.
Career Win Percentage in Grand Slams (10%): Success rate in Grand Slam matches.
Career Win Percentage in Grand Slams (10%): Success rate in Grand Slam matches.
Era Dominance (10%): Contextual dominance against peers and in their era.
Era Dominance (10%): Contextual dominance against peers and in their era.
Sources Used:
Sources Used:
So, taking into account the parameters outlined above, these are the players with the most Grand Slam titles ranked.
| Rank | Player | Grand Slam Titles |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic | 24 |
| 2 | Rafael Nadal | 22 |
| 3 | Roger Federer | 20 |
| 4 | Pete Sampras | 14 |
| 5 | Roy Emerson | 12 |
| 6 | Margaret Court | 24 (Women) |
| 7 | Serena Williams | 23 (Women) |
| 8 | Steffi Graf | 22 (Women) |
| 9 | Helen Wills | 19 (Women) |
| 10 | Chris Evert | 18 (Women, tied) |
| 11 | Martina Navratilova | 18 (Women, tied) |
| Rank | Player | Grand Slam Titles |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic | 24 |
| 2 | Rafael Nadal | 22 |
| 3 | Roger Federer | 20 |
| 4 | Pete Sampras | 14 |
| 5 | Roy Emerson | 12 |
| 6 | Margaret Court | 24 (Women) |
| 7 | Serena Williams | 23 (Women) |
| 8 | Steffi Graf | 22 (Women) |
| 9 | Helen Wills | 19 (Women) |
| 10 | Chris Evert | 18 (Women, tied) |
| 11 | Martina Navratilova | 18 (Women, tied) |
| Rank | Player | Grand Slam Titles |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic | 24 |
| 2 | Rafael Nadal | 22 |
| 3 | Roger Federer | 20 |
| 4 | Pete Sampras | 14 |
| 5 | Roy Emerson | 12 |
| 6 | Margaret Court | 24 (Women) |
| 7 | Serena Williams | 23 (Women) |
| 8 | Steffi Graf | 22 (Women) |
| 9 | Helen Wills | 19 (Women) |
| 10 | Chris Evert | 18 (Women, tied) |
| 11 | Martina Navratilova | 18 (Women, tied) |
MetaScale Calculation Overview:
MetaScale Calculation Overview:
MetaScale Calculation Overview:
Grand Slam Titles (50%): Weighted for the number of titles won.
Grand Slam Titles (50%): Weighted for the number of titles won.
Career Longevity & Impact (30%): Adjusted for years played and influence.
Career Longevity & Impact (30%): Adjusted for years played and influence.
Win Percentage (10%): Reflects efficiency at Grand Slams.
Win Percentage (10%): Reflects efficiency at Grand Slams.
Era Dominance (10%): Accounts for competitiveness during their prime.
Era Dominance (10%): Accounts for competitiveness during their prime.
| Rank | Player | Grand Slam Titles (50%) | Career Impact (30%) | Win % (10%) | Era Dominance (10%) | Meta Scale Score |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic | 50 | 28 | 9 | 9 | 96 |
| 2 | Rafael Nadal | 46 | 27 | 8 | 9 | 90 |
| 3 | Roger Federer | 40 | 30 | 8 | 7 | 85 |
| 4 | Margaret Court | 50 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 85 |
| 5 | Serena Williams | 46 | 28 | 6 | 4 | 84 |
| 6 | Steffi Graf | 44 | 27 | 7 | 4 | 82 |
| Rank | Player | Grand Slam Titles (50%) | Career Impact (30%) | Win % (10%) | Era Dominance (10%) | Meta Scale Score |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic | 50 | 28 | 9 | 9 | 96 |
| 2 | Rafael Nadal | 46 | 27 | 8 | 9 | 90 |
| 3 | Roger Federer | 40 | 30 | 8 | 7 | 85 |
| 4 | Margaret Court | 50 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 85 |
| 5 | Serena Williams | 46 | 28 | 6 | 4 | 84 |
| 6 | Steffi Graf | 44 | 27 | 7 | 4 | 82 |
| Rank | Player | Grand Slam Titles (50%) | Career Impact (30%) | Win % (10%) | Era Dominance (10%) | Meta Scale Score |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic | 50 | 28 | 9 | 9 | 96 |
| 2 | Rafael Nadal | 46 | 27 | 8 | 9 | 90 |
| 3 | Roger Federer | 40 | 30 | 8 | 7 | 85 |
| 4 | Margaret Court | 50 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 85 |
| 5 | Serena Williams | 46 | 28 | 6 | 4 | 84 |
| 6 | Steffi Graf | 44 | 27 | 7 | 4 | 82 |
He truly has reason to stake a claim as the greatest of all time. A player who has torn through the tennis tour, devastated rankings and records all over the place and etching his name in history from the moment he stepped foot on the tour.
The Spanish maestro might have been prolific on a particular surface, but that doesn’t tell the entire story. Nadal was ranked at No. 1 in singles by the Association of Tennis Professionals for 209 weeks!
For a record 237 consecutive weeks, Federer was ranked as the number one male singles tennis player in the world. He has won over 100 singles titles and retired as one of the greatest the open era has ever seen.
Not only is Magaret Court considered one of the greatest women’s singles tennis players, amassing over 64 major titles in her career – but she is also a Christian minister, serving her community in Australia.
Overcoming seemingly insurmountable odds to win a staggering 23 career grand slams, Serena Williams reinvented the wheel for how women could play tennis – as well as what they could look like while playing! She is a trailblazer and an example for women all over the world.
The German machine won 22 major titles, that puts her in second place for the most won titles in the open era and third of all time. The powerful player was no stranger to success and dominated the 1980s tour.
He truly has reason to stake a claim as the greatest of all time. A player who has torn through the tennis tour, devastated rankings and records all over the place and etching his name in history from the moment he stepped foot on the tour.
He truly has reason to stake a claim as the greatest of all time. A player who has torn through the tennis tour, devastated rankings and records all over the place and etching his name in history from the moment he stepped foot on the tour.
He truly has reason to stake a claim as the greatest of all time. A player who has torn through the tennis tour, devastated rankings and records all over the place and etching his name in history from the moment he stepped foot on the tour.
He truly has reason to stake a claim as the greatest of all time. A player who has torn through the tennis tour, devastated rankings and records all over the place and etching his name in history from the moment he stepped foot on the tour.
He truly has reason to stake a claim as the greatest of all time. A player who has torn through the tennis tour, devastated rankings and records all over the place and etching his name in history from the moment he stepped foot on the tour.
The Spanish maestro might have been prolific on a particular surface, but that doesn’t tell the entire story. Nadal was ranked at No. 1 in singles by the Association of Tennis Professionals for 209 weeks!
The Spanish maestro might have been prolific on a particular surface, but that doesn’t tell the entire story. Nadal was ranked at No. 1 in singles by the Association of Tennis Professionals for 209 weeks!
The Spanish maestro might have been prolific on a particular surface, but that doesn’t tell the entire story. Nadal was ranked at No. 1 in singles by the Association of Tennis Professionals for 209 weeks!
The Spanish maestro might have been prolific on a particular surface, but that doesn’t tell the entire story. Nadal was ranked at No. 1 in singles by the Association of Tennis Professionals for 209 weeks!
The Spanish maestro might have been prolific on a particular surface, but that doesn’t tell the entire story. Nadal was ranked at No. 1 in singles by the Association of Tennis Professionals for 209 weeks!
For a record 237 consecutive weeks, Federer was ranked as the number one male singles tennis player in the world. He has won over 100 singles titles and retired as one of the greatest the open era has ever seen.
For a record 237 consecutive weeks, Federer was ranked as the number one male singles tennis player in the world. He has won over 100 singles titles and retired as one of the greatest the open era has ever seen.
For a record 237 consecutive weeks, Federer was ranked as the number one male singles tennis player in the world. He has won over 100 singles titles and retired as one of the greatest the open era has ever seen.
For a record 237 consecutive weeks, Federer was ranked as the number one male singles tennis player in the world. He has won over 100 singles titles and retired as one of the greatest the open era has ever seen.
For a record 237 consecutive weeks, Federer was ranked as the number one male singles tennis player in the world. He has won over 100 singles titles and retired as one of the greatest the open era has ever seen.
Not only is Magaret Court considered one of the greatest women’s singles tennis players, amassing over 64 major titles in her career – but she is also a Christian minister, serving her community in Australia.
Not only is Magaret Court considered one of the greatest women’s singles tennis players, amassing over 64 major titles in her career – but she is also a Christian minister, serving her community in Australia.
Not only is Magaret Court considered one of the greatest women’s singles tennis players, amassing over 64 major titles in her career – but she is also a Christian minister, serving her community in Australia.
Not only is Magaret Court considered one of the greatest women’s singles tennis players, amassing over 64 major titles in her career – but she is also a Christian minister, serving her community in Australia.
Not only is Magaret Court considered one of the greatest women’s singles tennis players, amassing over 64 major titles in her career – but she is also a Christian minister, serving her community in Australia.
Overcoming seemingly insurmountable odds to win a staggering 23 career grand slams, Serena Williams reinvented the wheel for how women could play tennis – as well as what they could look like while playing! She is a trailblazer and an example for women all over the world.
Overcoming seemingly insurmountable odds to win a staggering 23 career grand slams, Serena Williams reinvented the wheel for how women could play tennis – as well as what they could look like while playing! She is a trailblazer and an example for women all over the world.
Overcoming seemingly insurmountable odds to win a staggering 23 career grand slams, Serena Williams reinvented the wheel for how women could play tennis – as well as what they could look like while playing! She is a trailblazer and an example for women all over the world.
Overcoming seemingly insurmountable odds to win a staggering 23 career grand slams, Serena Williams reinvented the wheel for how women could play tennis – as well as what they could look like while playing! She is a trailblazer and an example for women all over the world.
Overcoming seemingly insurmountable odds to win a staggering 23 career grand slams, Serena Williams reinvented the wheel for how women could play tennis – as well as what they could look like while playing! She is a trailblazer and an example for women all over the world.
The German machine won 22 major titles, that puts her in second place for the most won titles in the open era and third of all time. The powerful player was no stranger to success and dominated the 1980s tour.
The German machine won 22 major titles, that puts her in second place for the most won titles in the open era and third of all time. The powerful player was no stranger to success and dominated the 1980s tour.
The German machine won 22 major titles, that puts her in second place for the most won titles in the open era and third of all time. The powerful player was no stranger to success and dominated the 1980s tour.
The German machine won 22 major titles, that puts her in second place for the most won titles in the open era and third of all time. The powerful player was no stranger to success and dominated the 1980s tour.
The German machine won 22 major titles, that puts her in second place for the most won titles in the open era and third of all time. The powerful player was no stranger to success and dominated the 1980s tour.
Novak is without question the greatest Grand Slam champion in tennis history. He has 24 titles to his name and the dominance with which he has subjected the tennis world to has been sublime. For years he has been in a league of his own – simple as that. Granted, the sun seems to be setting on his illustrious career and the emergence of a new guard in players like Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz (who, themselves have felt what it is like to lift a Grand Slam) dominating the modern circuit. However, Djokovic is a champion and what he has achieved will no doubt stand the test of time!
Court remains tied with Novak Djokovic for the most Grand Slam titles won. She remains a stalwart in the women’s game and she will forever be seen as a true trailblazer for women in the sport of tennis. The era she played in however, simply does not match that of Djokovic – that is at least the debate which sill divides tennis fans across the globe…we’ll leave that up to you to decide.
The undisputed King of Clay, Rafa Nadal, won the French Open title a mammoth 14 times. Not only is this a record in France, but indeed for any player (male or female) in any major tournament. Furthermore, he also holds the record for the most consecutive wins in the Open Era – dominating the clay from 2010 to 2014.
Not to be outdone on the court, however, Serena Williams would no doubt stake a claim for her influence on women’s tennis. Not only did she revolutionise the game with powerful approach and heavy-hitting style – she has simply won more Grand Slams than any other women (in the open era).
Williams won 23 Grand Slams in her career including 13 on hard courts, 7 at the Australian Open (most of any women) and 6 US Open Open titles.
Novak is without question the greatest Grand Slam champion in tennis history. He has 24 titles to his name and the dominance with which he has subjected the tennis world to has been sublime. For years he has been in a league of his own – simple as that. Granted, the sun seems to be setting on his illustrious career and the emergence of a new guard in players like Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz (who, themselves have felt what it is like to lift a Grand Slam) dominating the modern circuit. However, Djokovic is a champion and what he has achieved will no doubt stand the test of time!
Novak is without question the greatest Grand Slam champion in tennis history. He has 24 titles to his name and the dominance with which he has subjected the tennis world to has been sublime. For years he has been in a league of his own – simple as that. Granted, the sun seems to be setting on his illustrious career and the emergence of a new guard in players like Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz (who, themselves have felt what it is like to lift a Grand Slam) dominating the modern circuit. However, Djokovic is a champion and what he has achieved will no doubt stand the test of time!
Novak is without question the greatest Grand Slam champion in tennis history. He has 24 titles to his name and the dominance with which he has subjected the tennis world to has been sublime. For years he has been in a league of his own – simple as that. Granted, the sun seems to be setting on his illustrious career and the emergence of a new guard in players like Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz (who, themselves have felt what it is like to lift a Grand Slam) dominating the modern circuit. However, Djokovic is a champion and what he has achieved will no doubt stand the test of time!
Novak is without question the greatest Grand Slam champion in tennis history. He has 24 titles to his name and the dominance with which he has subjected the tennis world to has been sublime. For years he has been in a league of his own – simple as that. Granted, the sun seems to be setting on his illustrious career and the emergence of a new guard in players like Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz (who, themselves have felt what it is like to lift a Grand Slam) dominating the modern circuit. However, Djokovic is a champion and what he has achieved will no doubt stand the test of time!
Novak is without question the greatest Grand Slam champion in tennis history. He has 24 titles to his name and the dominance with which he has subjected the tennis world to has been sublime. For years he has been in a league of his own – simple as that. Granted, the sun seems to be setting on his illustrious career and the emergence of a new guard in players like Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz (who, themselves have felt what it is like to lift a Grand Slam) dominating the modern circuit. However, Djokovic is a champion and what he has achieved will no doubt stand the test of time!
Court remains tied with Novak Djokovic for the most Grand Slam titles won. She remains a stalwart in the women’s game and she will forever be seen as a true trailblazer for women in the sport of tennis. The era she played in however, simply does not match that of Djokovic – that is at least the debate which sill divides tennis fans across the globe…we’ll leave that up to you to decide.
Court remains tied with Novak Djokovic for the most Grand Slam titles won. She remains a stalwart in the women’s game and she will forever be seen as a true trailblazer for women in the sport of tennis. The era she played in however, simply does not match that of Djokovic – that is at least the debate which sill divides tennis fans across the globe…we’ll leave that up to you to decide.
Court remains tied with Novak Djokovic for the most Grand Slam titles won. She remains a stalwart in the women’s game and she will forever be seen as a true trailblazer for women in the sport of tennis. The era she played in however, simply does not match that of Djokovic – that is at least the debate which sill divides tennis fans across the globe…we’ll leave that up to you to decide.
Court remains tied with Novak Djokovic for the most Grand Slam titles won. She remains a stalwart in the women’s game and she will forever be seen as a true trailblazer for women in the sport of tennis. The era she played in however, simply does not match that of Djokovic – that is at least the debate which sill divides tennis fans across the globe…we’ll leave that up to you to decide.
Court remains tied with Novak Djokovic for the most Grand Slam titles won. She remains a stalwart in the women’s game and she will forever be seen as a true trailblazer for women in the sport of tennis. The era she played in however, simply does not match that of Djokovic – that is at least the debate which sill divides tennis fans across the globe…we’ll leave that up to you to decide.
The undisputed King of Clay, Rafa Nadal, won the French Open title a mammoth 14 times. Not only is this a record in France, but indeed for any player (male or female) in any major tournament. Furthermore, he also holds the record for the most consecutive wins in the Open Era – dominating the clay from 2010 to 2014.
Not to be outdone on the court, however, Serena Williams would no doubt stake a claim for her influence on women’s tennis. Not only did she revolutionise the game with powerful approach and heavy-hitting style – she has simply won more Grand Slams than any other women (in the open era).
Williams won 23 Grand Slams in her career including 13 on hard courts, 7 at the Australian Open (most of any women) and 6 US Open Open titles.
The undisputed King of Clay, Rafa Nadal, won the French Open title a mammoth 14 times. Not only is this a record in France, but indeed for any player (male or female) in any major tournament. Furthermore, he also holds the record for the most consecutive wins in the Open Era – dominating the clay from 2010 to 2014.
Not to be outdone on the court, however, Serena Williams would no doubt stake a claim for her influence on women’s tennis. Not only did she revolutionise the game with powerful approach and heavy-hitting style – she has simply won more Grand Slams than any other women (in the open era).
Williams won 23 Grand Slams in her career including 13 on hard courts, 7 at the Australian Open (most of any women) and 6 US Open Open titles.
The undisputed King of Clay, Rafa Nadal, won the French Open title a mammoth 14 times. Not only is this a record in France, but indeed for any player (male or female) in any major tournament. Furthermore, he also holds the record for the most consecutive wins in the Open Era – dominating the clay from 2010 to 2014.
Not to be outdone on the court, however, Serena Williams would no doubt stake a claim for her influence on women’s tennis. Not only did she revolutionise the game with powerful approach and heavy-hitting style – she has simply won more Grand Slams than any other women (in the open era).
Williams won 23 Grand Slams in her career including 13 on hard courts, 7 at the Australian Open (most of any women) and 6 US Open Open titles.
The undisputed King of Clay, Rafa Nadal, won the French Open title a mammoth 14 times. Not only is this a record in France, but indeed for any player (male or female) in any major tournament. Furthermore, he also holds the record for the most consecutive wins in the Open Era – dominating the clay from 2010 to 2014.
Not to be outdone on the court, however, Serena Williams would no doubt stake a claim for her influence on women’s tennis. Not only did she revolutionise the game with powerful approach and heavy-hitting style – she has simply won more Grand Slams than any other women (in the open era).
Williams won 23 Grand Slams in her career including 13 on hard courts, 7 at the Australian Open (most of any women) and 6 US Open Open titles.
The undisputed King of Clay, Rafa Nadal, won the French Open title a mammoth 14 times. Not only is this a record in France, but indeed for any player (male or female) in any major tournament. Furthermore, he also holds the record for the most consecutive wins in the Open Era – dominating the clay from 2010 to 2014.
Not to be outdone on the court, however, Serena Williams would no doubt stake a claim for her influence on women’s tennis. Not only did she revolutionise the game with powerful approach and heavy-hitting style – she has simply won more Grand Slams than any other women (in the open era).
Williams won 23 Grand Slams in her career including 13 on hard courts, 7 at the Australian Open (most of any women) and 6 US Open Open titles.
The record for most Grand Slam titles is a testament to sustained excellence, with Novak Djokovic and Margaret Court at the pinnacle. As new stars emerge, the legacy of these tennis legends continue to sets the benchmark for greatness.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:03:38.863Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769817883_who-has-the-most-grand-slam-titles-in-tennis-history-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1033,"title":"Ultimate Guide to Hitting a Powerful Backhand in Tennis","slug":"ultimate-guide-to-hitting-a-powerful-backhand-in-tennis","excerpt":"Tennis’ little yellow ball can either be struck using a backhand or forehand strike. In this article, we focus on powerfully striking the ball using t","content_html":"Tennis’ little yellow ball can either be struck using a backhand or forehand strike. In this article, we focus on powerfully striking the ball using the backhand.
A backhand is hit leading with the back of the hand around your body, facing forward. Sounds like gymnastics, doesn’t it? We can imagine you trying to make sense of it right now.
But it isn’t that complicated. Just pick any object and pretend as if it were a tennis racquet and strike it with your hand facing forward. See, it’s something you’ve probably done before. In this ultimate guide, we will simplify it further.
A backhand stroke, as is commonly referred to in tennis, is one of the techniques employed in a tennis match by players to outwit their opponents.
Like we already mentioned above, the tennis ball is struck with the back of your hand facing forward across the body.
A right-handed player’s backhand starts with the racquet on the left-side of the body, proceeding across it until contact is made with the ball, and ends on the right-side of the body. The inverse is true for the left-hand.
It is generally assumed that the backhand is more difficult to master because the player’s dominant hand pulls into the shot, therefore, lacking the power of the forehand.
A double-handed backhand was the preferred option in the 20th century because of its stability and power.
However, the one-handed backhand’s popularity has resurged in recent years having been utilised greatly, earlier on in tennis’ history. We explore both and see which works best.
Historically, the one-handed backhand has been the preferred option for tennis players across all levels of the game.
The one-handed backhand gives players greater reach and variation of shot styles. It is much easier to topspin a shot or slice it, using the backhand.
One-handed backhands also permit more power in hitting the ball as compared to a double-handed backhand.
It’s therefore no surprise that the one-handed stroke is resurged in popularity, having been slightly over-shadowed by its counterpart at the arrival of the Open Era.
The one-handed backhand was the primary choice of tennis players at all levels in its first 100 years.
The one-handed backhand was the primary choice of tennis players at all levels in its first 100 years.
The one-handed backhand was the primary choice of tennis players at all levels in its first 100 years.
The one-handed backhand was the primary choice of tennis players at all levels in its first 100 years.
The one-handed backhand was the primary choice of tennis players at all levels in its first 100 years.
At one point, the 1970’s in particular, tennis’ most popular players employed the double-handed backhand.
One of the reasons for its popularity can be attributed to its accuracy, because of a better grip from using two hands.
The double-handed backhand provides more stability as compared to the one-hand backhand technique.
Double-handed backhand strokes also have more variations in terms of the stance a player uses when striking the ball. A very important factor at pro-level tennis.
For the purposes of this guide, we believe the use of a one-handed stroke to be more powerful and effective.
We explore the different techniques of this option and give you our recommendations towards the end.
There are three techniques of using the one-handed backhand, all very effective. A player can use either one or a combination of all three in a tennis match. It all depends on mastering them.
The slice was popularised by many classic players, some of which are Ken Rosewall and Steffi Graff. It is more simple and easier to learn, although mastering it can be somewhat difficult.
Slicing the ball closer to the bottom results in a higher and slower ball, resembling a lob, while slicing it closer to the side of the ball results in a faster and lower ball.
Either of those slice variations require some mastering but work very well when perfected.
A top spin’s backhand advantages include its ability to cope well with high balls, placement and consistency. It is performed well with the Semi-Western or Western Grip and is probably the hardest to learn.
It is executed by swinging the ball across the body, lower than the ball, hitting it toward the bottom or middle, swinging upwards.
This technique has been employed by players such as Richard Gasquet, Nicolas Almagro and Grigor Dimitrov.
Popularised by the likes of Rod Laver, Lew Hoad and Roy Emerson, the flat style one-handed backhand is advantageous because of its speed, angles and depth.
It is executed with an Eastern or Semi-Western Grip with the racquet pulled across the player’s body.
Don Budge has long been known for having the best backhand of all time, having had a powerful one-handed stroke in the 1930s and 40s that integrated the topspin into its arsenal. Budge used an Eastern Grip.
Ken Rosewall is another tennis player known to being great at the backhand, using the one-handed technique with a deadly slice and a continental grip. Let’s explore other players.
| One-handed Backhand | Double-handed Backhand | ||
| 1 | Stefanos Tsitsipas | 1 | Jimmy Connors |
| 2 | Richard Gasquet | 2 | Bjorn Borg |
| 3 | Roger Federer | 3 | Andre Agassi |
| 4 | Steffi Graff | 4 | Monica Seles |
| 5 | Martina Navratilova | 5 | Serena Williams |
| 6 | Suzanne Lenglen | 6 | Venus Williams |
| 7 | Lew Hoad | 7 | Maria Sharapova |
| 8 | Ken Rosewall | 8 | Mike Belkin |
| 9 | Roy Emerson | 9 | John Bromwich |
| 10 | Amelie Mauresmo | 10 | Chris Evert |
| One-handed Backhand | Double-handed Backhand | ||
| 1 | Stefanos Tsitsipas | 1 | Jimmy Connors |
| 2 | Richard Gasquet | 2 | Bjorn Borg |
| 3 | Roger Federer | 3 | Andre Agassi |
| 4 | Steffi Graff | 4 | Monica Seles |
| 5 | Martina Navratilova | 5 | Serena Williams |
| 6 | Suzanne Lenglen | 6 | Venus Williams |
| 7 | Lew Hoad | 7 | Maria Sharapova |
| 8 | Ken Rosewall | 8 | Mike Belkin |
| 9 | Roy Emerson | 9 | John Bromwich |
| 10 | Amelie Mauresmo | 10 | Chris Evert |
| One-handed Backhand | Double-handed Backhand | ||
| 1 | Stefanos Tsitsipas | 1 | Jimmy Connors |
| 2 | Richard Gasquet | 2 | Bjorn Borg |
| 3 | Roger Federer | 3 | Andre Agassi |
| 4 | Steffi Graff | 4 | Monica Seles |
| 5 | Martina Navratilova | 5 | Serena Williams |
| 6 | Suzanne Lenglen | 6 | Venus Williams |
| 7 | Lew Hoad | 7 | Maria Sharapova |
| 8 | Ken Rosewall | 8 | Mike Belkin |
| 9 | Roy Emerson | 9 | John Bromwich |
| 10 | Amelie Mauresmo | 10 | Chris Evert |
Three characteristics standout in executing the powerful backhand in our assessment.
The type of backhand, technique and grip. The three go hand in hand and when mastered, one might possibly stand toe to toe with the Ken Rosewall’s of this world.
The one-handed backhand stroke as compared to the double-handed backhand allows for more speed and agility. We believe speed to be key in a game of tennis and using one hand allows that.
Although two hands are said to be more precise and accurate, catching your opponent out with the precision of speed is second to none.
The slice technique is the oldest and easiest to use of the three techniques. A very great incentive for us because keeping it simple sometimes works wonders.
To wrap it up, we choose either a Continental or Eastern grip because both have commonly been used for the backhand, and the greats of the game have achieved wonders using either of the two.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:03:24.999Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769804038_ultimate-guide-to-hitting-a-powerful-backhand-in-tennis_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1032,"title":"What is an Ace in Tennis? Meaning & Key Facts","slug":"what-is-an-ace-in-tennis-meaning-key-facts","excerpt":"What is an ace? Simply put, it is a serve that is excellently executed that the opponent does not touch the ball with their racket, resulting in a poi","content_html":"What is an ace? Simply put, it is a serve that is excellently executed that the opponent does not touch the ball with their racket, resulting in a point for the serving player. Within the exhilarating world of tennis, the art of the serve is often the key to victory. One stands head and shoulders above the rest though – the ace!
Achieving an ace requires not only power and precision, but also strategic placement. It is the ultimate demonstration of skill and mentality on the tennis court. Although they are mainly seen amongst professional players, players at all levels of tennis look to hone their serving technique and increase their chance of landing an ace.
So what makes for a perfect ace?
The speed of the serve, the angle (in relation to the service box) of the ball on the serve, and often the added spin on the ball all come together to limit the chances of an opponent returning the serve, thus leading to an ace.
For statistical purposes, there is often a major correlation to the number of aces served in a match and the outcome of the match. Players such as John Isner and Milos Raonic are well known for their powerful serves, resulting in high ace counts, which pose incredible challenges to their opponents.
The term ‘ace’ itself refers to a serve that is not touched by the receiver, resulting in the server winning the point outright. Interestingly, at tennis’ inception the ace simply began the point – which was characterised by long rallies, strategic plays and athletic excellence. However, as the sport evolved different skills became more prominent.
At the turn of the 20th century, players and coaches began to appreciate the value in an unreturnable serve. The reality was that it took the upgrade in rackets and court surfaces to usher in the idea that a serve could be a weapon – welcome to the world of the ace!
Tennis was originally played with bare hands where players used their palms for rackets! Rackets were only introduced in the 16th century.
Tennis was originally played with bare hands where players used their palms for rackets! Rackets were only introduced in the 16th century.
Tennis was originally played with bare hands where players used their palms for rackets! Rackets were only introduced in the 16th century.
Tennis was originally played with bare hands where players used their palms for rackets! Rackets were only introduced in the 16th century.
Tennis was originally played with bare hands where players used their palms for rackets! Rackets were only introduced in the 16th century.
A players who needs absolutely no introduction, Roger Federer is arguably the greatest tennis player of all time…oh and he also had a masterful serve. Federer is the tennis player with the third-most aces in the history of the open era. The Swiss Maestro landed a little over 11 000 serves in his illustrious career.
The Croatian, best known for his serving prowess, won 92% of the games that he started by serving! It’s an incredible record. His serve was one of the beauties of the game for sure, landing over 13 000 aces in his 21-year professional career.
Sampras was another absolute legend of the game, leaving him off of this list would just be simply ridiculous. The American was nicknamed “Pistol Pete” after his powerful and aggressive approach to games.
Interestingly, he would spearhead the approach of applying topspin to his serve and then rush the net and look to volley his opponents returns to end the point quickly.
The man with the greatest number of aces in tennis history! Isner landed well over 14 000 aces during his career. Unfortunately, the American never managed to land a Grand Slam – his best result being a semi-final at Wimbledon – but he does have the honour of holding the record for the fastest serve of all time.
At a Davis Cup match in 2016, Isner produced a serve which notched up 253km/h on the speedometer. 253km/h!
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:03:15.504Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769794736_what-is-an-ace-in-tennis-meaning-key-facts_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1031,"title":"How Many Sets in Wimbledon? Men's & Women's Match Format","slug":"how-many-sets-in-wimbledon-men-s-women-s-match-format","excerpt":"Throughout the year, both the men and women (through the ATP and WTA tour respectively) play best of three sets per match. The association of Tennis P","content_html":"Throughout the year, both the men and women (through the ATP and WTA tour respectively) play best of three sets per match. The association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) governs most of the men’s tennis tournaments whilst the Women’s Tennis Association organises tournaments for the ladies.
Grand Slams are seen as the crème de la crème of tennis. They have the best players and hold the most ranking points for players – but importantly they are governed by neither the ATP or WTA, but rather the International Tennis Federation in conjunction with the Grand Slam Board.
At Wimbledon – a Grand Slam – the format for the men’s game changes to best of five sets. That means first to three wins. The women’s game remains at best of three sets.
These epic matches can often last hours, and often put on display unbridled athletic sporting ability!
54 250 Tennis balls are used during the Wimbledon Championships!
54 250 Tennis balls are used during the Wimbledon Championships!
54 250 Tennis balls are used during the Wimbledon Championships!
54 250 Tennis balls are used during the Wimbledon Championships!
54 250 Tennis balls are used during the Wimbledon Championships!
So what do you have to do to win Wimbledon? Male tennis players will need to win three sets to win a match. Female tennis players will need to win two sets to win a match. There is now a tiebreaker in the final set, and this applies across the board. In a nutshell, Wimbledon is arguably the most prestigious tournament, played over two weeks and the overall men’s winner would have had to win 21 sets of tennis, the ladies winner 14, to claim the ultimate prize in tennis.
What is a set? What has it got to do with games, and how does it determine whether a player wins the match?
To win a game, a player need only win four points. The points can often confuse novice fans because they are scored 0, 15, 30 and 40. If both players are tied on 40-40, this is called ‘deuce’. At this point in the game, the player who wins the next point goes to advantage and if they win the subsequent point, they win that game. Naturally, if they lose that point, the game returns to deuce until a player wins two points consecutively.
Players who win six games win the set. However, if the games are tied at 6-6, a tiebreaker then commences.
Essentially a tiebreaker is a one-off game held to decide the winner of a set when two players are locked at 6-6. The tiebreaker is a first to seven points shoutout, that is to say that the player who reaches seven points first wins. However, Wimbledon had a different rule for the tiebreaker.
Historically, the fifth set at Wimbledon was not decided by a tiebreaker, the match was decided by a player reaching a 2-game margin. This resulted in some incredibly lengthy tennis matches, hence many of the longest matches in history are often found at Wimbledon.
On the 16th of March 2022, the International Tennis Federation made a joint announcement in the interest of consistency. The Grand Slam Board agreed a decision to see all tiebreakers at Grand Slams (including Wimbledon) will have a 10-point tiebreaker to decide the final set where players have reached six games each.
So, not only do we now have a guaranteed tiebreaker for matches at Wimbledon, the tiebreaker itself at all Grand Slams has changed from first to seven points, to first to ten points with the necessary advantage.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:03:02.594Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769782205_how-many-sets-in-wimbledon-men-s-women-s-match-format_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1030,"title":"What is a Break Point in Tennis? Meaning & Types Explained","slug":"what-is-a-break-point-in-tennis-meaning-types-explained","excerpt":"A break point is an opportunity for a player receiving a serve to win the service game – essentially ‘breaking’ the opponents serve. The player receiv","content_html":"A break point is an opportunity for a player receiving a serve to win the service game – essentially ‘breaking’ the opponents serve. The player receiving the serve (the returner) must have won at least three points during the service game and now their next point is a break point.
Tennis is a sport which often comes down to the finest of margins. Players and coaches will oftens say that winning crucial points is often more influential insofar as where a match will go, as opposed to simply racking up points.
Break points are hugely influential to a match’s outcome, and will likely always have a role to play in its momentum swings.
At a basic level of understanding the nuances of tennis, winning your own service game is far more straightforward than having to win an opponent’s service game. Simply put, a server is in as much control as is possible during their service game. The returner is then asked to react to whatever the server is doing as best as possible.
However, to summarise their importance;
The longest rally in professional tennis lasted for 29 minutes and 43 seconds. It contained 643 shots and was contested between Vicky Nelson and Jean Hepner in the 1984 French Open!
The longest rally in professional tennis lasted for 29 minutes and 43 seconds. It contained 643 shots and was contested between Vicky Nelson and Jean Hepner in the 1984 French Open!
The longest rally in professional tennis lasted for 29 minutes and 43 seconds. It contained 643 shots and was contested between Vicky Nelson and Jean Hepner in the 1984 French Open!
The longest rally in professional tennis lasted for 29 minutes and 43 seconds. It contained 643 shots and was contested between Vicky Nelson and Jean Hepner in the 1984 French Open!
The longest rally in professional tennis lasted for 29 minutes and 43 seconds. It contained 643 shots and was contested between Vicky Nelson and Jean Hepner in the 1984 French Open!
As we have said, a break point occurs when the returner has an opportunity to win the game by securing the next point against the server. This shift, and its inherent impact, is often best seen in close competitive matches. The difference is often a handful of break points.
A single break point occurs when the returner is leading the game 30-40 or has an advantage from deuce. It is at this juncture that the returner needs just one more point to break their opponents serve.
It is an incredibly high pressure moment for the server in particular, knowing losing one point means losing the game.
This sort of situation would only become apparent when the score is 15-40, giving the returner two consecutive opportunities to break their opponents serve. The psychological pressure on the server is heightened even further here, knowing that the margin for error is even further reduced.
It also presents a sort of catch 22 situation. The serving player will have to decide on their approach to ensure they hold on to their service game. If they were to attempt riskier shots or strategies, they might become more aggressive and regain a foothold in their encounter or they lose the game through a lack of simple control.
And finally, the triple break point. Often seen as the most critical juncture in the game, the serving player finds themselves at 0-40 down, offering the returner three opportunities to break the serve.
It really is a daunting task for the server. It would seem as though everything is stacked against them. For the returner, the tactical advantage shouldn’t be underestimated, but moreover, the psychological edge would naturally result in incredible confidence.
Whether you are a seasoned tennis fan or not, understanding these points underpins the strategic depth of the sport. It allows you to appreciate the often tense situation out on court, and ensures that you are part of the possibly turning tide of the match.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:02:50.793Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769770148_what-is-a-break-point-in-tennis-meaning-types-explained_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1029,"title":"Doubles Tennis Rules: Serving, Scoring, & Key Guidelines","slug":"doubles-tennis-rules-serving-scoring-key-guidelines","excerpt":"As the name suggests, doubles tennis is effectively the team derivative of the individual game. Each tennis player has a partner while facing off agai","content_html":"As the name suggests, doubles tennis is effectively the team derivative of the individual game. Each tennis player has a partner while facing off against a pair of opponents. There are of course other factors which distinguish doubles tennis from singles, and we’ll unpack everything you need to know here!
The size of the court is a major difference between the single and doubles game. On a standard court, you would notice that there are two lines which run the length of the court on either side. They are referred to as the ‘doubles alleys’.
The space is a little over 1.3 meters wide, and in a doubles matchup considered in-bounds. Given that these ‘alleys’ are on the court during a singles match, but considered out of bounds, the doubles playing area is increased by just under 3 meters in width.
Nevertheless, the area a player would naturally cover in a doubles match would be smaller than a singles match. In doubles, you have four players on the court, and so the intensity and tax on an athletes legs is somewhat lower.
The spelling racket is the typical way to spell the piece of equipment used in net games like tennis. The alternative spelling is racquet. Racquet is more commonly used in sports such as squash and racquetball.
The spelling racket is the typical way to spell the piece of equipment used in net games like tennis. The alternative spelling is racquet. Racquet is more commonly used in sports such as squash and racquetball.
The spelling racket is the typical way to spell the piece of equipment used in net games like tennis. The alternative spelling is racquet. Racquet is more commonly used in sports such as squash and racquetball.
The spelling racket is the typical way to spell the piece of equipment used in net games like tennis. The alternative spelling is racquet. Racquet is more commonly used in sports such as squash and racquetball.
The spelling racket is the typical way to spell the piece of equipment used in net games like tennis. The alternative spelling is racquet. Racquet is more commonly used in sports such as squash and racquetball.
Just like in singles tennis, one player serves for an entire game of doubles tennis. They stand behind the baseline and serve the ball into the opposite service box. Upon completion of a successful serve, the point is played according to the usual rules of tennis.
Interestingly, whilst the partners must alternate their serves during the course of a game, they are allowed to switch the order for the next set. That is to say that if on a team of players A and B, if A serves first during the first set, they don’t necessarily have to start the second set.
During the serve, a player’s partner can stand anywhere they want on their teams side of the court. Normally, the partner will stand in their own service box parallel to the side their partner is serving from.
While the serving player switches sides on every point, the returning team has to stay on the same side of the court for the duration of a game. Therefore, whilst the server doesn’t change during a game, the opponents essentially alternate turns to receive the serve.
In both singles and doubles tennis, teams switch sides of the net after every odd-numbered game of a set. This changeover occurs with a short break of 90 seconds.
The scoring in doubles tennis is exactly the same as in the singles format. Points are captured as 15, 30 and 40. You need to win six games to win a set and usually you need two sets to win a match.
As you may know, tennis matches are played until a player has six games (with the required advantage), but where the set is tied at 6-6 a tiebreaker is triggered. There is no difference in doubles tennis.
A tiebreaker game is first to seven points. The serving format is also slightly different, whereby instead of one player serving for the entire game, during the tiebreaker a player serves first and thereafter they change every two points.
The changeover takes place every six games.
Often novice tennis fans are confused by doubles and mixed doubles. Doubles tennis simply refers to a team of players who are the either both male or female. This rule is applied consistently to every team who play in a doubles match or tournament.
Mixed doubles are then where one player is male and the other is female on a team. The rules are exactly the same as doubles. The court dimensions are also consistent with doubles.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:02:39.810Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769759124_doubles-tennis-rules-serving-scoring-key-guidelines_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1028,"title":"Tennis Match Suspension: What Does It Mean?","slug":"tennis-match-suspension-what-does-it-mean-","excerpt":"A tennis match’s suspension is the temporary halting of the match in the interests of all stakeholders. That is, players, fans and sundry. The Interna","content_html":"A tennis match’s suspension is the temporary halting of the match in the interests of all stakeholders. That is, players, fans and sundry.
The International Tennis Federation’s rule book’s provisions on a tennis match’s suspension indicate that the chair umpire or ITF referee may stop or suspend a match temporarily, owing to several conditions.
Frustrating as it may be for players in their rhythm, and fans captivated by the match, certain conditions dictate suspension. We investigate the reasons this may occur.
Wish it away as we may, weather is just one element all sporting codes must contend with.
Adverse weather conditions, darkness and the conditions of the grounds are the primary reasons a tennis match may be suspended.
As soon as the chair umpire undertakes the decision to suspend a tennis match, it must be reported to the ITF Supervisor who will assess the conditions and make a final decision. A decision to resume or postpone the match.
Until a final decision is made, the players, chair umpire and all on-court officials must remain ready to resume play.
Upon suspension of the match, the chair umpire has several things to make record of, as well as collecting all the balls in use for the match.
According to the National Institutes of Health, warm-up exercises are primed to help athletes adopt to the intensity demanded by competing, performance and the reduction of possible injuries.
But what about re-warm-ups because of breaks in sports, such as suspension of a tennis match?
They are just as important to maintain a certain level of performance and reduce injury risks, as are warm-ups.
With this in mind, the ITF has provisions on re-warm-ups for a suspended tennis match, to allow players to get back to their prior performance levels. They are as follows:
| Amount of Time in Delay | Re-warm-up Conditions |
| 0-15 minutes delay | No re-warm-up |
| 15-30 minutes delay | Three minute re-warm-up |
| 30+ minutes delay | Four or five minutes re-warm-up |
In September 2023, the US Open was forced to suspend matches due to extreme heat, after Novak Djokovic’s coach left sick.
In September 2023, the US Open was forced to suspend matches due to extreme heat, after Novak Djokovic’s coach left sick.
In September 2023, the US Open was forced to suspend matches due to extreme heat, after Novak Djokovic’s coach left sick.
In September 2023, the US Open was forced to suspend matches due to extreme heat, after Novak Djokovic’s coach left sick.
In September 2023, the US Open was forced to suspend matches due to extreme heat, after Novak Djokovic’s coach left sick.
As already noted above, the ITF’s rulebook provides that there are three primary reasons a tennis match maybe be suspended for. We investigate each, as well as some of the rules pertaining.
As soon as it starts raining, the ground staff must undertake several duties. Primarily, these are undertaken to ensure that when a decision to resume is taken, the conditions still allow for a tennis match to proceed properly.
The net, which is already there as a precautionary measure, must be pulled down to cover the entire playing area, to protect it from deterioration.
If the rain stops and there’s still sufficient natural light, the match is more likely to resume.
At a professional level and with the financial investment pumped into tennis, ground conditions alone, as a cause for suspension, is something that should not be happening.
In our assessment, it must be from the residual effects of weather conditions like rain, that ground conditions are cited as cause for suspension. However, stranger things have happened.
The US Open was recently brought to a halt for a very bizarre reason. The fire alarm at the event was triggered by the Hawkeye system.
Around five matches were suspended for just under ten minutes, leaving stars like Daniil Medvedev stranded.
Darkness seems pretty much like a random condition for suspension, or one that is farfetched. However, it is worth noting and can occur owing to several reasons.
A change of weather, cloud cover, sunset and failing floodlights are one of those reasons we believe might lead to darkness and subsequent suspension of a tennis match.
The ITF’s rules for play suspended because of darkness basically incapsulate the aforementioned. There are certain steps the chair umpire and other officials must follow.
When darkness becomes a factor, play should be suspended at the end of a set, or after an even number of games have been played in the set in progress.
Let’s have a quick look at a few matches that have been affected by suspension and the prevailing conditions. Most of the matches we cited here are very recent.
Darkness dimmed the suspense to a dramatic conclusion in the evening encounter between Elina Svitolina and Caroline Wozniacki.
Svitolina was leading 3-6, 7-6 (4), 2-1, when it was announced that the match would be concluded the following day.
Another prevailing cause for the suspension of this match was slippery conditions, attributable to rain.
Naomi Osaka and Katie Volynets also had to wait until the following day in their battle for a spot in the China Open Round of 16.
Rain was the primary reason for suspension, and not only did it cause the suspension of this match, but of all outer court matches.
No.10 seed at the time, Anna Kalinskaya was mounting a strong comeback against No.46, Peyton Stearns, when their match was also suspended.
Both players had a one-set advantage over their opponents when rain intervened, and suspension of the match was decided.
Holger Rune was leading India’s Sumit Nagal 6-3, 2-1 40A/d, while Grigor Dimitrov was up 6-4, 2-1 against Miomir Kecmanovic.
Both matches had to be suspended until the following day.
Perhaps this instance of match suspension is one of the extreme cases because of the number of matches that were affected and had to wait until the following day.
Andy Murray and Tomas Martin Etcheverry were tied at 3-3 in the second-round clash at the US Open when poor weather on the night was cited as cause for suspension.
One of the key matches amongst the 14 men’s singles that were suspended include Jannik Sinner’s tie against Andrea Vavassori.
The preceding day’s matches also experienced significant delays of around six hours because of rain, which was forecasted to continue all the way into the weekend of that Open.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:02:27.227Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769746814_tennis-match-suspension-what-does-it-mean-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1027,"title":"The 10 Best Female Tennis Players in History","slug":"the-10-best-female-tennis-players-in-history","excerpt":"Serena Williams Serena Williams encompasses greatness in the world of female tennis and the sport generally. She is one of the few female tennis playe","content_html":"Serena Williams encompasses greatness in the world of female tennis and the sport generally. She is one of the few female tennis players whose legacy and influence, as well as achievements put her right at the top our list.
She had a very successful career that demonstrated dominance in all senses with 23 career Grand Slam titles and the most match wins at 365. She has ventured into business since retirement and is making strides over there as well.
One tennis player who could feature at number one in most top 10 rankings, Steffi Graf’s career is storied and in some aspects had Box-office like incidents. Graf is one of three female tennis players to have won a Grand Slam of tennis.
Part of her other accolades include a Golden Slam, which is a Grand Slam of tennis with an Olympic Gold medal in a calendar year, plus 107 career titles to her name.
Third on our list is Martina Navratilova, who had a successful career in both singles and doubles and was very much dominant in the latter. To her name, she has 167 career titles and 18 Grand Slams.
Her career titles are almost double the amount Serena Williams has, and that would have qualified her for number one in most lists. However, Serena trumps her overall in terms of legacy and influence in the sport.
No other female on our list has more singles majors than Margaret Court with 24 Grand Slam titles to her name. Perhaps an argument could be made to have her a little higher up the list.
Venus Williams would have probably had more titles to her name were it not for her younger sister who beat her in most finals. Despite that, she had a solid career with many successes to her name.
Still yet to announce her retirement from sport, Venus has 7 Grand Slam titles and 5 Wimbledon wins to her name. And like her younger sister, she is currently very active in the business world right now.
The lesser known name on our list, Justine Henin has multiple titles to her name and brought light to Belgian tennis during her active playing days. It’s is because of her legacy and influence that she makes it on our list.
Chris Evert’s 18 Grand Slam victories and 157 finals appearances speak to her storied career in the women’s division. She is one of the few players to be ranked world no.1 for a long time, having done so for 157 weeks.
Post-retirement, Evert has been involved in the development of tennis players, running an academy called the Evert Tennis Academy which is based in Florida.
Coming in at number eight, Maria Sharapova is one of the best Russian tennis players ever, male or female, and retired officially in 2020. Sharapova also has a career Grand Slam to her name like some of the names we featured on our list.
Among her other accolades is five Grand Slam titles with an overall 36 career titles in singles compared to 3 in doubles. All achieved utilizing the two-handed backhand technic against her fiercest opponents.
Monica Seles was at one point Steffi Graf’s fiercest rival at the height of their careers, much to the escalation of an unfortunate incident that had a tremendous impact on one of their careers.
At sixteen years old, she was crowned the youngest French Open champion and has nine major titles to her name. Her stabbing was fictionalized in 1993 by Seinfeld in one of their episodes.
The youngest player on our list and the only one still playing actively and the world no. 1, Iga Swiatek is showing signs of greatness very early on into her career and as far as her trajectory, it looks like she will be ranked higher in the future.
At only twenty-three years, she already has five Grand Slam titles and twenty-two career singles titles and is yet to win any titles in a doubles event.
![\"Steffi](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FSteffi_Graf_d53f687f99.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Steffi Graf//Getty Images
Steffi Graf//Getty Images
Steffi Graf//Getty Images
| Rank | Player | GiveMeSport Rank | ESPN Rank | Notable Achievements |
| 1 | Serena Williams | 1 | 1 | 23 Grand Slams, 73 career titles, 365 Grand Slam match wins. |
| 2 | Steffi Graf | 2 | NR | 22 Grand Slams, Calendar Golden Slam (1988), 107 career titles. |
| 3 | Martina Navratilova | 3 | NR | 18 Grand Slams, 167 career titles, dominant doubles career. |
| 4 | Margaret Court | 4 | NR | 24 Grand Slams, most singles majors in tennis history. |
| 5 | Venus Williams | 8 | 2 | 7 Grand Slams, 89 major appearances, 5 Wimbledon titles. |
| 6 | Justine Henin | 9 | 4 | 7 Grand Slams, Olympic Gold Medalist, 42 career titles. |
| 7 | Chris Evert | 5 | NR | 18 Grand Slams, 157 finals appearances, highest win percentage (89.97%). |
| 8 | Maria Sharapova | NR | 3 | 5 Grand Slams, 21 weeks at No. 1, 36 WTA titles. |
| 9 | Monica Seles | 6 | NR | 9 Grand Slams, youngest French Open champion (16 years old). |
| 10 | Iga Swiatek | NR | 5 | 5 Grand Slams, current world No. 1, 20 career titles. |
| Rank | Player | GiveMeSport Rank | ESPN Rank | Notable Achievements |
| 1 | Serena Williams | 1 | 1 | 23 Grand Slams, 73 career titles, 365 Grand Slam match wins. |
| 2 | Steffi Graf | 2 | NR | 22 Grand Slams, Calendar Golden Slam (1988), 107 career titles. |
| 3 | Martina Navratilova | 3 | NR | 18 Grand Slams, 167 career titles, dominant doubles career. |
| 4 | Margaret Court | 4 | NR | 24 Grand Slams, most singles majors in tennis history. |
| 5 | Venus Williams | 8 | 2 | 7 Grand Slams, 89 major appearances, 5 Wimbledon titles. |
| 6 | Justine Henin | 9 | 4 | 7 Grand Slams, Olympic Gold Medalist, 42 career titles. |
| 7 | Chris Evert | 5 | NR | 18 Grand Slams, 157 finals appearances, highest win percentage (89.97%). |
| 8 | Maria Sharapova | NR | 3 | 5 Grand Slams, 21 weeks at No. 1, 36 WTA titles. |
| 9 | Monica Seles | 6 | NR | 9 Grand Slams, youngest French Open champion (16 years old). |
| 10 | Iga Swiatek | NR | 5 | 5 Grand Slams, current world No. 1, 20 career titles. |
| Rank | Player | GiveMeSport Rank | ESPN Rank | Notable Achievements |
| 1 | Serena Williams | 1 | 1 | 23 Grand Slams, 73 career titles, 365 Grand Slam match wins. |
| 2 | Steffi Graf | 2 | NR | 22 Grand Slams, Calendar Golden Slam (1988), 107 career titles. |
| 3 | Martina Navratilova | 3 | NR | 18 Grand Slams, 167 career titles, dominant doubles career. |
| 4 | Margaret Court | 4 | NR | 24 Grand Slams, most singles majors in tennis history. |
| 5 | Venus Williams | 8 | 2 | 7 Grand Slams, 89 major appearances, 5 Wimbledon titles. |
| 6 | Justine Henin | 9 | 4 | 7 Grand Slams, Olympic Gold Medalist, 42 career titles. |
| 7 | Chris Evert | 5 | NR | 18 Grand Slams, 157 finals appearances, highest win percentage (89.97%). |
| 8 | Maria Sharapova | NR | 3 | 5 Grand Slams, 21 weeks at No. 1, 36 WTA titles. |
| 9 | Monica Seles | 6 | NR | 9 Grand Slams, youngest French Open champion (16 years old). |
| 10 | Iga Swiatek | NR | 5 | 5 Grand Slams, current world No. 1, 20 career titles. |
| Rank | Player | Grand Slam Titles (50%) | WTA Titles (20%) | Career Milestones (15%) | Legacy (15%) | MetaScale Score |
| 1 | Serena Williams | 50 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 95 |
| 2 | Steffi Graf | 47 | 18 | 15 | 13 | 93 |
| 3 | Martina Navratilova | 40 | 20 | 13 | 13 | 86 |
| 4 | Margaret Court | 48 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 81 |
| 5 | Venus Williams | 35 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 78 |
| 6 | Justine Henin | 35 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 74 |
| 7 | Chris Evert | 40 | 15 | 10 | 8 | 73 |
| 8 | Maria Sharapova | 25 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 60 |
| 9 | Monica Seles | 30 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 58 |
| 10 | Iga Swiatek | 25 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 55 |
| Rank | Player | Grand Slam Titles (50%) | WTA Titles (20%) | Career Milestones (15%) | Legacy (15%) | MetaScale Score |
| 1 | Serena Williams | 50 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 95 |
| 2 | Steffi Graf | 47 | 18 | 15 | 13 | 93 |
| 3 | Martina Navratilova | 40 | 20 | 13 | 13 | 86 |
| 4 | Margaret Court | 48 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 81 |
| 5 | Venus Williams | 35 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 78 |
| 6 | Justine Henin | 35 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 74 |
| 7 | Chris Evert | 40 | 15 | 10 | 8 | 73 |
| 8 | Maria Sharapova | 25 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 60 |
| 9 | Monica Seles | 30 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 58 |
| 10 | Iga Swiatek | 25 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 55 |
| Rank | Player | Grand Slam Titles (50%) | WTA Titles (20%) | Career Milestones (15%) | Legacy (15%) | MetaScale Score |
| 1 | Serena Williams | 50 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 95 |
| 2 | Steffi Graf | 47 | 18 | 15 | 13 | 93 |
| 3 | Martina Navratilova | 40 | 20 | 13 | 13 | 86 |
| 4 | Margaret Court | 48 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 81 |
| 5 | Venus Williams | 35 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 78 |
| 6 | Justine Henin | 35 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 74 |
| 7 | Chris Evert | 40 | 15 | 10 | 8 | 73 |
| 8 | Maria Sharapova | 25 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 60 |
| 9 | Monica Seles | 30 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 58 |
| 10 | Iga Swiatek | 25 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 55 |
Looking at the rankings, dynamics and complexities of each respective female and their careers, at SportsBoom we hold certain views.
For one, we hold firm to the idea that Monica Seles by all measure could have been the greatest female tennis player to ever grace the court where it not for her unfortunate incident.
Her rise and successive victories early on in her career give indication to that assertion. And as far as popular opinion goes in tennis; most experts, opinion leaders and the likes have espoused such.
But we cannot dwell on the misfortunes of others as fate may have had it. Flowers must be given to the all-time great Serena Williams.
Her name is omnipotent in the sport and her influence goes beyond any titles won. She epitomized incomparable athleticism in the female division and if you were to ask a lay person to name a tennis star, her name would come top, male or female.
Martina Navratilova is another name that deserves mention, like Venus Williams, whose own success was and still is overshadowed by her younger sister.
Looking into the future, Iga Swiatek’s trajectory at only twenty-three years gives indication of a great in the making. Coco Gauff, although not present on our list, is bound for similar greatness.
The history of women’s tennis is defined by all the names who are featured on our list and some who did not make it.
Serena Williams’ dominance in the Grand Slam with 365 match wins and Margaret Court’s 25 Grand Slam titles are career achievements worth noting.
While others may not have had similar accolades, they too in their own ways had an impact on the sport. Some culturally and others on a socio-political level.
Like the Original 9, a band of women who signed $1 contracts to play a women’s only professional tournament in 1970, ushered in a legacy of equality in the sport.
As the years go by and newer generations emerge, the history and achievements of the tennis stars mentioned in our piece will be used as necessary reminders that a path was laid out for some to run, when others but merely crawled.
Today, millions are made in the sport and beyond that, those with some traction, past and present, leverage their names for causes greater than them, further solidifying their icon status.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:02:16.252Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769735479_the-10-best-female-tennis-players-in-history_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1026,"title":"How Much Do Tennis Coaches Really Make ?","slug":"how-much-do-tennis-coaches-really-make-","excerpt":"There are different types of tennis coaches, and for the purpose of this piece will focus solely on those who work with professional tennis players. I","content_html":"There are different types of tennis coaches, and for the purpose of this piece will focus solely on those who work with professional tennis players.
It begs a question how much tennis coaches earn, considering the astronomical amounts their clients receive in prize money.
WTA and ATP players are said to pay their coaches anywhere between 5 and 15% of their prize money earnings.
One cannot obviously wakeup and decide to become a professional tennis coach. There are avenues, specific experience and training that must have been had to coach the world’s top tennis stars.
This is probably the easiest and most logical route to take up coaching after retirement as a professional tennis player. It is hard for an athlete to completely leave any sport when retirement comes knocking.
Most take up coaching, undergo training to supplement their knowledge and the experience they already have.
This is necessary of course because coaching supersedes its technical aspect, there is an interpersonal and psychological role very key to the success of both coach and Player.
Not one of the most formidable tennis players in his day, the late Peter Lundgren worked with some of the biggest names.
He worked with Roger Federer from 2000 to 2003, helping him reach greater heights. He also guided Marat Safin to the 2005 Australian Open.
Peter Lundgren helped Roger Federer win 10 ATP titles and his first Grand Slam at Wimbledon in 2003.
Peter Lundgren helped Roger Federer win 10 ATP titles and his first Grand Slam at Wimbledon in 2003.
Peter Lundgren helped Roger Federer win 10 ATP titles and his first Grand Slam at Wimbledon in 2003.
Peter Lundgren helped Roger Federer win 10 ATP titles and his first Grand Slam at Wimbledon in 2003.
Peter Lundgren helped Roger Federer win 10 ATP titles and his first Grand Slam at Wimbledon in 2003.
Tony Roche is a revered figure in tennis, often referenced as very influential to the playing styles of many tennis Players.
He has coached several number ones and Grand Slam winning champions like Roger Federer, Ivan Lendl and Lleyton Hewitt.
Brad Gilbert’s highest ATP ranking was No.4 and has mentored the likes of Andy Murray, Kei Nishikori and Andy Roddick.
Darren Cahill only won two titles in his playing days. He has an impressive resume though, having coached Andre Agassi, Andy Murray and his biggest succuss thus far, Lleyton Hewitt.
Another revered name, Paul Annacone, has mentored Pete Sampras, Roger Federer and Tim Henman. He only won three titles as a professional player.
Professional development is necessary for a tennis coach to mentor the best and reach heights unimaginable.
The ITF provides such development opportunities through their various coaching and educational programmes.
On a yearly basis, the ITF works with an average of 68 countries to help develop and deliver higher standards of tennis coaching.
Their courses are put together with the help of the ITF coaches commission and coaching departments of some of the world’s most successful tennis nations.
Professional tennis players are directly responsible for their coaches. That is, hiring, firing and any other expenses. Therefore, getting good results and winning competitions is a key determinant of how well they earn.
Not only that, who they coach is another factor to consider. Coaches who are under the employ of good, highly ranked and winning tennis players are, according to our assessment at the top of the high earner’s lists.
It’s the contrary for those under the employ of lowly ranked players. Let’s take Kiranpal Pannu, who ranked No. 664 at the end of the 2023 season, with prize monies of $6,771 and expenses to the cost of $34,500.
We can only imagine how much he was able to pay his coach, and we think not that much, especially on a negative balance if we were to do some accounting. Therefore, we can safely say some earn good while others don’t.
The figures are pretty sketchy and difficult to determine, however, based on contractual agreements between player and coach, the latter might receive a weekly or monthly payment, with other expenses paid on their behalf.
The amounts vary. We will therefore not focus on that aspect, but on the general percentage coaches get from their players’ prize monies, that is between 5 to 15%.
We believe that will help us easily hypothesise what coaches really earn. Let’s take the following scenarios into consideration.
We are going to use the current number one ranked male and female WTA and ATP players.
The figures are pretty sketchy and difficult to determine, however, based on contractual agreements between player and coach, the latter might receive a weekly or monthly payment, with other expenses paid on their behalf.
The amounts vary. We will therefore not focus on that aspect, but on the general percentage coaches get from their players’ prize monies, that is between 5 to 15%.
We believe that will help us easily hypothesise what coaches really earn. Let’s take the following scenarios into consideration.
We are going to use the current number one ranked male and female WTA and ATP players.
The figures are pretty sketchy and difficult to determine, however, based on contractual agreements between player and coach, the latter might receive a weekly or monthly payment, with other expenses paid on their behalf.
The amounts vary. We will therefore not focus on that aspect, but on the general percentage coaches get from their players’ prize monies, that is between 5 to 15%.
We believe that will help us easily hypothesise what coaches really earn. Let’s take the following scenarios into consideration.
We are going to use the current number one ranked male and female WTA and ATP players.
As we can see, both players have had great seasons and have made some decent or astronomical money, depending on your perspective. Let’s say both have agreements to pay their coaches weekly and 10% on annual prize money winnings.
Jannik Sinner would pay his coach, $1,203,293.5 million following the conclusion of the season, with Aryna Sabalenka paying her coach, $869,426, plus weekly wages and any other agreed upon bonuses.
Therefore, both coaches would most definitely have made good money in 2024. This might probably be the same for coaches of other players ranked in the top 10 or 100 of either the WTA or ATP.
We can’t say the same for lower ranked players who are scrapping their way up. A tennis coach would really have to be elite to earn good figures as there is no minimum wage. It is therefore difficult to determine what a said coach earns, or all coaches earn.
What we believe to be enlightening is the percentage break down they get from prize monies. That’s where the juice is, if we may say.
As we can see, both players have had great seasons and have made some decent or astronomical money, depending on your perspective. Let’s say both have agreements to pay their coaches weekly and 10% on annual prize money winnings.
Jannik Sinner would pay his coach, $1,203,293.5 million following the conclusion of the season, with Aryna Sabalenka paying her coach, $869,426, plus weekly wages and any other agreed upon bonuses.
Therefore, both coaches would most definitely have made good money in 2024. This might probably be the same for coaches of other players ranked in the top 10 or 100 of either the WTA or ATP.
We can’t say the same for lower ranked players who are scrapping their way up. A tennis coach would really have to be elite to earn good figures as there is no minimum wage. It is therefore difficult to determine what a said coach earns, or all coaches earn.
What we believe to be enlightening is the percentage break down they get from prize monies. That’s where the juice is, if we may say.
As we can see, both players have had great seasons and have made some decent or astronomical money, depending on your perspective. Let’s say both have agreements to pay their coaches weekly and 10% on annual prize money winnings.
Jannik Sinner would pay his coach, $1,203,293.5 million following the conclusion of the season, with Aryna Sabalenka paying her coach, $869,426, plus weekly wages and any other agreed upon bonuses.
Therefore, both coaches would most definitely have made good money in 2024. This might probably be the same for coaches of other players ranked in the top 10 or 100 of either the WTA or ATP.
We can’t say the same for lower ranked players who are scrapping their way up. A tennis coach would really have to be elite to earn good figures as there is no minimum wage. It is therefore difficult to determine what a said coach earns, or all coaches earn.
What we believe to be enlightening is the percentage break down they get from prize monies. That’s where the juice is, if we may say.
As we can see, both players have had great seasons and have made some decent or astronomical money, depending on your perspective. Let’s say both have agreements to pay their coaches weekly and 10% on annual prize money winnings.
Jannik Sinner would pay his coach, $1,203,293.5 million following the conclusion of the season, with Aryna Sabalenka paying her coach, $869,426, plus weekly wages and any other agreed upon bonuses.
Therefore, both coaches would most definitely have made good money in 2024. This might probably be the same for coaches of other players ranked in the top 10 or 100 of either the WTA or ATP.
We can’t say the same for lower ranked players who are scrapping their way up. A tennis coach would really have to be elite to earn good figures as there is no minimum wage. It is therefore difficult to determine what a said coach earns, or all coaches earn.
What we believe to be enlightening is the percentage break down they get from prize monies. That’s where the juice is, if we may say.
As we can see, both players have had great seasons and have made some decent or astronomical money, depending on your perspective. Let’s say both have agreements to pay their coaches weekly and 10% on annual prize money winnings.
Jannik Sinner would pay his coach, $1,203,293.5 million following the conclusion of the season, with Aryna Sabalenka paying her coach, $869,426, plus weekly wages and any other agreed upon bonuses.
Therefore, both coaches would most definitely have made good money in 2024. This might probably be the same for coaches of other players ranked in the top 10 or 100 of either the WTA or ATP.
We can’t say the same for lower ranked players who are scrapping their way up. A tennis coach would really have to be elite to earn good figures as there is no minimum wage. It is therefore difficult to determine what a said coach earns, or all coaches earn.
What we believe to be enlightening is the percentage break down they get from prize monies. That’s where the juice is, if we may say.
As we can see, both players have had great seasons and have made some decent or astronomical money, depending on your perspective. Let’s say both have agreements to pay their coaches weekly and 10% on annual prize money winnings.
Jannik Sinner would pay his coach, $1,203,293.5 million following the conclusion of the season, with Aryna Sabalenka paying her coach, $869,426, plus weekly wages and any other agreed upon bonuses.
Therefore, both coaches would most definitely have made good money in 2024. This might probably be the same for coaches of other players ranked in the top 10 or 100 of either the WTA or ATP.
We can’t say the same for lower ranked players who are scrapping their way up. A tennis coach would really have to be elite to earn good figures as there is no minimum wage. It is therefore difficult to determine what a said coach earns, or all coaches earn.
What we believe to be enlightening is the percentage break down they get from prize monies. That’s where the juice is, if we may say.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:02:03.005Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769722103_how-much-do-tennis-coaches-really-make-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1025,"title":"List Of 20 Highest Paid Female Tennis Player","slug":"list-of-20-highest-paid-female-tennis-player","excerpt":"The highest paid lists are an intrigue and alluring topic for people, probably because of the capitalist economy with live in. Like it’s often said, ‘","content_html":"The highest paid lists are an intrigue and alluring topic for people, probably because of the capitalist economy with live in. Like it’s often said, ‘It’s all about the Benjamins’.
Tennis stars are not exempt from such inquiries because we can bet our bottom dollar everyone wants to know how much they make from hitting that little green ball.
Our list is diverse as it features active and retired female tennis players. Ironically, the spilt is ten each, and no we didn’t plan it, it’s just one of those weird ironies.
We used data from prize monies won as we believe that is in all essence money tennis players earn from their trade. Endorsements and all else come as accrual from their greatness.
Our list is compiled using official figures from WTA’s career prize money data. The figures in of themselves are very recent.
Naomi Osaka just makes the cut at number twenty when most would have expected her to be higher up. We also have retired legendary names in the list, let’s have a look:
| Position | Player | Professional Status | Total Earnings |
| 1. | Serena Williams | Retired | $94,816,730 |
| 2. | Venus Williams | Active | $42,648,578 |
| 3. | Simona Halep | Active | $40,232,663 |
| 4. | Maria Sharapova | Retired | $38,777,962 |
| 5. | Victoria Azarenka | Active | $38,063,787 |
| 6. | Petra Kvitova | Active | $37,253,812 |
| 7. | Caroline Wozniacki | Active | $36,441,868 |
| 8. | Angelique Kerber | Retired | $32,519,180 |
| 9. | Iga Swiatek | Active | $32,106,991 |
| 10. | Aryna Sabalenka | Active | $29,071,823 |
| 11. | Agnieszka Radwanska | Retired | $27,683,807 |
| 12. | Karolina Pliskova | Active | $26,111,050 |
| 13. | Svetlana Kuznetsova | Retired | $25,816,890 |
| 14. | Garbiñe Muguruza | Retired | $24,813,892 |
| 15. | Martina Hingis | Retired | $24,749,074 |
| 16. | Kim Clijsters | Retired | $24,545,194 |
| 17. | Elina Svitolina | Active | $24,309,612 |
| 18. | Ashleigh Barty | Retired | $23,829,070 |
| 19. | Lindsay Davenport | Retired | $22,166,338 |
| 20. | Naomi Osaka | Active | $22,047,163 |
We used data from prize monies won as we believe that is in all essence money tennis players earn from their trade. Endorsements and all else come as accrual from their greatness.
Our list is compiled using official figures from WTA’s career prize money data. The figures in of themselves are very recent.
Naomi Osaka just makes the cut at number twenty when most would have expected her to be higher up. We also have retired legendary names in the list, let’s have a look:
| Position | Player | Professional Status | Total Earnings |
| 1. | Serena Williams | Retired | $94,816,730 |
| 2. | Venus Williams | Active | $42,648,578 |
| 3. | Simona Halep | Active | $40,232,663 |
| 4. | Maria Sharapova | Retired | $38,777,962 |
| 5. | Victoria Azarenka | Active | $38,063,787 |
| 6. | Petra Kvitova | Active | $37,253,812 |
| 7. | Caroline Wozniacki | Active | $36,441,868 |
| 8. | Angelique Kerber | Retired | $32,519,180 |
| 9. | Iga Swiatek | Active | $32,106,991 |
| 10. | Aryna Sabalenka | Active | $29,071,823 |
| 11. | Agnieszka Radwanska | Retired | $27,683,807 |
| 12. | Karolina Pliskova | Active | $26,111,050 |
| 13. | Svetlana Kuznetsova | Retired | $25,816,890 |
| 14. | Garbiñe Muguruza | Retired | $24,813,892 |
| 15. | Martina Hingis | Retired | $24,749,074 |
| 16. | Kim Clijsters | Retired | $24,545,194 |
| 17. | Elina Svitolina | Active | $24,309,612 |
| 18. | Ashleigh Barty | Retired | $23,829,070 |
| 19. | Lindsay Davenport | Retired | $22,166,338 |
| 20. | Naomi Osaka | Active | $22,047,163 |
We used data from prize monies won as we believe that is in all essence money tennis players earn from their trade. Endorsements and all else come as accrual from their greatness.
Our list is compiled using official figures from WTA’s career prize money data. The figures in of themselves are very recent.
Naomi Osaka just makes the cut at number twenty when most would have expected her to be higher up. We also have retired legendary names in the list, let’s have a look:
| Position | Player | Professional Status | Total Earnings |
| 1. | Serena Williams | Retired | $94,816,730 |
| 2. | Venus Williams | Active | $42,648,578 |
| 3. | Simona Halep | Active | $40,232,663 |
| 4. | Maria Sharapova | Retired | $38,777,962 |
| 5. | Victoria Azarenka | Active | $38,063,787 |
| 6. | Petra Kvitova | Active | $37,253,812 |
| 7. | Caroline Wozniacki | Active | $36,441,868 |
| 8. | Angelique Kerber | Retired | $32,519,180 |
| 9. | Iga Swiatek | Active | $32,106,991 |
| 10. | Aryna Sabalenka | Active | $29,071,823 |
| 11. | Agnieszka Radwanska | Retired | $27,683,807 |
| 12. | Karolina Pliskova | Active | $26,111,050 |
| 13. | Svetlana Kuznetsova | Retired | $25,816,890 |
| 14. | Garbiñe Muguruza | Retired | $24,813,892 |
| 15. | Martina Hingis | Retired | $24,749,074 |
| 16. | Kim Clijsters | Retired | $24,545,194 |
| 17. | Elina Svitolina | Active | $24,309,612 |
| 18. | Ashleigh Barty | Retired | $23,829,070 |
| 19. | Lindsay Davenport | Retired | $22,166,338 |
| 20. | Naomi Osaka | Active | $22,047,163 |
The concentration of money in tennis is extremely polarised, with 99% of it concentrated among the top 1%. That is players in the top 50 of either the WTA or ATP.
The concentration of money in tennis is extremely polarised, with 99% of it concentrated among the top 1%. That is players in the top 50 of either the WTA or ATP.
The concentration of money in tennis is extremely polarised, with 99% of it concentrated among the top 1%. That is players in the top 50 of either the WTA or ATP.
The concentration of money in tennis is extremely polarised, with 99% of it concentrated among the top 1%. That is players in the top 50 of either the WTA or ATP.
The concentration of money in tennis is extremely polarised, with 99% of it concentrated among the top 1%. That is players in the top 50 of either the WTA or ATP.
At number one, we have the best female tennis player to grace our presence in Serena Williams who is by miles ahead of number two. And just take a wild guess who that might be.
In another case of irony, we have the elder sister to Serena, Venus Williams at number two, albeit miles behind Serena whose figures are double that of her sister who is in retirement.
We can only wonder how many events Venus, who turned pro thirty years ago would need to win to reach her younger sister’s earnings. Perhaps if she hadn’t lost so many finals to her, we would be speaking something else.
![\"Iga](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FIga_Swiatek_of_Poland_86ed972fe8.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Iga Swiatek//Getty Images
At 44 years of age and no longer in her prime we doubt Venus Williams will catch up to her younger sister’s earnings. It’s impossible as far as we can see, and we will dare to say ‘never’.
Iga Swiatek is the one female tennis player we think can reasonably catch Serena. Age is on her side at 23 and her earnings are around 30% of Serena’s overall earnings.
If she maintains a consistent enough level in reaching finals and winning them, she might just equal or peep the legendary American tennis player.
Others in the top ten don’t have that much of a chance based on age. It’s only Naomi Osaka and Aryna Sabalenka who have a fighting chance, but very doubtful in our assessment.
Maria Sharapova is the second highest earning female tennis player on our list, closely trailed by Angelique Kerber. Sharapova is a former World No. 1 who retired in 2020 and is one of ten women to achieve a career Grand Slam.
A career Grand Slam is the achievement of winning all four major championships in one discipline. She along with Serena Willaims are the only retired females on our list to have achieved the feat.
Serena did it in singles and doubles, further showing her dominance over her counterparts in this piece.
Venus Williams is the highest earner on our list closely followed by Simona Halep. Age wise we do not think she has much to give to the game of tennis. Her last match was on March 19, 2024, in the Miami Open which she lost to Diana Shnaider.
Her latest ranking as per the WTA is 970, with earnings of $53,300. Perhaps this signals to us that her focus is now more on her business ventures, but until she officially retires, she steadily holds the spot among the active players.
As we have forecasted, Iga Swiatek is the player we believe to match or even peep the number one all time earning player, let alone the number two active player, who’s earnings eclipse that of Swiatek by just over 8 million.
Iga Swiatek//Getty Images
Iga Swiatek//Getty Images
There are a lot of female tennis players, young and on the come up who promise to dominate the highest paid lists of the future.
We will make mention of just a few, all 25 years of age or below:
| Name | Age | Total Earnings |
| Iga Swiatek | 23 | $32,106,991 |
| Coco Gauff | 20 | $21,581,989 |
| Elena Rybakina | 25 | $15,734,990 |
| Qinwen Zheng | 22 | $8,311,577 |
| Emma Navarro | 23 | $3,528,374 |
There are a lot of female tennis players, young and on the come up who promise to dominate the highest paid lists of the future.
We will make mention of just a few, all 25 years of age or below:
| Name | Age | Total Earnings |
| Iga Swiatek | 23 | $32,106,991 |
| Coco Gauff | 20 | $21,581,989 |
| Elena Rybakina | 25 | $15,734,990 |
| Qinwen Zheng | 22 | $8,311,577 |
| Emma Navarro | 23 | $3,528,374 |
There are a lot of female tennis players, young and on the come up who promise to dominate the highest paid lists of the future.
We will make mention of just a few, all 25 years of age or below:
| Name | Age | Total Earnings |
| Iga Swiatek | 23 | $32,106,991 |
| Coco Gauff | 20 | $21,581,989 |
| Elena Rybakina | 25 | $15,734,990 |
| Qinwen Zheng | 22 | $8,311,577 |
| Emma Navarro | 23 | $3,528,374 |
They only receive equal play at the Grand Slams but get paid significantly lesser throughout the year.
No, they don’t. Money is made by progressing in and winning the different tournaments.
Professional tennis players get paid according to performance. The are different allocations for each position reached.
Being in the top 100 is probably the best thing a tennis player can do for themselves because the top earners are concentrated right at the top.
Besides earnings from prize monies, players make significant amounts of money from sponsors.
They only receive equal play at the Grand Slams but get paid significantly lesser throughout the year.
They only receive equal play at the Grand Slams but get paid significantly lesser throughout the year.
They only receive equal play at the Grand Slams but get paid significantly lesser throughout the year.
Do tennis players have fixed pay?No, they don’t. Money is made by progressing in and winning the different tournaments.
No, they don’t. Money is made by progressing in and winning the different tournaments.
No, they don’t. Money is made by progressing in and winning the different tournaments.
How does prize money work in tennis?Professional tennis players get paid according to performance. The are different allocations for each position reached.
Professional tennis players get paid according to performance. The are different allocations for each position reached.
Professional tennis players get paid according to performance. The are different allocations for each position reached.
Do players ranked higher earn more?Being in the top 100 is probably the best thing a tennis player can do for themselves because the top earners are concentrated right at the top.
Being in the top 100 is probably the best thing a tennis player can do for themselves because the top earners are concentrated right at the top.
Being in the top 100 is probably the best thing a tennis player can do for themselves because the top earners are concentrated right at the top.
What are the other earning avenues in tennis?Besides earnings from prize monies, players make significant amounts of money from sponsors.
Besides earnings from prize monies, players make significant amounts of money from sponsors.
Besides earnings from prize monies, players make significant amounts of money from sponsors.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:01:50.453Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769709674_list-of-20-highest-paid-female-tennis-player_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1024,"title":"Best Backhands in Tennis History: Analyzing the Greatest","slug":"best-backhands-in-tennis-history-analyzing-the-greatest","excerpt":"Top 10 Best Backhands in Tennis Our top 10 best backhands in history has a mixture of the various generations, past and present to some extent. 90-yea","content_html":"Our top 10 best backhands in history has a mixture of the various generations, past and present to some extent.
90-year-old Ken Rosewall is the oldest to feature on our list with one of the best tennis players of any generation, Roger Federer also present.
Certain metrics were applied. Briefly, we considered power, accuracy and impact among some of our criteria.
At the top of our list is none other than Novak Djokovic, who is known for using a double-backhand technique, one said to be the best in history.
Djokovic won numerous accolades using the technique, with a precision that is unmatched till date, hence he makes it to number one.
Roger Federer employed the single-handed backhand, which was crucial to his overall success, and he did so when it was on the decline.
Unlike the double-hand backhand technique, which affords a tennis player more power in their shots, the single-hand backhand is more of a finesse approach, which Federer employed well with an educated topspin.
Another Swiss makes it on our list in Stan Warinka, who utilizes the one-handed backhand technique and is able to generate some power and spin in doing so.
Wawrinka’s one-handed backhand is supported by his stronger right-hand and has won three Grand Slam titles, all won in 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Gasquet makes it in most top five lists of the best back-handers and it comes as no surprise that he features as such in our list.
The Frenchman, despite not having a Grand Slam to his name, is known for having an elegant one-handed backhand with a topspin like no other.
The pride of Belgian tennis and famously bestowed, “The Little hand That Could”, by the late Bud Collins, Justine Henin is one of two females to make it on our list.
Henin is known to have employed a lot of power and precision despite those outcomes being quite difficult to achieve with a one-handed backhand technique.
The Brazilian three-time Roland Garros champion and former world no.1 during his playing days, Gustavo Kuerton, like most tennis players who made it on our list utilized the one-hand technique.
He was known to have an exceptional topspin, attacking the baseline with some aggression and had a solid serve as well.
The oldest to make it on our list at 90-years-old, Ken Rosewall is one of the forebears subsequent generations used as a reference for the backhand technique.
He employed the slice when using the technique and dominated the amateur ranks and the Open Era during his prime.
![\"Rosewall](\"/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.sportsboom.com%2FRosewall_V_Roche_10ae47cdf5.jpg&w=1920&q=75\")
Rosewall V Roche//Getty Images
Rosewall V Roche//Getty Images
Rosewall V Roche//Getty Images
David Nalbandian breaks the string of tennis players who used the one-handed technique in our list as he employed the double-handed technique like Novak Djokovic.
This afforded him crucial wins against Roger Federer and other top tennis players during his playing days.
Another double-handed backhand technique user, Kei Nishikori is very effective on the return and long rallies, and is one of the most successful Japanese tennis players in history.
The furthest he made it in Grand Slam events was the US Open in 2014, but has fourteen career titles to his name.
The second female on our list and number ten to round it off, Carla Suarez Navarro is known to have been one of the best players to use the one-hand technique before her retirement in 2021.
Her highest ranking in singles was world no.6 in 2016 and has five overall career titles. Two in doubles and three in singles.
| Rank | Player | FD Tennis Rank | Tennis.com Rank | Notable Achievements |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic | 1 | NR | Best double-handed backhand in history; unmatched consistency and precision; instrumental in his Grand Slam victories. |
| 2 | Roger Federer | NR | 1 | Most elegant single-handed backhand; crucial in his 20 Grand Slam titles; excels at cross-court angles and topspin |
| 3 | Stan Wawrinka | 3 | 3 | Known for power and spin; iconic backhand winners during his three Grand Slam victories, especially at Roland Garros |
| 4 | Richard Gasquet | 2 | 5 | Most graceful one-hander of his era; exceptional topspin and disguise |
| 5 | Justin Henin | NR | 2 | “The Little Backhand That Could”; unmatched among female players for power and versatility; dominated from the baseline with her one-hander |
| 6 | Gustavo Kuerten | NR | 6 | Three-time Roland Garros champion |
| 7 | Ken Rosewall | NR | 4 | Renowned for his backhand slice; dominated the amateur and early Open Era with his tactical approach |
| 8 | David Nalbandian | 4 | NR | Versatile double-handed backhand; key in his wins against Federer and other top players during his peak years |
| 9 | Kei Nishikori | 5 | NR | Compact and efficient two-hander; highly effective on the return and in long rallies |
| 10 | Carla Suarez Navarro | NR | 8 | Best one-hander among active female players; praised for her smooth stroke and ability to generate winners from deep court positions |
| Rank | Player | FD Tennis Rank | Tennis.com Rank | Notable Achievements |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic | 1 | NR | Best double-handed backhand in history; unmatched consistency and precision; instrumental in his Grand Slam victories. |
| 2 | Roger Federer | NR | 1 | Most elegant single-handed backhand; crucial in his 20 Grand Slam titles; excels at cross-court angles and topspin |
| 3 | Stan Wawrinka | 3 | 3 | Known for power and spin; iconic backhand winners during his three Grand Slam victories, especially at Roland Garros |
| 4 | Richard Gasquet | 2 | 5 | Most graceful one-hander of his era; exceptional topspin and disguise |
| 5 | Justin Henin | NR | 2 | “The Little Backhand That Could”; unmatched among female players for power and versatility; dominated from the baseline with her one-hander |
| 6 | Gustavo Kuerten | NR | 6 | Three-time Roland Garros champion |
| 7 | Ken Rosewall | NR | 4 | Renowned for his backhand slice; dominated the amateur and early Open Era with his tactical approach |
| 8 | David Nalbandian | 4 | NR | Versatile double-handed backhand; key in his wins against Federer and other top players during his peak years |
| 9 | Kei Nishikori | 5 | NR | Compact and efficient two-hander; highly effective on the return and in long rallies |
| 10 | Carla Suarez Navarro | NR | 8 | Best one-hander among active female players; praised for her smooth stroke and ability to generate winners from deep court positions |
| Rank | Player | FD Tennis Rank | Tennis.com Rank | Notable Achievements |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic | 1 | NR | Best double-handed backhand in history; unmatched consistency and precision; instrumental in his Grand Slam victories. |
| 2 | Roger Federer | NR | 1 | Most elegant single-handed backhand; crucial in his 20 Grand Slam titles; excels at cross-court angles and topspin |
| 3 | Stan Wawrinka | 3 | 3 | Known for power and spin; iconic backhand winners during his three Grand Slam victories, especially at Roland Garros |
| 4 | Richard Gasquet | 2 | 5 | Most graceful one-hander of his era; exceptional topspin and disguise |
| 5 | Justin Henin | NR | 2 | “The Little Backhand That Could”; unmatched among female players for power and versatility; dominated from the baseline with her one-hander |
| 6 | Gustavo Kuerten | NR | 6 | Three-time Roland Garros champion |
| 7 | Ken Rosewall | NR | 4 | Renowned for his backhand slice; dominated the amateur and early Open Era with his tactical approach |
| 8 | David Nalbandian | 4 | NR | Versatile double-handed backhand; key in his wins against Federer and other top players during his peak years |
| 9 | Kei Nishikori | 5 | NR | Compact and efficient two-hander; highly effective on the return and in long rallies |
| 10 | Carla Suarez Navarro | NR | 8 | Best one-hander among active female players; praised for her smooth stroke and ability to generate winners from deep court positions |
| Rank | Player | Consistency (30%) | Power (25%) | Versatility (20%) | Aesthetic Appeal (15%) | Impact (10%) | MetaScale Score |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic
| 30 | 22 | 19 | 10 | 10 | 91 |
| 2 | Roger Federer
| 27 | 20 | 18 | 15 | 9 | 89 |
| 3 | Stan Wawrinka | 26 | 24 | 15 | 12 | 8 | 86 |
| 4 | Richard Gasquet | 25 | 21 | 14 | 13 | 8 | 81 |
| 5 | Justin Henin | 28 | 19 | 14 | 14 | 7 | 82 |
| 6 | Gustavo Kuerten | 23 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 75 |
| 7 | Ken Rosewall | 22 | 17 | 14 | 12 | 7 | 72 |
| 8 | David Nalbandian | 24 | 19 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 73 |
| 9 | Kei Nishikori | 25 | 18 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 73 |
| 10 | Carla Suarez Navarro | 23 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 68 |
| Rank | Player | Consistency (30%) | Power (25%) | Versatility (20%) | Aesthetic Appeal (15%) | Impact (10%) | MetaScale Score |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic
| 30 | 22 | 19 | 10 | 10 | 91 |
| 2 | Roger Federer
| 27 | 20 | 18 | 15 | 9 | 89 |
| 3 | Stan Wawrinka | 26 | 24 | 15 | 12 | 8 | 86 |
| 4 | Richard Gasquet | 25 | 21 | 14 | 13 | 8 | 81 |
| 5 | Justin Henin | 28 | 19 | 14 | 14 | 7 | 82 |
| 6 | Gustavo Kuerten | 23 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 75 |
| 7 | Ken Rosewall | 22 | 17 | 14 | 12 | 7 | 72 |
| 8 | David Nalbandian | 24 | 19 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 73 |
| 9 | Kei Nishikori | 25 | 18 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 73 |
| 10 | Carla Suarez Navarro | 23 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 68 |
| Rank | Player | Consistency (30%) | Power (25%) | Versatility (20%) | Aesthetic Appeal (15%) | Impact (10%) | MetaScale Score |
| 1 | Novak Djokovic
| 30 | 22 | 19 | 10 | 10 | 91 |
| 2 | Roger Federer
| 27 | 20 | 18 | 15 | 9 | 89 |
| 3 | Stan Wawrinka | 26 | 24 | 15 | 12 | 8 | 86 |
| 4 | Richard Gasquet | 25 | 21 | 14 | 13 | 8 | 81 |
| 5 | Justin Henin | 28 | 19 | 14 | 14 | 7 | 82 |
| 6 | Gustavo Kuerten | 23 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 75 |
| 7 | Ken Rosewall | 22 | 17 | 14 | 12 | 7 | 72 |
| 8 | David Nalbandian | 24 | 19 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 73 |
| 9 | Kei Nishikori | 25 | 18 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 73 |
| 10 | Carla Suarez Navarro | 23 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 68 |
At SportsBoom.com we recognize that the backhand technique is not one of the easiest to pull off, and as far the times dictate, more and more modern players are moving away from it, and those that still do, are a few in a dying art.
Roger Federer would make it to number one in most lists, but just misses out to one of his greatest rivals, Novak Djokovic, who in our opinion has pulled off the technique like no other player.
Of course, more females could be represented, but the two who did, simply standout, especially Justine Henin, who was immortalized by the late Bud Collins.
Tennis remains one of the most sophisticated sports in the world, and utilizing any technique and being successful whilst at it is worthy of acclamation.
All the players who made it on our list are deserving and have achieved greatness in their respective careers. As the years go by and many greats emerge, lists of this nature will change, but for now, this is what we present to you at SportsBoom.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:01:39.980Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769699422_best-backhands-in-tennis-history-analyzing-the-greatest_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1023,"title":"How Many Grand Slams Has Carlos Alcaraz Won?","slug":"how-many-grand-slams-has-carlos-alcaraz-won-","excerpt":"At just 21 years old, Carlos Alcaraz has already won four Grand Slam titles. The young Spaniard has etched his name into the tennis history books , bu","content_html":"At just 21 years old, Carlos Alcaraz has already won four Grand Slam titles. The young Spaniard has etched his name into the tennis history books, but already being touted as the Spanish Prince of Tennis (following in the footsteps of the great Rafael Nadal) it really is anyone’s guess how far he can go.
To win a Grand Slam is itself an incredible feat, but to do so back-to-back at Wimbledon has been reserved for some special talents in the sport. Carlos has defeated some of tennis’ greatest names, including Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal. He’s even one of a select few to beat Novak twice in major finals!
Carlos Alcaraz has already won four Grand Slams. His French Open win earlier this year saw him become the youngest man to win a Grand Slam on all three surfaces – the hard court, clay court and grass court.
| Grand Slam | Year |
| U.S Open | 2022 |
| Wimbledon | 2023 |
| French Open | 2024 |
| Wimbledon | 2024 |
Alcaraz’s first Grand Slam came in 2022 when he won the US Open over Casper Ruud. Winning in four sets, the then 19 year old Alcaraz became the youngest men’s tennis player to ever reach World No. 1.
A few months later, he won the Wimbledon Championships in London. Defeating Novak Djokovic in an absolute thriller of a fixture, he once again etched his name into history as only the second person after Andy Murray to beat Novak in a Wimbledon final. He would then go on to repeat this incredible feat in 2024.
His last name isn’t actually “Alcaraz”! He was born Carlos Alcaraz Garfia on the 5th of May 2003.
His last name isn’t actually “Alcaraz”! He was born Carlos Alcaraz Garfia on the 5th of May 2003.
His last name isn’t actually “Alcaraz”! He was born Carlos Alcaraz Garfia on the 5th of May 2003.
His last name isn’t actually “Alcaraz”! He was born Carlos Alcaraz Garfia on the 5th of May 2003.
His last name isn’t actually “Alcaraz”! He was born Carlos Alcaraz Garfia on the 5th of May 2003.
Interestingly, Alcaraz has never been a runner up at a Grand Slam event. Every single time he has made the final, he has gone on to win! He does still need to win the Australian Open, it is the last elusive jewel in the Spanish Prince’s growing crown.
Carlos Alcaraz began a tradition of celebrating his Grand Slam wins with tattoos. After winning the 2022 US Open, he had a tattoo done to commemorate the occasion on his left arm. Soon after that, he claimed his maiden French Open win and had a tattoo of the date alongside the Eiffel Tower inked onto his ankle.
The Spanish ace now also boasts the date of his 2023 Wimbledon win and a strawberry on his ankle. His mother has allegedly expressed a concern about this tradition, but in reply, Carlos has committed to just having the dates of each of the four Grand Slams.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:01:30.854Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769690190_how-many-grand-slams-has-carlos-alcaraz-won-_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1022,"title":"Rafael Nadal’s French Open Record: Total Titles Won","slug":"rafael-nadal-s-french-open-record-total-titles-won","excerpt":"There are three certainties in life; death, taxes and Rafa Nadal winning the French Open. The King of Clay made his debut in 2005 and then went on to ","content_html":"There are three certainties in life; death, taxes and Rafa Nadal winning the French Open. The King of Clay made his debut in 2005 and then went on to win a record 14 singles titles at Roland Garros. There is no women, man nor child on the planet who even comes close to this incredible achievement.
Famously, John McEnroe said that one of the most difficult things in world tennis was to beat Nadal in five sets – especially on clay!
There are few athletes in the world who come close to Rafa Nadal’s athleticism, endurance and sharp movement. When you view all of this against the backdrop of a clay court with its slower surface more forgiving match experience, it is no surprise that Nadal was absolutely immense in Paris.
There are very few people who see their sporting achievements translate into eternal honours, much less while they are still playing. Since the European summer of 2021, a ten foot steel sculpture of Rafa has stood at the gates of Roland Garros. It stands amongst the so-called four musketeers of French tennis (Jean Borotra, Jacques Brugnon, Henri Cochet and Rene Lacoste. These are the men who dominated Roland Garros at its inception.
The trophy which awarded to the men’s singles champion at the French Open is called the Coup des Mousquetaires as an ode to the four.
The trophy which awarded to the men’s singles champion at the French Open is called the Coup des Mousquetaires as an ode to the four.
The trophy which awarded to the men’s singles champion at the French Open is called the Coup des Mousquetaires as an ode to the four.
The trophy which awarded to the men’s singles champion at the French Open is called the Coup des Mousquetaires as an ode to the four.
The trophy which awarded to the men’s singles champion at the French Open is called the Coup des Mousquetaires as an ode to the four.
On his first attempt, Nadal lifted the Coup des Mousquetaires in 2005, beating Mariano Puerta in the final. He would go on to set a 31-match unbeaten sequence that suffered a shocking fourth-round defeat to Robin Söderling. It has been touted one of the biggest upsets in tennis history, and rightly so. Nadal lost that match in four sets to the Swede who was eventually beaten in the final by Roger Federer.
Nadal’s next two defeats at the French Open would come at the hands of Novak Djokovic. In 2015, Djokovic got past Nadal in the quarter finals. Nadal was beaten in straight sets by an almost unplayable Djokovic. Although the Serbian giant would ultimately lose the final to a certain Stanislas Wawrinka, his Nadal victory ended another eyewatering run of 39 French Open games unbeaten. It’s a record which, at the time of writing, stands as the tournament record for both men and women in Paris.
Unperturbed, Nadal would once again craft a run of 35 matches unbeaten on the red clay of Roland Garros, dominating between 2016 and 2021. Novak Djokovic was once again the man to bring it to an end in 2021 at the semi-final stage. The significance of this match was recorded in history as being the first time in history that Nadal would lose a match after winning the opening set.
Three years later Nadal would lose again – for the last time in his illustrious career, to Alexander Zverev in the first round. He met the 4th seeded German early on due to his recovery from injury and as such, entering the tournament unseeded. It was the first time he was without a seeding at a Grand Slam since he arrived on the scene in Australia in 2005.
All in all, Nadal won an astonishing 112 of his 116 matches at the French Open.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:01:22.024Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769681682_rafael-nadal-s-french-open-record-total-titles-won_featured.jpg","image_url":null},{"id":1021,"title":"Djokovic’s Grand Slam Titles: The Complete List","slug":"djokovic-s-grand-slam-titles-the-complete-list","excerpt":"Novak Djokovic has won a total of 24 Grand Slam titles in his career. It’s the most of any man – Rafa Nadal comes in second with 22 – and takes him ah","content_html":"Novak Djokovic has won a total of 24 Grand Slam titles in his career. It’s the most of any man – Rafa Nadal comes in second with 22 – and takes him ahead of Serena Williams for the most in the Open era.
Only Margaret Court is on the same level of Novak, albeit that many of her victories came during the so-called amateur era. We’ll break down all 24 titles, the ten at the Australian Open, seven at Wimbledon, four at the us Open and three at Roland Garros. It truly is an amazing career achievement, and it’s not over yet!
Novak Djokovic was ranked as the world number 1 tennis player on the ATP leaderboard for a total of 428 week!
Novak Djokovic was ranked as the world number 1 tennis player on the ATP leaderboard for a total of 428 week!
Novak Djokovic was ranked as the world number 1 tennis player on the ATP leaderboard for a total of 428 week!
Novak Djokovic was ranked as the world number 1 tennis player on the ATP leaderboard for a total of 428 week!
Novak Djokovic was ranked as the world number 1 tennis player on the ATP leaderboard for a total of 428 week!
| Grand Slam | Opponent |
| Australian Open (2008) | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga |
| Australian Open (2011) | Andy Murray |
| Wimbledon (2011) | Rafa Nadal Interestingly, Novak became the first player other than Roger Federer to beat Nadal in a Grand Slam final and became the new World Number 1. |
| US Open (2011) | Rafa Nadal |
| Australian Open (2012) | Rafa Nadal Novak managed to defeat Nadal in 5 hours and 53 minutes. Famously, both players sat down during the trophy ceremony. |
| Australian Open (2013) | Andy Murray Novak became the first man to win three consecutive Australian Open Titles! |
| Wimbledon (2014) | Roger Federer |
| Australian Open (2015) | Andy Murray |
| Wimbledon (2015) | Roger Federer |
| US Open (2015) | Roger Federer Novak Djokovic had to save 19/23 break points to survive this onslaught! |
| Australian Open (2016) | Andy Murray |
| French Open (2016) | Andy Murray Novak became the first player since Rod Laver to win four consecutive Grand Slams. |
| Wimbledon (2018) | Kevin Anderson |
| US Open (2018) | Juan Martin Del Potro Novak was known to idolise Pete Sampras. This win drew him level with the great Pistol Pete at 14 Grand Slam titles. |
| Australian Open (2019) | Rafa Nadal |
| Wimbledon (2019) | Roger Federer Novak saved two championship points against Federer in this match! This was also the first Wimbledon final to be decided by a fifth set tiebreaker. |
| Australian Open (2020) | Dominic Thiem |
| Australian Open (2021) | Daniil Medvedev |
| French Open (2021) | Stefanos Tsitsipas Djokovic became the first man in history to defeat Nadal twice at Roland Garros. He progressed into the final and turned around a two set deficit to claim the title! |
| Wimbledon (2021) | Matteo Berrettini Reinforcing his name in history, Djokovic drew level with Federer and Nadal (with this win) on 20 titles. |
| Wimbledon (2022) | Nick Kyrgios |
| Australian Open (2023) | Stefanos Tsitsipas Who could forget his deportation due to the COVID-19 vaccine issue! Novak Djokovic returned in absolute style though. |
| French Open (2023) | Casper Ruud |
| US Open (2023) | Daniil Medvedev Novak would become the oldest man to win the US open at the ripe old age of 36. |
Novak Djokovic’s name is synonymous with Grand Slam and success within the world of tennis. He’s got the record for the most number of Grand Slam titles as well as the bragging rights of winning a Golden Slam – adding a Gold Olympic Medal to his cabinet.
| Grand Slam | Opponent |
| Australian Open (2008) | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga |
| Australian Open (2011) | Andy Murray |
| Wimbledon (2011) | Rafa Nadal Interestingly, Novak became the first player other than Roger Federer to beat Nadal in a Grand Slam final and became the new World Number 1. |
| US Open (2011) | Rafa Nadal |
| Australian Open (2012) | Rafa Nadal Novak managed to defeat Nadal in 5 hours and 53 minutes. Famously, both players sat down during the trophy ceremony. |
| Australian Open (2013) | Andy Murray Novak became the first man to win three consecutive Australian Open Titles! |
| Wimbledon (2014) | Roger Federer |
| Australian Open (2015) | Andy Murray |
| Wimbledon (2015) | Roger Federer |
| US Open (2015) | Roger Federer Novak Djokovic had to save 19/23 break points to survive this onslaught! |
| Australian Open (2016) | Andy Murray |
| French Open (2016) | Andy Murray Novak became the first player since Rod Laver to win four consecutive Grand Slams. |
| Wimbledon (2018) | Kevin Anderson |
| US Open (2018) | Juan Martin Del Potro Novak was known to idolise Pete Sampras. This win drew him level with the great Pistol Pete at 14 Grand Slam titles. |
| Australian Open (2019) | Rafa Nadal |
| Wimbledon (2019) | Roger Federer Novak saved two championship points against Federer in this match! This was also the first Wimbledon final to be decided by a fifth set tiebreaker. |
| Australian Open (2020) | Dominic Thiem |
| Australian Open (2021) | Daniil Medvedev |
| French Open (2021) | Stefanos Tsitsipas Djokovic became the first man in history to defeat Nadal twice at Roland Garros. He progressed into the final and turned around a two set deficit to claim the title! |
| Wimbledon (2021) | Matteo Berrettini Reinforcing his name in history, Djokovic drew level with Federer and Nadal (with this win) on 20 titles. |
| Wimbledon (2022) | Nick Kyrgios |
| Australian Open (2023) | Stefanos Tsitsipas Who could forget his deportation due to the COVID-19 vaccine issue! Novak Djokovic returned in absolute style though. |
| French Open (2023) | Casper Ruud |
| US Open (2023) | Daniil Medvedev Novak would become the oldest man to win the US open at the ripe old age of 36. |
Novak Djokovic’s name is synonymous with Grand Slam and success within the world of tennis. He’s got the record for the most number of Grand Slam titles as well as the bragging rights of winning a Golden Slam – adding a Gold Olympic Medal to his cabinet.
| Grand Slam | Opponent |
| Australian Open (2008) | Jo-Wilfried Tsonga |
| Australian Open (2011) | Andy Murray |
| Wimbledon (2011) | Rafa Nadal Interestingly, Novak became the first player other than Roger Federer to beat Nadal in a Grand Slam final and became the new World Number 1. |
| US Open (2011) | Rafa Nadal |
| Australian Open (2012) | Rafa Nadal Novak managed to defeat Nadal in 5 hours and 53 minutes. Famously, both players sat down during the trophy ceremony. |
| Australian Open (2013) | Andy Murray Novak became the first man to win three consecutive Australian Open Titles! |
| Wimbledon (2014) | Roger Federer |
| Australian Open (2015) | Andy Murray |
| Wimbledon (2015) | Roger Federer |
| US Open (2015) | Roger Federer Novak Djokovic had to save 19/23 break points to survive this onslaught! |
| Australian Open (2016) | Andy Murray |
| French Open (2016) | Andy Murray Novak became the first player since Rod Laver to win four consecutive Grand Slams. |
| Wimbledon (2018) | Kevin Anderson |
| US Open (2018) | Juan Martin Del Potro Novak was known to idolise Pete Sampras. This win drew him level with the great Pistol Pete at 14 Grand Slam titles. |
| Australian Open (2019) | Rafa Nadal |
| Wimbledon (2019) | Roger Federer Novak saved two championship points against Federer in this match! This was also the first Wimbledon final to be decided by a fifth set tiebreaker. |
| Australian Open (2020) | Dominic Thiem |
| Australian Open (2021) | Daniil Medvedev |
| French Open (2021) | Stefanos Tsitsipas Djokovic became the first man in history to defeat Nadal twice at Roland Garros. He progressed into the final and turned around a two set deficit to claim the title! |
| Wimbledon (2021) | Matteo Berrettini Reinforcing his name in history, Djokovic drew level with Federer and Nadal (with this win) on 20 titles. |
| Wimbledon (2022) | Nick Kyrgios |
| Australian Open (2023) | Stefanos Tsitsipas Who could forget his deportation due to the COVID-19 vaccine issue! Novak Djokovic returned in absolute style though. |
| French Open (2023) | Casper Ruud |
| US Open (2023) | Daniil Medvedev Novak would become the oldest man to win the US open at the ripe old age of 36. |
Novak Djokovic’s name is synonymous with Grand Slam and success within the world of tennis. He’s got the record for the most number of Grand Slam titles as well as the bragging rights of winning a Golden Slam – adding a Gold Olympic Medal to his cabinet.
","category_id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","author":null,"published_at":"2026-03-06T04:01:11.295Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06 04:14:15","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null,"featured_image":"https://cms.dubai7.top/d7-cms/domains/122108af-15b5-4f18-8c67-79081852e5b3/articles/1772769670877_djokovic-s-grand-slam-titles-the-complete-list_featured.jpg","image_url":null}],"pagination":{"page":1,"limit":30,"total":796,"totalPages":27},"links":{"self":"https://iplbettingg.com/api/v1/articles","documentation":"https://iplbettingg.com/developers/","openapi":"https://iplbettingg.com/openapi.json"},"categories":[{"id":"b4b0706c-41fe-4ab6-a5aa-52edf09bed6a","name":"Betting","slug":"betting"},{"id":"84ec0ace-e0e0-4e90-b4c7-acd15ce66414","name":"Boxing","slug":"boxing"},{"id":"d15ddf48-3ab7-43cd-b178-544c315c3bfa","name":"Cricket","slug":"cricket"},{"id":"558293e3-c94a-4af2-81cb-d5f2a8fff056","name":"Darts","slug":"darts"},{"id":"bc3e8b62-1a42-4beb-8cf0-005b2ddf2a29","name":"Football","slug":"football"},{"id":"a9af7fa9-c892-4291-a8e9-eb5e35e2fbe3","name":"Golf","slug":"golf"},{"id":"998cda64-f58c-427d-b75b-f113dd45e5d2","name":"Interviews","slug":"interviews"},{"id":"50a24d3a-ff91-44c6-8b5d-dbd943d2d1d9","name":"MMA","slug":"mma"},{"id":"010758dc-05fb-4945-a0f1-7925e9487f61","name":"Tennis","slug":"tennis"}]}